Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 43
  1. #1
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    Good job niglets

    Calling it now.


  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,422
    Patriot Act 2.0, no thanks

  3. #3
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739

  4. #4
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,422
    Criminal code already works fine, no need to ins utionalize a special track for terrorists/political extremists.

  5. #5
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    This is the 2019 draft. Keep in mind 1/6/2021 wilm probably make the final draft more psychotic

    Sect 2332j.

    Acts of terrorism occurring in the territorial jurisdiction of the United States
    (a)

    Prohibited acts
    (1)

    Offenses

    Whoever, in a cir stance described in subsection (b), and with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping—
    (A)

    knowingly kills, kidnaps, maims, commits an assault resulting in serious bodily injury, or assaults with a dangerous weapon any person within the United States; or
    (B)

    creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury to any other person by knowingly destroying or damaging any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property within the United States or by attempting or conspiring to destroy or damage any structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property within the United States,
    in violation of the laws of any State, or the United States, shall be punished under section 2332b(c).
    (2)

    Treatment of threats, attempts and conspiracies

    Whoever threatens to commit an offense under paragraph (1), or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be punished under section 2332b(c).
    (b)

    Jurisdictional bases
    (1)

    Cir stances

    The cir stances referred to in subsection (a) are—
    (A)

    the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce is used in furtherance of the offense;
    (B)

    the offense obstructs, delays, or affects interstate or foreign commerce, or would have so obstructed, delayed, or affected interstate or foreign commerce if the offense had been consummated;
    (C)

    the offense occurs during the course of, or as a result of, the travel of the defendant or the victim—
    (i)

    across a State line or national border; or
    (ii)

    using a facility of interstate or foreign commerce;
    (D)

    the victim, or intended victim, is the United States Government, a member of the uniformed services, or any official, officer, employee, or agent of the legislative, executive, or judicial branches, or of any department or agency, of the United States;
    (E)

    the structure, conveyance, or other real or personal property is, in whole or in part, owned, possessed, or leased to the United States, or any department or agency of the United States;
    (F)

    in connection with the conduct described in subsection (a), the defendant employs a firearm, dangerous weapon, weapon of mass destruction, or other weapon that has traveled in interstate or foreign commerce;
    (G)

    the offense is committed in the territorial sea (including the airspace above and the seabed and subsoil below, and artificial islands and fixed structures erected thereon) of the United States; or
    (H)

    the offense is committed within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States.
    (2)

    Co-conspirators and accessories after the fact

    Jurisdiction shall exist over all principals and co-conspirators of an offense under this section, and accessories after the fact to any offense under this section, if at least one of the cir stances described in subparagraphs (A) through (H) of paragraph (1) is applicable to at least one offender.
    (c)

    Proof requirements

    The following shall apply to prosecutions under this section:
    (1)

    Knowledge

    The prosecution is not required to prove knowledge by any defendant of a jurisdictional base alleged in the indictment.
    (2)

    State law

    In a prosecution under this section that is based upon the adoption of State law, only the elements of the offense under State law, and not any provisions pertaining to criminal procedure or evidence, are adopted.
    (d)

    Definitions

    As used in this section—
    (1)

    the term facility of interstate or foreign commerce has the meaning given that term in section 1958(b)(2);
    (2)

    the term serious bodily injury has the meaning given that term in section 1365(h)(3);
    (3)

    the term firearm has the meaning given that term in section 921(a)(3);
    (4)

    the term weapon of mass destruction has the meaning given that term in section 2332a(c)(2); and
    (5)

    the term territorial sea of the United States means all waters extending seaward to 12 nautical miles from the baselines of the United States, determined in accordance with international law.
    (e)

    Limitation on prosecution

    No prosecution for any offense described in this section shall be undertaken by the United States except on written certification of the Attorney General or the highest ranking subordinate of the Attorney General with responsibility for criminal prosecutions of the offenses in this chapter that, in the judgment of the certifying official, such offense was intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping.

  6. #6
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    90% of the BLM protests last year will be considered domestic terrorism under Patriot Act 2.0

  7. #7
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,422
    90% of the BLM protests last year will be considered domestic terrorism under Patriot Act 2.0
    how so?

  8. #8
    what uganda do about it? Joseph Kony's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Supersonics
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    7,039
    hater slinging at the wall per par.

    you "calling it" just like you called Trump's reelection?

  9. #9
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    Did they confront cops? Yes

    Did they throw projectiles at cops? Yes

    Did they destroy government property? Yes

  10. #10
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,422
    Did they confront cops? Yes

    Did they throw projectiles at cops? Yes

    Did they destroy government property? Yes
    "they"

  11. #11
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    41,654
    90% of the BLM protests last year will be considered domestic terrorism under Patriot Act 2.0
    Yep

    "Whoever, in a cir stance described in subsection (b), and with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion"

  12. #12
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    Yep

    "Whoever, in a cir stance described in subsection (b), and with the intent to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion"
    Thats not the worst imo

    The destruction of property is scary. Even if you move a barrier from point A to B, that could be domestic terrorism.

    Another scary one is the knowing and or planning. If your buddy tells you they are going to a protest, you could be possible complicit.

    Congrats

  13. #13
    VanillaPlayerFan BD24's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    6,605
    Typical Hater overreaction thread. Nothing to see here

  14. #14
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Post Count
    1,676
    Karrin and hater agreeing with each other.

    just like trumpers are want to do, they have no ability to think independently or critically, they’re both ducks who can spell

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    11,973
    What's the proper pronoun in this situation?

  16. #16
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,422
    What's the proper pronoun in this situation?
    not intended as gramatical correction, just pointing out the completely indeterminate number/quality hyped.

  17. #17
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    22,190
    Not every single protest. But I suspect protests of any kind will be more heavily monitored and intricately scrutinized by the government Big Brother.

    And where there is vandalism and violence and especially loss of life, the “protestors” or anti-protestors that cause damage and violence should all be arrested and punished, Trumpers, BLMers, Q s, antifa, and any other group alike.

    Like it or not, it’s a direct result from the asshats at the capitol attack.

  18. #18
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,144
    And where there is vandalism and violence and especially loss of life, the “protestors” or anti-protestors that cause damage and violence should all be arrested and punished, Trumpers, BLMers, Q s, antifa, and any other group alike.
    That's the key. As it should be for the Capitol protestors.

  19. #19
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    Not every single protest. But I suspect protests of any kind will be more heavily monitored and intricately scrutinized by the government Big Brother.

    And where there is vandalism and violence and especially loss of life, the “protestors” or anti-protestors that cause damage and violence should all be arrested and punished, Trumpers, BLMers, Q s, antifa, and any other group alike.

    Like it or not, it’s a direct result from the asshats at the capitol attack.
    The Patriot Act 2.0 was drafted in 2019 yet its all the fault of the 1/6/2021 capitol protestors

    Got it

  20. #20
    Dragon style JamStone's Avatar
    My Team
    Detroit Pistons
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    22,190
    The Patriot Act 2.0 was drafted in 2019 yet its all the fault of the 1/6/2021 capitol protestors

    Got it
    That’s cool.

    Didn’t you start this thread to moan about Biden’s comments on how his planned bill would make the capitol attack definable as domestic terrorism? And hence your conclusion that every protest would be considered domestic terrorism?

    His comments on how he would apply Patriot Act 2.0 is what led to that opinion. That’s a direct result of the capitol attack, breh.

  21. #21
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,514
    There are plenty of ing laws, but big lack of enforcement against white people and corrupt cops and military.

    This law will criminalize "right to assemble"

  22. #22
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    That’s cool.

    Didn’t you start this thread to moan about Biden’s comments on how his planned bill would make the capitol attack definable as domestic terrorism? And hence your conclusion that every protest would be considered domestic terrorism?

    His comments on how he would apply Patriot Act 2.0 is what led to that opinion. That’s a direct result of the capitol attack, breh.
    Patriot act 2 was already in the works.

    Just that after Capitol all of congress and new president are all for it hook line and sinker.

    These kinds of laws should be truly debated and contested thats why we have congress. Yet this is pretty much a done deal now given the comments of politicians and mainstream media.

    The Capitol was 90% a security up. I saw it live. I saw bike cops with bike helmets using their bikes to try and prevent tens of thousands of protestors

    Yet nah, forget it lets enact a patriot act 2.0 that will basically make protesting a domestic terrorist act instead

  23. #23
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    89,422

  24. #24
    🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ElNono's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    152,607
    Criminal code already works fine, no need to ins utionalize a special track for terrorists/political extremists.
    this

  25. #25
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    70,739
    "The insurrection isnt over"


    The insurrection will never be over


    Just like the Jihadi threat will never be over.

    Prepare for perpetual war with a domestic boogieman

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •