Page 34 of 36 FirstFirst ... 2430313233343536 LastLast
Results 826 to 850 of 889
  1. #826
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    was my compound question too difficult for you?

    I don't do boxed in scenarios where your opinion is followed up with a conclusion and then a "yes or no" attached that assumed the premises are all true.

  2. #827
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    Did I ask you? Yes or no?
    You weren't specific

  3. #828
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    11,449
    He eventually becomes a chicken in pretty much every conversation he enters.

    Almost every right winger here will end up stonewalling when asked what he actually thinks. It's uncanny and hilarious.
    At least you explain why he triggered you. Progress.

  4. #829
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    131,441
    At least you explain why he triggered you. Progress.
    He triggers laughter in me. He put me on ignore because I corrected his galaxy brain on the usage of imply and infer. His ego couldn't take it.

  5. #830
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    11,449
    He triggers laughter in me. He put me on ignore because I corrected his galaxy brain on the usage of imply and infer. His ego couldn't take it.
    Some of that is true, some of that is narrative.

  6. #831
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    Typical tactic of the left/center-left here...

    Left wing Poster A makes sloppy, broad brush comment, gets called out.
    Left wing Poster A makes a sloppy retort in defense
    Left wing Poster B shows up and makes a different defense, gets called out for the original claim
    Left wing Poster B denies ever making the original claim, even though poster B is defending it
    Left wing Poster C shows up, defends original claim, defends poster B
    Left wing Poster C gets called out, denies caring about the original claim, denies supporting Poster B, still wants a back and forth about the original claim.
    Left wing Poster D shows up, posts a strawman meme about the attack on the original claim
    The responses pretty much cease because of the web of that's developed,
    Left wing Poster E calls fold

    rinse and repeat

  7. #832
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    131,441
    1) Left winger starts discussion on some topic.

    2) DMC says "Whaddaboutdis?" and argues about the personal lives of posters for two weeks.

  8. #833
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    I don't do boxed in scenarios where your opinion is followed up with a conclusion and then a "yes or no" attached that assumed the premises are all true.
    You're lazy and dishonest, no skin off my butt.

  9. #834
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    84,152
    That's ing rich. The fact you got booted for your angry, tired schtick where people like derp can't manage that and the giant fact you continually molest your targets of affection with the same tired lines and condescension that holds zero merit and you want to talk about what rep means to someone.

    And, of course, you're a proven loser if you manage to get perma-banned here.


    You're Blue derp. You have man crushes on people who always on you. You try sooooooo hard to impress people but few ever acknowledge you and at least derp has kori and chris sometimes.

    Objectively, almost nothing separates you and derp, except derp has two-three friends and more people pay him attention while you grovel at ankles for attention.


    Poor guy. walks like a ducks, talks like a ducks, just not as smart as a ducks.


    throw the damn towel tbh

  10. #835
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Post Count
    53,910
    You're lazy and dishonest, no skin off my butt.
    You could set him in there on your Ignore group, Winester.

    tee, hee.

  11. #836
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    I don't do boxed in scenarios where your opinion is followed up with a conclusion and then a "yes or no" attached that assumed the premises are all true.
    I just asked your opinion about whether Trump's post-election shenanigans are consistent with the norms of representative democracy as you conceive it.

    Straight opinion, no true/false determinations necessary unless you choose to take it up point by point.
    Last edited by Winehole23; 06-03-2021 at 12:29 PM.

  12. #837
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Post Count
    1,676
    That's ing rich. The fact you got booted for your angry, tired schtick where people like derp can't manage that and the giant fact you continually molest your targets of affection with the same tired lines and condescension that holds zero merit and you want to talk about what rep means to someone.

    And, of course, you're a proven loser if you manage to get perma-banned here.


    You're Blue derp. You have man crushes on people who always on you. You try sooooooo hard to impress people but few ever acknowledge you and at least derp has kori and chris sometimes.

    Objectively, almost nothing separates you and derp, except derp has two-three friends and more people pay him attention while you grovel at ankles for attention.


    Poor guy. walks like a ducks, talks like a ducks, just not as smart as a ducks.

    I’ll bet you don’t see any irony in this post.

  13. #838
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    I don't do boxed in scenarios where your opinion is followed up with a conclusion and then a "yes or no" attached that assumed the premises are all true.
    If you dispute the pemises, why not say that?

    If that was the case here, which premises struck you as bad?

  14. #839
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Post Count
    1,676

    Why aren’t you capable of just admitting you’re a party of trump guy? You vote for all of them. You didn’t even vote against trump.

    why would continue to pretend you’re not a supporter

  15. #840
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    11,449
    I’ll bet you don’t see any irony in this post.
    LOL, you got punked into switching your schtick.

    LOL, blue derp flag waving.

    Wiping my ass with your scalp rn.

  16. #841
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Post Count
    11,449
    Why aren’t you capable of just admitting you’re a party of trump guy? You vote for all of them. You didn’t even vote against trump.

    why would continue to pretend you’re not a supporter
    Just stop. You're a clown. NO ONE likes you.

    You are fighting with derp for most sad piece of on this board.

    You're so sad, my words are making you walk your -schtick back miles.

  17. #842
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    You're lazy and dishonest, no skin off my butt.

  18. #843
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    I just asked your opinion about whether Trump's post-election shenanigans are consistent with the norms of representative democracy as you conceive it.

    Straight opinion, no true/false determinations necessary unless you choose to take it up point by point.
    Hardly. You monologued first.

    If the 3 branches are intact, then the judicial system should be able to handle whatever bull legislation is pushed. The supreme court will decide on the cons utionality of it. You didn't seem to mind with the Bill of Rights.

    "Anything goes as long as I get my way" sets a precedence, you've nary room to wine from your hole about it when it bites you in the ass.

  19. #844
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    .
    Last edited by Winehole23; 06-03-2021 at 01:34 PM.

  20. #845
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    I’ll bet you don’t see any irony in this post.
    I'll bet you don't see your own feet.

  21. #846
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    Were Trump's post election shenanigans consistent with the norms of our representative republic, in your opinion?
    Explain what the "norms" are.

  22. #847
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    Explain what the "norms" are.
    Whatever your conception of them may be. If it's any easier, you can just say whether you think DJT's post election shenanigans, including his attempts to corrupt public officials, were consistent with representative republicanism.
    Last edited by Winehole23; 06-03-2021 at 01:42 PM.

  23. #848
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    Lol pretending to be ignorant of the meaning of norms

  24. #849
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    83,128
    Whatever your conception of them may be. If it's any easier, you can just say whether you think DJT's post election shenanigans, including his attempts to corrupt public officials, were consistent with representative republicanism.


    Why did you delete your post?

    What do you mean "consistent with"?

    Did the 3 branches of the federal government fall by the wayside?

    Based on the history of this country, Watergate, Whitewater, all the lying, selling nuclear secrets, paying to whack a POTUS and a civil rights leader, and all the other ty things our leaders have done, I'd say it might have upped the ante but it didn't change the game.

  25. #850
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    70,616
    For example, there used to be a norm not to challenge lost elections frivolously or otherwise, because doing so impairs confidence in US elections and might cause violence and unrest.

    Though Trump was within his rights to exhaust legal recourses, by ignoring the norm and filing dozens of evidence free challenges and insisting he won, he undermined a fair election and fomented an attack on the US government.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •