No. You're free to abandon your 9/11 thread because you're afraid to discuss 9/11.
Your choice.
How many cameras to you say were aimed at that blank wall at the Pentagon in 2001?
Walk away, sperm shielder.
No. You're free to abandon your 9/11 thread because you're afraid to discuss 9/11.
Your choice.
How many cameras to you say were aimed at that blank wall at the Pentagon in 2001?
Nothing's abandoned. You disqualified yourself from serious discussion, sperm shielder.
Stop whining about me and set the record straight on 9/11.
How many cameras to you say were aimed at that blank wall at the Pentagon in 2001?
I have a friend that lives less than half a mile away from the Pentagon. That day, she heard a plane fly very low, very loud, and over her house, which was unusual as planes (commercial or otherwise) did not fly over her house. She went outside when she heard the explosion and saw the big "mushroom" cloud of smoke coming from the Pentagon area.
As she was packing her family in her car, she called numerous people to leave the area as she thought it was a nuclear blast.
It was real.
Make it 46. I'm in.
I will grace you with moving past your sperm shielding effort.
But consider this a grace.
Further sperm shielding may DQ you from consideration.
The FBI responded to a FOIA request stating they had 85 videos for it.
Michael Moore has stated it's well more than a 100.
Another white chumpette honkey appropriating black culture.
let's see your source saying 100 cameras were pointing at that wall.
You got called out on sperm shielding. Come to terms.
Or you sticking to your one camera BS?
I'm calling you out on your BS.
Show me your sources saying 85+ and 100+ cameras were pointing toward the wall that was hit.
I don't care what a sperm shielder calls out. I gave you the numbers and who said them.
You pretend the ing Pentagon has less security cameras than many mobile homes.
You're a ing pathetic sperm shielding piece of .
No. I said plainly that one camera was pointing at that exterior wall in 2001.
Where is your source saying 85+ and 100+ cameras were pointing at that wall in 2001?
If you want to fold at my feet again, just say so.
I'm not squabbling with you on stupid sh**. How many cameras if not one?
that's what I asked you.
It's not stupid -- it's your claim. Well, I agree your claim is stupid .
Show your sources saying 85+ and 100+ cameras were aimed at that wall of the Pentagon.
Or admit you made it up.
Don't cry about me. Man up.
Currently your answer is that the FBI has one video of the attack on the Pentagon.
I only at you at this point.
Not an answer, Wile E. Derptacular. It's like you are afraid of the answer. Let me help you through your fear.the problem with your massive conspiracy theory, is that no one has had a death bed confession to come forward saying their accounts were purposefully faked.
Do you have any such confessions, moron?
Do you have anyone who recanted their account of seeing a plane or had a deathbed confession of this massive conspiracy to create fake acount of a plane hitting the pentagon?
You're still only crying about me.
My answer is that there was one camera pointed at the wall that was hit in 2001.
Your claim is there were over 85 cameras pointed at that wall in 2001.
What is your source?
I don't link chase for sperm shielders. You're the derp saying only one video of the attack is in FBI control.
I'm saying there was only one camera pointing at that wall in 2001.
You said there were 85+ pointing at that wall in 2001.
Where did you get that bull ?
Did you just make it up?
I know you're trying to do semantics on this. How many videos of the attack exist?
Three was one camera pointing at that wall in 2001. The wall was far behind the gate upon which the camera was focused. The frame rate was one per second.
You said there were 85+ pointing at that wall in 2001.
Where did you get that bull ?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)