Close call for me... The fastest way to guaranteeing trouble is signing a non-max player to a max, & I don't know if Collins is a max player, but one advantage he has is he's only been in the league a few years, so his max isn't nearly as high as that of guys like Westbrook or Wall. That's a plus. And I think he'd be easily tradable if it turns out to be a bad fit. But that being said, he's not my favorite target to use the patiently ac ulated cap space on. While putting him between Poeltl & KJ seems somewhat ideal, I also would prefer someone whose defense doesn't need the consideration of hiding-- one reason I was so high on Jonathan Isaac before he got hurt & re-signed. Last year, when Collins was a higher usage rate guy, he was a 20/10 player and his team was pretty bad. This year, he's a lower usage rate player, about 17/8, and his team is at .500... so Collins playing fewer minutes and taking fewer shots has actually been good news for the Hawks, giving a bigger role to two way player De'Andre Hunter. That's a bit of a red flag for me, though I can also see the argument that the Hawks are simply getting better because all of their many young players-- & this includes Collins-- are improving and jelling. Luka and Walker are both really young, having each just turned 21 & 22, and will cost less in the next three years combined than Collins on his own, leaving the Spurs room for another signing... man, it's a really close call, but I think I have to vote no on this and hope the Spurs can find a different route. But that being said, I wouldn't fault them for doing it. I wouldn't label it a bad move by any means, but just not the optimal move in my opinion.