wtf
yeah, the thread is about the future.
Why don't you act like you actually told me this;
And STFU for a hot second... Let it die.
wtf
yeah, the thread is about the future.
Wait so you bump the thread to say "i was wrong when i started the thread, but i might be right, and will 100% be right in the future"æ
Bravest thread in all spurstalk history. By all accounts the goal of the team is to sell tickets not make gambit horny with joy.
More than likely the spurs won't win a championship in any of our lifetimes. The odds are stacked against it, and the trends of spos is to put more power in mega teams at the expense of small teams.
If the spurs actually won the lottery and got a high pick there's At least a 50% chance their agent and sponsor will get them out asap. The alternative is they get the supermax and the team loses depth leading to a failed team. The team dodged a bullet in not signing kawhi. He's not the right fit to lead a small team to greatness.
So, it's weird for gambit to keep bumping the thread saying "let's break all these pots and see if there is treasure inside" nope no treasure. A treadmill team is ALL this team will ever be
^^ wtf
i never said i was wrong. read every post i made in this thread. none are wrong and none even conflict with each other
people made fun of the thread after spurs won a couple games... and i doubled down.
it’s just crazy how many times i have to repeat and explains things. my posts are short and concise too. i’m not here throwing paragraphs around.
sugus acting like this season isn't indicative of what's to come.
everyone here should have a problem with the FO moves / how the roster is assembled... guess what: lebron james, kawhi leonard, kevin durant ain't walking thru the door next season to save this team.
as simple as i can put it, again: the spurs are bad now despite trying to be good. they aren't going to somehow all of sudden improve dramatically by next season.
totally blowing off the very next sentence in the post that explains why i bump this thread
the two sentences in that post don't even contradict each other
Spurs are above 500 "THY'RE DOOOOMED"
Spurs below 500 "They're dooooooomed!"
exactly. that's why the thread is tītled what it's tītled.
This is only viewed as controversial because the apologists can't handle the truth . . .
Mavericks: Best young player in the league, second young player better than any Spurs youth, deep pocketed and willing to use it owner.
Pelicans: Second best young player in the league, second young player better than any Spurs youth, depth of picks.
Grizzlies: Elite young player, second young player better than any Spurs youth, depth of youth.
Rockets: Arguable, but by committing to an actual re-build and not hamstringing themselves by refusing to utilize various avenues to improve long term, they at least have a blank canvas with which to work.
the future is bleak.
hopefully derrick white doesn't breakdown next season...
and dear god if they bring demar back
Outside of Houston, the thread rings true. Dallas, NO, and Mem have the building blocks for a future. Spurs have treadmill talent.
No longer arguable. The Rockets (big surprise that another team that recently lost their superstar was instantly rewarded with another foundational piece, like virtually everyone outside of this dumb organization, that continues to try to lessen the odds of it) just landed a projected foundational piece.
Who are these second young players you speak of?
This division is going to be the NFC Least pretty soon. Each team either has an incompetent front office, wrong coach, or lack of talent. Nobody is winning a chip on this division any time soon. Dallas has the best shot out of all of us due to Luka but Cuban will ruin it.
But as far as future goes, we are tied in last place in foundational pieces and potentially the Rockets get theirs in this years draft. So that causes a lot of frustration
Porzingis, Ingram, Jackson Jr.
Porzingis could be arguable, but the other two are no brainers
Lol.....you guys. The spurs will be fine.
of course they will.why wouldnt they?
China Doll, Twiggy No D and equal to DJ.
You need to factor in DJ has been playing with the short bus coach and lineups his entire career. You try playing next to Bryn Forms and Wombat.
If he flops next year, fine. Bookmark this page. His incremental growth is good.
Jackson
Points 14.4
REB 5.6
AST 1.1
PER 18.10
DJ
Points 15.7
REB 7.1
AST 5.4
PER 16.52
If you're saying Jacksons D is better then DJ's, noo.
to be fair jj only played in 11 games this season
True, and DJ came back after injuries too. But the claim was:
Making a determination based on counting stats without context.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)