Reply With Quote
The author puts a picture of himself in a sleeveless shirt at the end to confirm credibility.
You obviously don't read scientific journals either - but, hey Nono, I respect your right to do what you want and I sincerely hope it works out for you (and everybody else).
The author puts a picture of himself in a sleeveless shirt at the end to confirm credibility.
Finding any little thing to dismiss stuff that s on your narrative. Par.The author puts a picture of himself in a sleeveless shirt at the end to confirm credibility.
Nothing he says really matters all that much. You didn't read any of it anyway. Par.
David Icke
All he does is try to frighten people.
I agree with you on this one Chump - I don't care for David Icke either - but I liked the Bill Gates poster.
All he does is try to frighten people.
There was an awesome interview by Icke about 15 years ago. I can't find it right now. But he was interviewing a guy about the Denver Airport and it all started out reasonable enough. Just talking about symbolism and all that. Then all of a sudden, the interviewee talked about going down an elevator and seeing lizard people. It was ing great reading.
All he does is try to frighten people.
What do you way Bill Gates wants you to do?
I liked his idea of blocking sunlight. i'd like a cooler spring and fall in Texas.
You got crossed over. Reality.Nothing he says really matters all that much. You didn't read any of it anyway. Par.
You didn't read the article. Reality.
I like this one too
You think Bill Gates is intentionally infecting you?I like this one too
Second Moderna shot Wednesday, derp.
Already had my 2nd shot of Pfizer.
I win
Win what?Already had my 2nd shot of Pfizer.
I win
A 3rd shot within 12 months.
Get your vaccine.
How many thousands died already?
Show his numbers.
Wrong, I do read scientific journals. I quote plenty of them here.
I value my time though, so I'll pass on the garbage.
See? This isn't science, nor a scientific journal.
Wear a mask.
You want some numbers?
#8: UNDER-REPORTING OF ADVERSE REACTIONS AND DEATH
According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) – read page 6 at the link above.
While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this writing VAERS reports over 2,200 deaths from the current covid vaccines, as well as close to 60,000 adverse reactions.“VAERS data released today showed 50,861 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines, including 2,249 deaths and 7,726 serious injuries between Dec. 14, 2020 and March 26, 2021.”And those numbers don’t include (what is currently) 578 cases of Bell’s Palsy.
If those numbers are still only 1% of the total adverse reactions (or .8 to 2% of what this study published recently in the JAMA found), you can do the math, but that equates to somewhere around 110,000 to 220,000 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions.
Bet you didn’t see that on the news.
That death number would currently still be lower than the 424,000 deaths from medical errors that happen every year (which you probably also don’t hear about), but we are not even six months into the rollout of these vaccines yet.
If you want a deeper dive into the problems with the VAERS reporting system, you can check this out, or check this out.
But then there’s my next point, which could be argued makes these covid vaccines seem pointless…
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
