Reply With Quote
2nd guess, Dale didn't bother with a factual denial, but just called me a hypocrite.
And I always will. Why the old man never dwelled on it semi daily is a mystery to me, though he did lodge it during his 2nd Impeachment Trial to great effect.
No, I'll never let it alone, Winester. It's pure gold and only gets better with time. It is an outrage. That she still is AWOL is the kicker. She'll surface again though, just biding her time spending her millions, aging one day at a time. She ed up and knows it.
2nd guess, Dale didn't bother with a factual denial, but just called me a hypocrite.
That cope
That deflection
It's not about the nail
I notice you didn't deny it either.
You didn't deny being a hypocrite.
How am I a hypocrite?
Because I didn't denounce Madonna four years ago?
Were you rooting for the Jan. 6th rioters, DMC?
Simpatico,perhaps?
#MissingHimHard
Your shtick is pure deflection and straw man, you’ve nary room. Plus, you’re wrong. Your unwillingness to consider other points of view isn’t your adversriy’s weakness, it’s yours.
You're still not denying it.How am I a hypocrite?
Because I didn't denounce Madonna four years ago?
Didn't even know it was happening, don't watch the news. I just got on here and saw it happened and saw a golden opportunity to salt mine a little
I think it's funny how some of you who watch the ing news 24/7 and have a dozen streaming services and talking heads going, along with twitter feeds and - think everyone else must be doing that too. Therefore they must have a really firm opinion of it, and if that opinion doesn't align with what I saw, they aren't with it socially.
It's hilarious actually, people like you and Boutons going all day and night with the twitter feeds and news site article regurgitation like you're lobbying congress and in reality like 2 people maybe will ever read it and they have their minds made up before hand.
You just cannot grasp the concept that not everyone is glued to this like you are, because many see it as just another form of entertainment so they skip it. Funny how you never consider the other option - didn't see it, didn't give a .
Last edited by DMC; 05-30-2021 at 12:20 AM.
You've gone to extreme measures to avoid actually having a point of view. Instead you seem more interested in sashaying around with frilly verbosity and rapid fire posting the thoughts of people who don't and would never post here (twitter feeds).
I am totally willing to offer my opinion and have many times in this thread, you're the one doing backflips avoid giving yours. many direct questions you're still ducking.
If you have a question for me, just ask.
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-30-2021 at 12:31 AM.
if you didn't notice the Jan 6th Capitol riot at the time, what do you think of it now, profe?
Last edited by Winehole23; 05-30-2021 at 12:33 AM.
no need to, it's unrelated to the factual truth or falsity of my takes in this thread.
do you approve of or endorse the Jan 6th putsch, DMC?
I don't believe I'm a hypocrite for ignoring Madonna's ludicrous and completely unserious threat and pointing out DJT's real attempt to derail the certification of the 2020 election by the US Congress, no.
Beforehand, Trump lobbied the VP to set the EC results aside, after his attempts to corrupt state officials didn't work.
Before that, there were 59 completely evidence free election challenges. All of which were dismissed.
The Nevada ruling could have rested content with laches, but went beyond that to address the paucity of the evidence. Similar happened in Georgia and Wisconsin.
PA spanked his challenges too.
In 2020, Trump ran against the election as such.
He's still doing it.
tweet free on this page, DMC. all personal takes.
come get you one.
When have I asked you to pick a side? Why do the same few of you continue to roll call for your team games? "Do you believe this? Do you believe that? I'd bet you believe it, I'm sure you do... you won't deny it.. do you?"
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
