#stillwithinjectinghydroxychloroquinehim
‘It’s going to disappear. One day it’s like a miracle – it will disappear’
Bend over, I'll ing make it disappear.
So people cannot be trusted with the scientific truth, they must be lied to in order to coerce compliance?
When scientific authorities lie to control public response, it underlines just why organizations like the CDC cannot get public funding for gun control research.
So now you acknowledge masks are effective?
Do you still beat your wife?
Sorry. I seem to recall you suggesting the CDC changed their mask guidance not because of efficacy, but as a result of political pressure. Must have been some other ...
DatManCurbstomped
Philo with the way back machine ignoring time stamps for posts, knowing no one will give a enough to actually click on the links.
I've been quite clear since the start that N95 masks that are used by medical professionals, that are fit tested and protect the wearer do prevent the spread. I've been clear also that using like bandanas do not. Airlines agree with me since they won't allow you to board with a bandana as a mask. But keep equivocating the term "mask" to be all masks. I guess you contend I think even SCBA doesn't work so hazmat crews cannot actually enter quarantined areas.
Figures the birds would +1 your feeble attempt.
But back to the facts - Why do some here think it's ok for the CDC and Fauci to lie about scientific fact and use the excuse of "knowing what's best for us" as a cover?
I suggested it as a more plausible scenario, that they started with the more plausible truth and regressed into the more political feel good narrative of masks for everyone. It makes more sense and seems more palatable than thinking that your own science based organization would lie to you for your own good. The common theme is that they started with the misstep because they didn't know it could be spread by asymptomatic people. If you believe that you're a ing idiot.
DMN and UT polls have a shred of cred?
"Abbott is now being favored by 39% of respondents in the state, whereas McConaughey is getting support from 38%, according to a poll from The Dallas Morning News and University of Texas at Tyler. Almost a quarter of Texans said that they would vote for another candidate."
McC still the best bet to remove Scabott?
15 months is a political eternity, I wouldn't set much by any poll this far out. Could help establish Wooderson's cred for fundraising purposes, though.
The Democrat Governor candidate roster is abysmal. It's probably Beto or bust, and he's going to be a nonstarter with the gun cult.
Yes. Being in a statistical dead heat with a sitting GOP governor is all anyone could ask for at this point.
IOW, really good for rookie numbers.
Seriously, out of the entire Texas population are these really our two only choices?
.
Don't forget Allen West.
Andrew White was a decent candidate last time but he got primaried by the latest 15-minutes-of-fame Democrat official.
1. Allen West have a snowballs chance in KKK Repug Texas?
2. Seriously that's it? West and McC the only challenges to Scabbott
Is he running again?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)