Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 92 of 92
  1. #76
    Because I choose to. Neo.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Milwaukee Bucks
    Post Count
    3,436
    Does anyone still talk about Defense around here? It has never been easier to score. What's the big deal.
    was pretty darn easy through most of the 80s when there was no zone and no one even gave effort on defense other than the occasional hard foul when they felt disrespected

  2. #77
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,070
    Derozan was better?
    Well obviously

  3. #78
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,070
    Does anyone still talk about Defense around here? It has never been easier to score. What's the big deal.
    I agree, defense is better today

  4. #79
    Believe. Dirks_Finale's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    4,096
    Does anyone still talk about Defense around here? It has never been easier to score. What's the big deal.
    Not sexy so it's been outlawed by the league, tbh.

  5. #80
    adolis is altuve’s father monosylab1k's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    15,817
    Scoring in the 80’s was at the same level as now, and they weren’t shooting 3’s

    But yeah, sure, it was great defense because McHale clotheslined Rambis.

  6. #81
    Because I choose to. Neo.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Milwaukee Bucks
    Post Count
    3,436
    Not sexy so it's been outlawed by the league, tbh.
    proof?

    because we've already pretty well covered the rules aspect a number of times with you, and shown that the rules actually allowed for more defense to be played and that you and many others have had a wrong understanding of a specific rule that had actually been in place since the 70s and continues to be called very infrequently as it pretty much always has

    so whats your angle now? or are you just going to stick with claims proven to be factually incorrect both in rule and in observation?

  7. #82
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,070
    Scoring in the 80’s was at the same level as now, and they weren’t shooting 3’s

    But yeah, sure, it was great defense because McHale clotheslined Rambis.

    “muhtoughnessphysicalera”

  8. #83
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    96,286
    I can agree with that and Kobe being third overall is no slight. ALSO Kobe bad shot selection was ego not IQ driven which is actually worse. Bron willingness to trust scrubs and to take less bad shots than Kobe and even MJ should be admired. Mj still the GOAT though
    in lakers franchise history, maybe

  9. #84
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,070
    in lakers franchise history, maybe
    Lebron, AD, West, Kream, Shaq, Magic, Eddie Jordan, Pau, Mikan, Baylor, Worthy, Nixon, Wilkes, Dwert, Wilt all ahead of Kobme tbh….
    Last edited by lefty; 10-03-2021 at 05:32 PM.

  10. #85
    Veteran Killakobe81's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    36,551
    in lakers franchise history, maybe
    I meant in comparison to MJ and Bron ...
    I have said many times Kobe is somewhere between 6 and 10.

  11. #86
    Believe. Dirks_Finale's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    4,096
    proof?

    because we've already pretty well covered the rules aspect a number of times with you, and shown that the rules actually allowed for more defense to be played and that you and many others have had a wrong understanding of a specific rule that had actually been in place since the 70s and continues to be called very infrequently as it pretty much always has

    so whats your angle now? or are you just going to stick with claims proven to be factually incorrect both in rule and in observation?
    Yeah, it's called Steve Nash's career trajectory. From tier 3 star to back to back MVP as soon they changed the rules. Not coincidental.

  12. #87
    Because I choose to. Neo.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Milwaukee Bucks
    Post Count
    3,436
    Yeah, it's called Steve Nash's career trajectory. From tier 3 star to back to back MVP as soon they changed the rules. Not coincidental.
    except 1) the only rule that changed was allowing zone defense and 2) he went to a completely new situation

    so basically you're going to stick with fake news because you have absolutely nowhere else to go to back up your crappy take. got it

  13. #88
    Believe. Dirks_Finale's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    4,096
    Haha yeah sure the Don Nelson Mavs were slow it down grind it out right? Keep reaching

  14. #89
    Believe. Dirks_Finale's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    4,096
    Off topic for a moment - does everyone here over the age of 40 agree that Nash was the worst back to back MVP in NBA history and that Mark Price > Nash?

  15. #90
    Because I choose to. Neo.'s Avatar
    My Team
    Milwaukee Bucks
    Post Count
    3,436
    Haha yeah sure the Don Nelson Mavs were slow it down grind it out right? Keep reaching
    lol whining about reaching then subsequently thinking the nelson mavs were built anything remotely like d'antoni suns

  16. #91
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,281
    Duncan goes to Orlando a few decades ago and we are mentioning him in the GOAT conversation on the regular, imo. I think playing in the spur's system cost him personal accolades.
    Maybe some people would see it that way, but they would be wrong. Tim was the Spurs system for many years, he made the whole thing work, and if anything he should get more credit for being the sole superstar on multiple championship teams. If he had played with a co-superstar, that would make his career less impressive.

    That's always the #1 criticism of other GOAT-tier players. "Kareem needed Oscar and Magic." "Jordan needed Pippen." "Shaq and Kobe needed each other." Duncan needed...David Robinson with degenerative disc disease, a shoot-first point guard, and a 6th man specialist.
    Last edited by Arcadian; 10-04-2021 at 02:59 PM.

  17. #92
    TheDrewShow is salty lefty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    100,070
    proof?

    because we've already pretty well covered the rules aspect a number of times with you, and shown that the rules actually allowed for more defense to be played and that you and many others have had a wrong understanding of a specific rule that had actually been in place since the 70s and continues to be called very infrequently as it pretty much always has

    so whats your angle now? or are you just going to stick with claims proven to be factually incorrect both in rule and in observation?
    Agreed tbh

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •