Reply With Quote
here's a good one team trade
spurs buy out aldridge
thats it
3 team trade that everyone should be good with:
MIA: Lowry & Aldridge
TOR: Dragic, Olynyk, & Lyles (they get a couple Canadians lol)
SAS: Iguodala, Baynes, & Bradley
Baynes would be a great back up center, especially of Poeltl gets into foul trouble. He is struggling this year but it could just be because he doesn’t fit in Toronto.
here's a good one team trade
spurs buy out aldridge
thats it
How about a package of Cedi Osman/Taureen Prince for LMA with draft compensation? Desperate times and I’ve always like Prince.
I’ve been thinking about a possibility of a three team trade that includes Prince coming to the Spurs and sends Drummond to the third team. Possibly NYK
im wondering whats the spurs price for lma... 25 yo player and two firsts? should be sth like this, right?
Definitely.
Had the spurs did what I suggested 3 years ago, we'd be sitting good. I said, trade Leonard AND Aldridge in the summer of 2017(since leonard didn't want to be here), but trade them to a team that had no chance of going to the draft and trade them for a 1st round pick. Then we should have tanked that season. In the 2019 draft, we would have had 3 lottery picks. that's the draft we got keldon and Luka.
I like how you think a team that acquired Kawhi Leonard and LaMarcus Aldridge wouldn't make the playoffs. Real genius here.
had Aldridge or Kawhi been traded to the right teams with no other superstars, they wouldn't have. , Aldridge couldn't even make the playoffs here with Defrozen. wtf lol.
Aldridge literally helped make the playoffs with neither Kawhi nor Demar, and a conference finals with Kawhi sidelined. I know he’s on the way out, but let’s not create revisionist history here.
Good post. It reminds me of when Parker started to decline late in his career, and his long-time haters crawled out of the woodwork and made the asinine argument of "he's not good now, therefore he was never good to begin with". The same thing is happening with Pop now fwiw.
He made it with Derozan during their first year together. Like the other poster who responded to you said lets not have revisionist history here. If you hate him fine but lets not make up lies.
What's the incentive for the Spurs to buy him out?
It opens up a roster spot, and if he accepts a small pay cut in return for the ability to sign with a team of his choosing (and get paid by that new team), it gives the Spurs a bit more breathing room under the tax to bring in a prospect or use some of the MLE on a buyout candidate of their own.
There's no point in keeping a player who clearly doesn't want to be with the team anyway.
A buyout is also for less money, taking us far enough under the tax to sign someone into that spot.
Or a scrub with a broken leg
Or a scrub with a broken leg
Oh wait... no that's not funny .
Or a scrub with a broken leg
Spurs now the team that resorts to faking Workman's Comp and Medicaid fraud
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
