This is you still wanting to talk about your personal life. Deny it all you like. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Your words are there for anyone to read who would care either way.
I guess you don't know the difference between showing and telling.
I knew you'd make that comparison and you'll pretend showing and telling are the same things or that you know more about my intent than I did.
This is you still wanting to talk about your personal life. Deny it all you like. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Your words are there for anyone to read who would care either way.
DMC still up at 2am trying to prove he's not interested in SR's personal life by relentlessly talking about his personal life.
That is what happens when you are definitely not a confident heterosexual.
For the umpteenth time i have no issue talking about my personal life. This whole exercise is about your supposed not caring about it while very clearly caring about it
But it's important in a school shooting thread to figure out whether or not you'd date a tranny
fify
To gauge SR21’s interest in a hypothetical Poster B in a school shooting thread.
How many times can you ignore your mistakes ITT? You just keep moving to the next thing and ignoring all the silly you've said that I've debunked.
wasnt a mistake.
but you know what, i'll throw you a bone. you want to know more about my personal life. fine. i'll explain what you appear to be so confused about. here is the quote you are convinced is a contradiction
so the scenario where i said i have no way of actually knowing is specific to cir stances where i may have seen people at bars or coffee shops, or on a school campus. ie you walk by someone, think "oh, theyre cute." however, upon glancing at a woman who in that moment i think is good looking... its possible that the person is a passing trans woman. i'd have no way of knowing for sure in that context.
just because in that context i couldn't know doesnt mean that i'd want to date that person. its like saying i wouldnt date a woman who believes that trump is the second coming of christ. if i saw a good looking woman one day at the market, id have no way of knowing if she believes that or not. you are taking that to mean that i would definitely date her.
amazing staying power for this tangent due to one poster's incessant curiosity
Yup, will not slow down his grooming attempt.
the ST Avengers gathering again for a remake.
So it wasn't a mistake when you said I started the conversation about your personal life?
So it wasn't a mistake when you said "do you have any other questions about my personal life?"
So it wasn't a mistake when you said I keep asking questions about your personal life?
If these weren't mistakes then you're just dishonest.
But as far as what I quoted that you just responded to...
So is show the same as tell?
Get that one straight first.
There are so many issues with your takes regarding that topic that unpacking it all could require a psychiatrist.just because in that context i couldn't know doesnt mean that i'd want to date that person. its like saying i wouldnt date a woman who believes that trump is the second coming of christ. if i saw a good looking woman one day at the market, id have no way of knowing if she believes that or not. you are taking that to mean that i would definitely date her.
"Avengers"
Keep modifying the board with the most recent comments, WH. I guess you've tried for bingo for well over a year now so you have to start improvising
i dont care who brought it up. you then kept asking questions about my personal life.
if i brought up my personal life and you didnt care about it, you wouldnt engage with it and continue asking follow up questions
You said I started the conversation. Were you mistaken?
If you brought it up?if i brought up my personal life and you didnt care about it, you wouldnt engage with it and continue asking follow up questions
So you did indeed start the conversation about your personal life
That was the 1st comment about it, and it was from you.
Then you said this after Dale asked you a series of "personal" questions..
Then I said this (the only question I asked before you went on your "muh personal life" meltdown)
This was clearly to gauge whether or not the story Mono (herein referred to as "monkey") recalled was truly about you, not to call you out but to point out the mix up and obvious double standard (it's ok when you do it because you're more left, but not ok when someone else does it who's on the right).
So continue the professional misdirection about your personal life now that the facts are represented. You did indeed bring up your personal life, in every instance. I did not ask "follow up questions" other than the slipknot question. The rest of the discussion was merely commentary, not questions.
Almost had that one on my card.
Last edited by Ef-man; 10-10-2021 at 01:14 PM.
you love taking conversations on absurd tangents when they aren't going your way.
but you are the one who brought up my years old post about when i lived with my parents. you started the conversation. you then jumped an and starting talking about how you thought my college experience did or should have changed by politics. or about my dad's politics. you are the one who was interested enough in my personal life to continue prodding about it.
i dont care if i was already having a conversation with dale. if you werent interested in my personal life, you didnt have to get involved in that conversation. but you very evidently do care. and that's fine.
then when i brought up how you always seem to take a keen interest in my personal life, such as your past questions about my sexual preferences, instead of showing just how much you dont care, you tried reviving that conversation . you cant control yourself.
unfamiliar with how bingo cards work
Keep dodging.
No, you started the conversation as I clearly illustrated above and you admitted to. I did not say anything about you. I quoted your post. I just said something about Mono.but you are the one who brought up my years old post about when i lived with my parents. you started the conversation. you then jumped an and starting talking about how you thought my college experience did or should have changed by politics. or about my dad's politics. you are the one who was interested enough in my personal life to continue prodding about it.
You started talking about your college and your dad's politics I only commented on what you said in this thread.
You still cannot show questions I asked about your personal life.
It's a public forum. Everyone is involved. I laughed at you. If laughing at you is caring, then there's a lot of caring happening here between the left and the right.
i dont care if i was already having a conversation with dale. if you werent interested in my personal life, you didnt have to get involved in that conversation. but you very evidently do care. and that's fine.
Then when you lied and showed no evidence, and instead dragged up another old conversation where once again I was challenging your comments, not making commentary on your personal life, I pointed out to you again that there was a contradiction in your logic. You chose to go into a sermon about yourself. I merely asked a hypothetical question - if you think the two are indistinguishable, how can you say you're more attracted to one than the other? This caused you no end of processing difficulties you're obviously struggling with even today.then when i brought up how you always seem to take a keen interest in my personal life, such as your past questions about my sexual preferences, instead of showing just how much you dont care, you tried reviving that conversation . you cant control yourself.
Same you said last time. You don't know how that particular meme works.
sucks to be you
keep replying to DMC Bingo takes, that'll make em go away for sure
:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)