Reply With Quote
Of what?
I'm a contrarian. I don't need to believe what I am saying, I just have to have better argument than you. It's not difficult with you in particular.more anonymity
You admitted upstream you don’t represent yourself truthfully. You white-knight for the downtrodden morons who can’t complete a thought because you like to battle uphill.
So you’re posting a bunch of bull you don’t actually agree with for the sake of arguing, but it’s somehow more respectable because it’s being posted from the DMC handle…the fat handed boomer from North Austin that loves to fish and drives a dodge (or two)
Of what?
DMC has alts?
You admitted upstream you don’t represent yourself truthfully. You white-knight for the downtrodden morons who can’t complete a thought because you like to battle uphill.
So you’re posting a bunch of bull you don’t actually agree with for the sake of arguing, but it’s somehow more respectable because it’s being posted from the DMC handle…the fat handed boomer from North Austin that loves to fish and drives a dodge (or two)
How many?
lol chest thumping
You admitted upstream you don’t represent yourself truthfully. You white-knight for the downtrodden morons who can’t complete a thought because you like to battle uphill.
So you’re posting a bunch of bull you don’t actually agree with for the sake of arguing, but it’s somehow more respectable because it’s being posted from the DMC handle…the fat handed boomer from North Austin that loves to fish and drives a dodge (or two)
What’s worse talking out of both sides of your mouth under the same handle or posting the same under an alt?
No idea if he has alts. What did I say in that post that made you think that?
"posted from the DMC handle" might imply there are others. or not.
philo
Ah. Was not meant to imply he has Alts. He may, but based on his boomer logic itt seems like he actually takes some pride in the credibility he thinks he’s established as DMC. Completely oblivious to the fact that a person that will take any side of an argument for the sake of an argument is just someone addicted to an online argument. I guess you can take pride in that. I wouldn’t.
Wow. When DarrinS has a more creative alt…you think the Antichrist alt was a drunk or sober epiphany for darrin?
i'm the OG Philo that dubbed you. Game recognize game
I told you my alts though. Neither were obnoxious edge lords who would have themselves if anyone found out.
Sybok was always a hilarious alt tbh.
boomer addicted to an online argument. Glad we’re on the same page wrt who DMC is as an online personality on the important platform that is spurstalk.
Now take a look at your post count, and take a few minutes to learn the concept of time we’ll spent. I’m sure the precision of the online arguments you’ve honed over all those months/years meets the definition.
White flag from the argument addict.
Damn
Ppl care too much about this site
Get out more nigs. Its a short life
yall are weird
This thread basically sums up the current ST political forum
Thank God we have posters like hater and thread to barely have this subforum drag forward on its belly
You spend more time on this site than anyone.Damn
Ppl care too much about this site
Get out more nigs. Its a short life
This subforum wold.be a rotten worm eaten carcass without me nigYou spend more time on this site than anyone.
Mmm. Questionable hypothesis tbh. Credit for the corona thread but generally speaking pretty low value tbh.This subforum wold.be a rotten worm eaten carcass without me nig
Yeah I probably don't remember this because it had nothing to do with me.
You're like a 4th grade girl who tries to govern her classmates base on a warped understanding of her teacher's rules.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions