Reply With Quote
He's a merely because he doesn't believe in your conspiracy theories apparently.
Why would you consider something by a so-called high profile terrorist random? That's stupid on it's face.
He's a merely because he doesn't believe in your conspiracy theories apparently.
If Cosmo is the saddest jackass then what does that say about someone who's dedicating a thread to him? The irony...
You (desperately) wish you could have that kind of effect.
Nah, you were belittling their ability to plan it.
You said you already knew about it. But if it helps he was a graduate Civil Engineer you ing moron.But now that you've alerted me that OBL had a book shelf and a coffee table I may have to give this a serious rethink.
No you thick dip . From the CIA's perspective they cannot be expected to follow every Arab and track every plane. They were random for them.
No. He's a because of the way he behaves. The gets humiliated on every forum but just ignores the whole ing lot and doubles down with complete e. He then s off to another forum and does the same again. He reports it all here - because he is a .
I don't have any conspiracy theories. You seem to be a regulation "thick-as- -conspiracy-theorist". Par for the course.
It says I am dedicating a thread to the saddest jackass on the internet who uses the saddest forum on the internet to record his daily ing e.
Urban Dictionary: spurstalk
mainly because some moderators delete threads started by s as soon as they see them.
get a ing education you ignorant prick,The only way to fight back that I can think of is to
post what I spam on other forums.
They closed them because you are a spamming getting your ignorant arse kicked.Over on Political Forum the moderators would just delete my posts when I started spamming the out of them.
Haha, what the ! You think this stupid forum and your idiotic spam record thread is making the difference?When I started reporting those deletions here, they did it a lot less. It's having a positive effect from my perspective.
Spamming wanker.Look at all of these closed threads.
Truther? Get the out of here. You are a lying sack of who doesn't give a about truth.I was about the only truther posting on those threads.
They aren't shills you insane paranoid prick. They are normal people kicking your ignorant arse.The shills
working that forum were making me look like a total . But I had the at ude I was winning when I am being publicly humiliated.
The moderator closed those threads because I am a spamming
I most certainly was. OBL was under CIA surveilance. He would not be able to coordinate that Herculean effort from a half a world away through carrier pigeon.
The civil engineers have already said the govt. narrative of the steel melting and the towers falling at that speed is BS.
But to circle back, it doesn't help at all. OBL wasn't on the ground. And you don't have to be a civil engineer to say fly plane into building and it fall (if that were a truth).
Do you not understand how deep the CIA's resources are? A top risk will get the attention it deserves.
You should question who the CIA really serves and what their charter is instead of sperm shielding for them.
My guess is you're a Chumpette alt and this is standard for you.
He comes here and respectfully posts his viewpoints. You're the total .
If you can't handle that his viewpoint is different, then don't participate.
Sure you do. You support the US government's 911 conspiracy theory, which has more holes in it than Swiss cheese.
and yet here you are posting on the saddest forum on the internet. what's that say about you?
Wow if only all here could follow this train of thought.
Then it wasn't a ing slightly hyperbolic statement you moron
No, you mean the US security services were majorly competent?OBL was under CIA surveilance.
Get the out of it you bellend. He just needed to activate a few people to get lessons and hijack at the same time. Herculian is the complete bull inside job.He would not be able to coordinate that Herculean effort from a half a world away through carrier pigeon.
Last edited by Fatfreddy88; 03-05-2021 at 10:24 PM.
Say what mother er? The definite article, not "some", not "a few" but THE civil engineers. Wrong arsehole, a few is the correct term. And guess what you dumb , the government never claimed steel melted and the towers didn't topple at freefall. You clueless dip .
So your whole claim that it was too difficult to plan is a load of old bollocks - god you are one dumb .But to circle back, it doesn't help at all. OBL wasn't on the ground. And you don't have to be a civil engineer to say fly plane into building and it fall (if that were a truth).
You watch too much TV you daft er.
Yuck, is that what you conjure up in your head - is that what the SPURT is in your nameYou should question who the CIA really serves and what their charter is instead of sperm shielding for them.. I'm not American, I couldn't give a e about them.
Your guesses are no better than your general verbal diarrhoea.My guess is you're a Chumpette alt and this is standard for you.
Nah, he's a . He acts like a , spams like a , ignores debate like a . Thick .
You are actually his junior clone, thick - so your opinion is a big turd.You're the total .
It's not his viewpoint. He acts like a , spams like a , ignores debate like a .If you can't handle that his viewpoint is different, then don't participate.
No, really I don't.
Why would I care about that?You support the US government's 911 conspiracy theory
If you say so you dumb .which has more holes in it than Swiss cheese.
Yes you lying sack of ?
Nah. It's proof you are a lying sack of .I think this thread this guy started is proof that he's a sophist.
Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)
5. Miscellaneous: ".anyone who sees it will see that he's just a paid sophist."
This is probably the worst one of all. For this enormous diversionary statement, he gets to ignore every single thing written by an expert in almost every aspect of the Apollo Missions. He gets to ignore a concise website detailing debunks for almost all his total crap. He gets to ignore every post made where he always get his ass handed to him. The basis for this is his "credibility test".
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/gene-cernan-jump-proves-they-are-on-the-moon.580330/#post-1072162665This proves you are a lying sack of . The regolith lands at the same time. How can you even still hang around after that you moron?
This video of his is ten years old.
Apollo 17 - analysis of another jump sequence
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSuvW0FRd-U
So what? It looks at the jump in terms of the gravitational speeds - it doesn't even talk about the regolith. I'm fairly sure you cannot possibly have even watched it!
I did, you're a , the regolith lands at the same time. What kind of ing moron claims the dust is bouncing - you bellend.He usually doesn't get that sloppy (click on the top link).
You forget you are dumb enough to link to a forum where it's easy to see that you are a lying sack of .My guess is that it wasn't possible to change the speed on YouTube videos when he made that one and he didn't foresee that it would be possible in the future to expose his sophistry by playing it back at a slower speed (I don't remember if it was possible or not).
You are a and you are a lying sack of .Give us your analysis of this. This is an objectivity test.
Debunking The Apollo Moon Hoax (debunking-a-moron.blogspot.com)
6. Credibility Test:"This calls for a credibility test. XXXXXXX maintains that the Chinese spacewalk was real and not faked in a water tank. Do you agree with him?
This is where the spammer uses one of his pre-determined idiotic conspiracies or erroneous claims as the yardstick for a credibility test. He is the arbitrator of its provenance therefore anyone who disagrees with it can now be referred to as "discredited" and all their rebuttal can be ignored.
You ludicrous human being. Every single thing you do is like a comedy cut and paste flow chart.
Proving you are a lying sack of . So is this arsehole who made the video you are spewing out everywhere.
Claim 1 says all the lunar dust "doesn't go up with him.
Apollo and Sunlight : addendum | PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics
"Number 3: This shows a clear parabolic arc of dust between John Young's boots that is 100% irrefutably rising and falling at the same time as he is. PROVING that he must be on the Moon."
If you can't see this you are either blind or a lying sack of .
Claim 2 says all the volleyball player's does.
Reflector | Page 2 | PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics
"Regarding Volleyball videos - your search capabilities are as inept as your education on practically everything you debate upon :-"
Bottom line both his points make you a lying sack of and none of them have anything to do with the Cernan jump you ing cretin.
But seriously, you are using your y opinion here. It doesn't count you lying sack of . You will do anything to avoid admitting defeat.His attempt at sophistry is too clear to obfuscate.
http://www.politicalforum.com/index....e-moon.580330/
I put the video on at 0.25 speed. It shows a wave of regolith coming down in unison with his jump, the last bit hits the tiniest fraction of a second after the leading edge - his feet are down.Put the video on .25 speed and you can see that what he says is soil landing is really soil bouncing back up after having landed. This was intentional deceit. You can jump up and down and rant all you want. People will believe what they see and won't be moved by your rant.
What kind of sicko are you? You just show 100% proof he must be on the ing moon!
Apollo and Sunlight : addendum | PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics
"Number 4: This is a clear indicator of simultaneous soil dropping at the same speed as the jumper. This is 100% proof he is on the Moon."
Do what you want in this thread, FF. It's your cry thread; feel free to cry all you want. I'm out.
You think your y opinion is worth something? You think you testing me means something you ignorant .
What a lying sack of you are. Bouncing soil? You ing moron.Anyone who sets the speed to .25 and watches the video can see that what Betamax says is soil landing is really soil that has bounced back up after having landed.
I'm a who knows Apollo was real and Betamax makes me cry because I am so ing stupid.
Because you are a . Click here for an example.
Hey Cosmoron - I missed your response to this - you cowardly sack of :
Proving you are a lying sack of . So is this arsehole who made the video you are spewing out everywhere.
Claim 1 says all the lunar dust "doesn't go up with him.
Apollo and Sunlight : addendum | PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics
"Number 3: This shows a clear parabolic arc of dust between John Young's boots that is 100% irrefutably rising and falling at the same time as he is. PROVING that he must be on the Moon."
If you can't see this you are either blind or a lying sack of .
Claim 2 says all the volleyball player's does.
Reflector | Page 2 | PoliticalForum.com - Forum for US and Intl Politics
"Regarding Volleyball videos - your search capabilities are as inept as your education on practically everything you debate upon :-"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
