Reply With Quote
Let that sink in. Every time you come here it's for me.
I used to converse with you until you turned into a ing moron.Every single one of your posts now revolve around DMC
Let that sink in. Every time you come here it's for me.
Let that sink in. Every time you come here it's for me.
In the political forum.
That’s it and that’s all.
You haven't seen the political forum in years. You only see me
In the political forum.
That’s it and that’s all.
actually, you don't know what anyone else is doing. but you act like it.You haven't seen the political forum in years. You only see me
DMC has thrown in the towel. He's a straight troll. Does nothing but deflect and deride.
Pure resentment and grudge posting, nary any direct address to the topic. All personal bs.
'Absolute liars': Mike Flynn's brother implicated in Army coverup of Jan. 6 failures in scathing memo
A former National Guard official
Col. Earl Matthews, ... ripped the Defense Department's inspector general for what he calls an erroneous report that protects a top Army official who delayed sending the National Guard to the U.S. Capitol
“Every leader in the D.C. Guard wanted to respond and knew they could respond to the riot at the seat of government,”
"[Instead, D.C. guard officials sat] stunned watching in the Armory" as Trump supporters stormed the Capitol.
provided detailed recollections of the response to the riot byGen. Charles Flynn, who served as deputy chief of staff for operations on Jan. 6, and
Lt. Gen. Walter Piatt, the director of Army staff -- who he called
“absolute and unmitigated liars” for their own accounts of that day in congressional testimony.
claims the Pentagon inspector general issued a report last month that was “replete with factual inaccuracies,” and
he said the Army was trying to rewrite history with a do ent that's “worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist.”
publicly called for the inspector general to retract the Jan. 6 report, which he described as "inaccurate" and "sloppy work."
some of our Army leaders have failed us and they did so on January 6th. Then they lied about it and tried to cover it up.
They tried to smear a good man and to erase history.”
https://www.rawstory.com/charles-flynn-jan-6
Complicit in the coup attempt, then complicit in the coverup
You fellows taught us that tact, Winester.
You can dish it.
You cannot take it.
Perfect description of Th'Pusher and his DMC obsession.
But then nö öne ever really gave a aböut your öpinion, sö there's that. Öne day yöu may have a thöught that dösn't invölve me. It dösn't seem likely based ön yöur histöry here.
Called you out for avoiding the topic of the OP.Then the turd twins (Blake has been replaced tbh) come along to report on my goings on, as instructed by me.
It's almost as if you think what happened was ok, and not a problem.
It is looking more and more like a straight up coup attempt.
Look at all the forum rats following the pied piper as I lead them out of of city.Again the hypocrisy unseen and unaware of ... its amazing.Every single one of your posts now revolve around DMC
DMC wants to be the only pied Piper and actually encourages defending a bunch of stupid ass cucks.
Good luck old man.
"Whaaaaa... they are attackiing me, help meh guys!"
- "Go down there and peacefully protest."
- President Trump
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine...ection/620843/“The thing that got our attention first was the age,” Pape said. He had been studying violent political extremists in the United States, Europe, and the Middle East for decades. Consistently, around the world, they tended to be in their 20s and early 30s. Among the January 6 insurgents, the median age was 41.8. That was wildly atypical.
Then there were economic anomalies. Over the previous decade, one in four violent extremists arrested by the FBI had been unemployed. But only 7 percent of the January 6 insurgents were jobless, and more than half of the group had a white-collar job or owned their own business. There were doctors, architects, a Google field-operations specialist, the CEO of a marketing firm, a State Department official. “The last time America saw middle-class whites involved in violence was the expansion of the second KKK in the 1920s,” Pape told me.
Yet these insurgents were not, by and large, affiliated with known extremist groups. Several dozen did have connections with the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, or the Three Percenters militia, but a larger number—six out of every seven who were charged with crimes—had no ties like that at all.
Kathleen Belew, a University of Chicago historian and co-editor of A Field Guide to White Supremacy, says it is no surprise that extremist groups were in the minority. “January 6 wasn’t designed as a mass-casualty attack, but rather as a recruitment action” aimed at mobilizing the general population, she told me. “For radicalized Trump supporters … I think it was a protest event that became something bigger.”
Pape’s team mapped the insurgents by home county and ran statistical analyses looking for patterns that might help explain their behavior. The findings were counterintuitive. Counties won by Trump in the 2020 election were less likely than counties won by Biden to send an insurrectionist to the Capitol. The higher Trump’s share of votes in a county, in fact, the lower the probability that insurgents lived there. Why would that be? Likewise, the more rural the county, the fewer the insurgents. The researchers tried a hypothesis: Insurgents might be more likely to come from counties where white household income was dropping. Not so. Household income made no difference at all.
Only one meaningful correlation emerged. Other things being equal, insurgents were much more likely to come from a county where the white share of the population was in decline. For every one-point drop in a county’s percentage of non-Hispanic whites from 2015 to 2019, the likelihood of an insurgent hailing from that county increased by 25 percent. This was a strong link, and it held up in every state.
Pape drew an analogy to Northern Ireland in the late 1960s, at the dawn of the Troubles. “In 1968, 13 percent of Catholics in Northern Ireland said that the use of force for Irish nationalism was justified,” he said. “The IRA was created shortly thereafter with only a few hundred members.” Decades of bloody violence followed. And 13 percent support was more than enough, in those early years, to sustain it.
Do a histogram of who has posted in this thread. You know what that means, right?
He made you post again, no topical take.
What do you think of the Jan 2nd call to Brad to find more votes, the Eastman memo, and the 11th hour Trump pressure campaign to get Mike Pence to throw out the election results on Jan 6th?
Wrong thread
esn't care ab
damn few topical takes there, mostly content-free jeering
What is your take? was it a coup attempt?
Andy Borowitz
Meadows Decides To Testify After Being Threatened With Sharing Prison Cell With Bannon
- "Go down there and peacefully protest."
What is your take? was it a coup attempt?
- President Trump
why would a 38 page Power Point presentation be necessary the day of a cons utional session of Congress to certify Electoral College results?
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-10-2021 at 03:17 AM.
Your "Ah ha" moment isn't ever com8ng bro... Unlike your faux W's just take the L already you conspiracy nut. Rachel Maddow has more credibility than you tbh.why would a 38 page Power Point presentation be necessary the day of a pro-forma session of Congress to certify Electoral College results?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
