Reply With Quote
(Not interested, but compulsively replies.)
Not interested in you. I just like ing with you and watching you spin out of control
(Not interested, but compulsively replies.)
so you lied about your work.You don't know what I do for work. That's evidence enough that i don't talk about it. Never claimed to be a headhunter, that's your narrative. I wasn't lying about Time Magazine or Popular Science.
No, you aren't correct. Keep whiffing though.
And your lying cause me to whiff.
K
that’s how old man get his jollies.
You would do much better on here with your Ws if you could actually tell the truth. You have a lot of professions to keep track of so it must be difficult.
Can't help himself under cover of anonymity, when deflection and distortion don't work, he lies and cheats.
But you don’t talk about your work.
You publish articles in Time magazine and now Popular Science (yeah, it’s a wonder you got edited), you are an EXPERT in Vac s, you at least ferry PHD students around and they don’t know compared to you.
Keep going.
And I am happy to hear that you don’t care enough about me to try and look me up on Facebook or check the sites emails like you have done with others.
and then you make fun of the wild cobra... yet you triangulate for posters background on this site.
Hypocrisy and lies.
He asks about my work, I give a cursory explanation, and then it’s a “aha I got you by lying about what I do”
And then, “I don’t care about what you do and you don’t know what I do”
Except he is
1 an expert in vacuums (Hoover models?)
2 Writer for popular science and time magazine
3 assesses PhD students in science for their competence
and there is lots more. he is a renaissance man.
Moar narrative. It's fun watching you run around with your hair on fire.
Now you've reduced "headhunter" to "ferrying". Who's lying again?
It's obvious you're rattled. You should take a break and post another novel.
^^^ does not care about pgardn
Abbott to overcharged Texans: eat
Testimony on Thursday in the House and Senate revealed the price of potential “overcharges” was nowhere near the $16 billion figure that Patrick used to rally most of the Senate against the PUC earlier in the week. Notably absent from the list of those senators criticizing the PUC was Business and Commerce Committee Chairman Kelly Han .
Patrick, perhaps unsatisfied with the performance of the senators, took a seat during this week’s hearing of the Senate Jurisprudence Committee and questioned PUC Chairman Arthur D’Andrea at length. During that exchange, Patrick asked D’Andrea whether he trusted the legal opinion of an economist, spoke in threatening tones about whether the governor’s appointee could be trusted, and asked the chairman why the commission didn’t just “let the market be the market?”
“The market was killing people. That’s why,” D’Andrea answered. “The market was killing people in their homes.”
Care about? Sure. Interested in? no.
You've nary room to harp on pedantry.
one good turn deserves another
yeah I’m in shambles.
Oh but it’s not ferrying or headhunting but this is what you stated.
Your superiority to PhD students in science. And yes you were questioning them.
You can’t keep up with your own characters.
Do you need to keep a log of what you are and do while addressing different posters so there is some consistency? I would think a published writer for Time and Popular Science would think through their fiction.
Straight from Thread. DMCopyThatPhrase
The plagiarizing master of his craft, whatever craft is convenient at the time.
Show the quote else you're narrating.
Between my legs lays your mother.
Man, that snap's older than Yo grandma’s kick-start vibrator.
It's old for sure but comes naturally
You know what I am talking about.
Otherwise you would say it is complete nonsense.
But you wont, because its not.
Dont play games old man.
Im also not going to fetch an old update you have given the board while traveling and enjoying a drink out by the pool at the hotel.
"But I dont discuss my business"
Bull .
"Im above all this nonsense of discussing my many accomplishments"
fkn hypocrite. You ASK me what I did. And then play it out to be breakthroughs on a technique in the 70s, like it just sits there unchanged into 2020... And Just because you have gotten your ass handed to you multiple times concerning topics that you have ventured into that you just dont know or are completely wrong. And then you have the gall to use me as some sort of expert testimony when arguing with others...
No shame.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
