Incredible how agreeable this sounds when it's not branded "DEFUND THE POLICE."
Basically, daring Greg Abbott to be a about it.
Incredible how agreeable this sounds when it's not branded "DEFUND THE POLICE."
Branding counts for sure
Although I thought wraparound was reach-around at first ...
I actually don't think the "branding" is going to work. MAYBE Abbott lets it go. But acting like the resistance to defunding the police is mostly about the name is missing the point to such an extent that it feels like a purposeful effort to misinform.
That police get too much money in big cities is a large part of the problem, not just that too little money is being spent elsewhere.
... and 2 years too little training
Well nobody ever accused Greg Abbott of supporting agreeable policies. He's still going to call it defunding the police because it's politically advantageous for him to do so, and liberals have given him that opportunity.
There's no way Abbott lets it go, he has been spoiling for the showdown against satanic police defunders, especially the ones from Austin, TX.
Abbott has also been making noises about reinstating a camping ban statewide, having a homeless hotel would at least mitigate the impact of a new ban. I don't know where people think people with no fixed abode are supposed to go, are they supposed to disappear from public view?
There’s always money to build more private prisons tbh
Nope.
The only way he gets re-elected to anything in Texas:
1) on Austin every chance possible.
2) Kill as many people as possible with COVID for Balous Miller.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)