I mean, this is so bad, I don't know where to start...
78% of US debt is public. International debt is a minuscule amount. (~3 trillions?). Plus the debt is denominated in US dollars, so there's no scenario where the US cannot fulfill it's obligations. This very basic concept is largely why the US is in a completely different situation than third-world countries, that must issue debt in other currencies (like US dollars) and it's largely why they need to starve their countries to repay debt.
You can't force US citizens to take jobs they don't want to take. And you will kill industries and increase the trade deficit if you don't produce. This is why the whole immigrant, low-cost labor conversation is much more complicated than sound bites.
How many people need to suffer and/or die in the altar of debt and money? I'm all for increased oversight and crackdown on fraudulent en lement benefits, but that's basically where it ends. Also, social security is a fund that was paid into, technically not an en lement.
Changing Fed rates isn't a magic wand. They're simply one way to control the money supply, and has limited application (see 2008). There isn't one perfect rate, there are different rates for different economic contexts.
And the overarching problem with this analysis is the end goal. Why do we want to be "in the green"? Is there inflationary pressure so big that it's worth all those sacrifices? Is this even viable in a global economy?
Companies will have relatively little problem relocating to avoid the taxes, but the impact on the little guy is much bigger.
Once we're "in the green", what's the benefit? What are we going to spend that surplus money on? Pay down debt?