Play theater.
Judge rejects Parler's attempt to force Amazon to host it
The evidence Parler “has submitted in support of the claim is both dwindlingly slight, and disputed by AWS,” the judge said in a decision denying Parler a preliminary injunction.
Amazon Web Services was within its rights to shut down social media platform Parler, a federal judge ruled Thursday, rejecting a move by the site to force Amazon to reinstate it.
U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein in Seattle denied a request by Parler for a preliminary injunction that sought to require AWS to continue hosting the site. Rothstein said Parler offered little more than conjecture that AWS had conspired with Twitter to harm its business and said the web hosting service “argued convincingly” that it sought to prevent Parler from being used to promote violence.
The evidence Parler “has submitted in support of the claim is both dwindlingly slight, and disputed by AWS,” she said in a decision denying Parler a preliminary injunction.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/0...ut-down-461164
Play theater.
Yeah, just wait until the REAL thing happens in an undetermined fashion at some point in the future!
^The real Eunuch
Yours it tucked up your butt so...
^Gay fantasies
yup. only a matter of time until military tribunals step in to resolve a civil dispute
Will Rump be signaling his minions to storm Amazon HQs?
Nah, Trump is too busy playing golf in Florida. If someone gets the lead on him he's going to organize a riot to stop the steal and rig the golf course in his favor.
Meh, forcing a private company to do business with another private company is communist.
Then again, there's also the element of we shouldn't side with trillionaires over small business, tbh.
Parler ain't small business, it's owned by Rebekah Mercer.
MOAB incoming.
Tick tock.
We will win.
This next court case will win.
The military will support us.
What's a little insurrection between friends, can't we get some unity?
Trillionaires... or violent fascists...
No easy choice there. Both should go way, IMO.
I mean, they need to step in and stop this blatant communism
Parler. No private business should be forced to take on any customer they don't want for any reason.
Amazon AWS only likes social networks/websites that promote iden y politics, isis, and child porn like Twitter does.
It's their right as a capitalist country, and a private business to reserve the right to deny service to anyone. Even if it works against me, I support that right. There are plenty conservative lawyers, if they are doing something illegal, take them to court.
Pretty much. Nothing is stomping them from hosting their own I would imagine. People like to cry about censorship but corporations don't owe them . Too many don't understand the 1st amendment tbh
And if the net was positive they'd do it. But if they said the extra money isn't worth losing their customer base, that's a business call. It's always a business call.
well, we do have protected classes.
Not understanding "should". ^
This family is flat out bizarre.
And very rich.
I think they would eat on stainless steel gurneys disinfected and straight from the hospital.
Cold metal people.
Why don't the Mercers just use their money to host a site? lol
Same thing with movies not coming out that Rs like. Soderbergh shot a movie on an iphone and that District 9 movie was like 12 years ago used all kind of tricks and techniques to make a sci-fi movie for supercheap but they complain day and night that liberal hollywood won't make their movies. Fund your own media and stfu lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)