Reply With Quote
Moot. Toronto wouldn’t do it.
And yes, I couldn’t sign the paperwork fast enough on this deal.
- Trade DeMar for Pascal Siakam?
- Siakam has the type of contract DeMar would sign and he is a natural 4.
- He is mostly what we want we want Luka to be.
- Pascal is not happy in Toronto and DeMar is loved in there (more than here).
- I would not do this deal. I like DeMar as a player and as a person.
- Pascal could be more impactful than John Collins and Markkanen. He is a good defender and a decent low post scorer.
- Would you do it?
Moot. Toronto wouldn’t do it.
And yes, I couldn’t sign the paperwork fast enough on this deal.
They’re not trading Siakam for Derozan.
Every single GM in the NBA would take Siakam for DeRozan
Not a single GM in the NBA would trade Siakam for DeRozan
I'd do whatever Pop tells me to do
Every poster on this board has a certain style of writing, but you sir, have an interesting one.
no , but would never happen
Just to push the conversation in an interesting direction, would anyone throw in Lonnie to do this deal?
Spurs are the only team in the nba trading for derozan
Straight-up...sure... but Toronto wouldn't do that....if the relationship there has soured to the point that they would move him it would take more than DDR S&T...
everybody with a brain would do it. Which is exactly why Toronto won't
I would trade 2 Demars for 1/3 of a Siakam.
As long as we are living in a fantasy world, I would trade DeRozan for Doncic, or Jokic, or Giannis, or Jesus.
Which third?
A good way to read spurstalk trade ideas is to add "plus two unrestricted first round draft picks". The trades usually make sense with that correction.
I'm sorry, who said pascal was not happy in Toronto?
Why would toronto trade him for a 33 year old Demar?l
Let's play.
Yeah, it still would be a steal of a trade for SanAn - Lonnie, while an intriguing prospect (and I'm higher on him than most posters on this board), remains extremely unproven and a question mark that has the possibility to not even become a consistent starter long-term; DeRozan's flaws speak for themselves. Siakam, on the other hand, while limited in some ways and not someone I'd build a team around, is much more proven, a player capable of being a #2 on a championship team, and a very modern two-way big whose skillset will always be in demand, especially in this modern league. Not to mention he's still relatively young and hasn't visibly reached his ceiling, whilst DeRozan is pretty evidently already at his (or past his, if we're talking athleticism) and hardly getting better, instead worse and older.
I think even DeMar + Lonnie + FRPs still gets a bounce from Toronto, and with good reason. They could turn Siakam into better prospects and/or more picks, especially if they sold him to a desperate team hoping for that final push (for example, Jrue got a damn solid package back from MWK, better than our package would be IMO). Given Toronto's stage of rebuilding, DeRozan is virtually worthless to them in any scenario, whilst Siakam remains their biggest asset should he be shipped off.
I would trade DeRozan for Chris Boucher, Siakam's back up.
I suppose I was curious to see if there were any diehard Lonnie supporters still out there. But yeah, they're not obviously going for that trade. It will be interesting to see if y P forces his way to a coastal team. It would be a sad, fitting denouement to their le team.
This is who we should go after.
Would anybody trade Kawhi for Demar?
bad joke? This was easy pickings.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
