Reply With QuoteI heard they asked for Parker/Malik and the Spurs didn't respond yet.
Either way, does this mean they have conceded that Kidd is coming to SA?
Didn't hear it myself, but someone else in Cali did:
link to audio
Nets asked for Parker/Bowen.
Spurs refused.
Counteroffered Parker/Rose.
Enjoy.
I heard they asked for Parker/Malik and the Spurs didn't respond yet.
Either way, does this mean they have conceded that Kidd is coming to SA?
We can only speculate.
Do I win the pool?
Parker and Rose for Jason Kidd???
hmmmm
who will replace Rose? Kevin Willis??? hmmmmm
dangit chump, you beat me to it
could dallas get back in the mix?
This trade could "net" us almost $9 million in cap space to sign other players.
it seems like kidd is in the air... meaning that if these rumors are true, he's not going to be a net much longer.
i say the spurs don't part with parker... more like speedy and malik. pj brown will take up 30 mins plus... and they can save themselves about 4 million in capspace by going in this direction... so they can maybe pickup another decent big guy to fill in the holes?
That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard. If the Spurs do that, they are the dumbest m-fers on the planet. They can get Kidd for zilch. If it doesn't work, then trade Parker next year.
This has got to be total horsesheet!
I personally think this is a dumb move by NJ, unless they want to go back into development mode. Parker is great, but he's not "the man" on a team yet...that was Duncan's job. He would have to go and be THE player on the team in New Jersey...he's only 21, and right now he's not quite to that level (he will be some day though, and will pass Kidd in talent). If NJ wants a s&t, they should try to get Nash off Dallas instead...he's older, more experienced...if they want parker, go after him later.
if any of these rumors are true, the spurs get kidd, maybe keep parker and save themselves a little extra cap room to go after pj brown (who would take up more mins than robinson did last year - meaning malik would get less anyway) and another big on top of that. thats not a bad trade.
maybe they'll counter with speedy? (maybe they're asking his agent right now) maybe these are just bull rumors though... maybe kidd will stay in jersey.
About 9 mil left.
Pj and Alonzo split that?
Bring back Kerr and Willis?
Kidd
Manu
SJax
Bowen
Kerr
Duncan
PJ
Zo
Willis
I could hang with that.
If true, NJ is scurred.
Great question Kori. If they are asking for a sign and trade, then Kidd must want to come to SA. If that's the case, why in the would we give up Parker when we don't have to? Parker is much more valuable in scenarios that you laid out the other night in chat. The Spurs need to parlay Parker into a good big man in some way.I heard they asked for Parker/Malik and the Spurs didn't respond yet.
Either way, does this mean they have conceded that Kidd is coming to SA?
Now if it were Kenyon and Kidd for Parker and Rose, then we'd be in business.
The Spurs would be trying to grant Parker's wish and clear more cap room at the same time.
You guys can't think of anything to do with Duncan, Kidd and $9 million?
Don't make me go Archie on you.
And when Malik leaves in the S&T what do you think Duncan's reaction will be?
Do we really want to piss off our superstar? I realize Rose takes up a lot of cap but keeping TD happy is the most important factor imho. Otherwise I think it would be an extremely wise move, possibly opening space for a true 5 man or PJ to come in.
-G
THE ONLY REASON THE SPURS AND NETS WOULD BE TALKING TRADE IS SO JASON KIDD COULD GET A 7TH YEAR ON HIS CONTRACT....OR SO THE SPURS COULD SIGN SOME OTHER FREE AGENTS.
Maybe Thorn just realized that wishing and hoping and praying isn't what he had to do to keep Kidd, and is trying to convince Kidd not to walk so at least he can get something in return (now that he realized he might actually leave)
Thorn will get a coke and a smile if Kidd really wants to come to SA.
You guys can't think of anything to do with Duncan, Kidd and $9 million?
Don't make me go Archie on you.
One Archie is enough, don't you think?
If this scenario goes through, then i'm gonna be truly pissed off.
I think TD is one heck of an egoistic person !
Where's the promise that TP would be in agreement playing alongside Kidd ?
These whole things are CRAPS since the beginning !
If we trade parker and Malik
Parker is worth more to us than just PJ or Zo. I wouldn't trade Parker unless we can land a top notch big (ie. Brand). We shouldn't need to trade Parker for Kidd.
If we trade parker and Malik we could go out and sign PJ Brown
and a Tyrone Hill and a couple vets like Leonard and Boykins.
This doesnt sound too bad.......
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions