tick tock
There are ways to contest voting irregularities, which have so far proven to be nothing but hubris, that don't endanger our democracy.
tick tock
not worried at all anytime soon. as i said, the house would never go along with what Gaetz is suggesting, so its moot for now.
This was done by Democrats also in the past, and outside of delaying the inevitable (and pandering to the crowd), there's no tooth in it.
Obviously, it won't stop Chuck Callest from feeding the gullible with BREAKING fodder.
end game swiftly approaching
"What is now sort of evolving into a bit of a standard," Fauci said, is that "if you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more ... the chances of it being replication-confident are minuscule."
It's even more disturbing how idiots like Karrin and Qhris are so quick to cheerlead for fascist behavior when they claim to love America just because their fascist of choice is in charge
Gore conceded to Bush on Dec. 13, 2000.
Nevertheless, Democracy persisted
Muh fascism!
You support it, you own it.
Lol too drunk to realize what's plainly in front of him. do you ever have any points to make or are throwaway lines that dont actually dispute anything or add anything to the conversation your go to?
Completely normal behavior. Pardon your kids for crimes not yet known.
They're not contesting voting irregularities, they're proclaiming them without any evidence.
That's because there was an actual legitimate recount being performed. As sometimes happens. If you can't see the difference between that and this, you're a ing moron.
exactly...literally every "irregularity" is made up bull or has been explained/debunked. we have all these claims or fraud and irregularities but why can none of the rubes on this forum answer why Trump's lawyers won't allege fraud in court, under oath? it's all bull , and it's so incredibly obvious to anyone who isn't a for brains mouthbreathing idiot
Barr good now.
Still the worst AG ever.
Covid ifr .01
gore didnt make baseless assertion of widespread fraud and didnt try to invalidate millions of votes to overturn the election. he wanted a statewide hand-recount in a single state, florida (where the final certified results ended up showing a difference of a mere 537 votes out of nearly 6 million cast), something which trump was granted in georgia in 2020, for instance (with a difference of over 12k votes). when the supreme court ordered that he couldnt have one, bush's lead became fixed, and gore conceded
were members of congress threatening to invalidate the electoral college and simply choosing to not accept them?
Literally no one saying that, derp.
they know they are completely different situations that arent even remotely similar. they are literally just parroting what they hear on OANN, Newsmax, or Chuck Callest tweets now
interestingly enough if you really want to go back to Bush v Gore, it was the Florida house of representatives that actually voted to appoint its electors for Bush... though that controversial call was rendered moot because it came on the same day SCOTUS stopped the recount and gore conceded
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)