Reply With Quote
Yawn.
Chumpy with another desperate fabrication.
Strawman mountain.
Irrelevant, according to you. The killer's feelings are the only things to be considered.
Yawn.
Chumpy with another desperate fabrication.
Yes i have heard that.
Evidence needs to be 100% in all cases.
But with corrupt, or at the least imperfect courts no guarantee of 100 of 100 cases.
I concur.
Still thinking of me while you pretend you'd homicide someone who exhibits the same sexual predator behaviors you've routinely demonstrated over the years.I don't believe in plea deals? When did i post that?
Don't tell me your other troll is DMC - False Charge Chunko?
Realistically, based on your contradictory rhetoric, you should kill yourself. No one will miss you, more kitty litter on the shelves and most importantly, children in your locale are safe. Triple win.
So now you're saying he shouldn't have murdered the guy?Yawn.
Chumpy with another desperate fabrication.
Pick a lane.
Nah, gs wouldn't even attempt anything. He's literally trying to pretend he's upset about something he's lusted over for years. Dude's New Avante, but nowhere near as entertaining or intellectual. Probably poorer and we've seen Avante's lady was a dish in her day and he has kids. gs couldn't pull trim of that level that without a weapon and a mask.
If he had 100% proof this was the guy, then off him.
If not, he should not have.
Now you pick a lane.
I already have.
Never changed.
Who determines the 100%?
I do.
It's sounding like his daughter could have ID'd the wrong guy.
Or, she got into it willingly and then pinned it on autistic dude.
My investigation is not complete.
You rely on corrupt courts and taxpayer draining nonsense.
How are you going to tell the guy it's OK to kill the alleged trafficker when you're 100% sure?
He should have determined 100% or not on his own.
He's going to have to deal with the courts now.
The courts can have a measure of justice.
I'm about 80% sure he thought he was 100% sure.
And he would have to deal with the courts regardless.
Right, but what info and by whom was that info given that made Dad think to a 100% degree of certainty the autistic dude Sorenson sold his daughter?
Daughters interview needs to be posted.
The law doesn't care where you got your info from.
By his own standards he did.
Was that good enough?
I'm talking to you. I've quoted you twice.
It was 100% by his standards.
Was that good enough?
At this point i do not know what information Dad received.
Much more info needs to come out re this case.
Was Sorenson indeed the seller of her thus Dad got 100% correct? Unknown at this time.
Is the step family truthful that Sorenson was soo developmentally disabled that he did not have the capacity to offer girl to trafficers? Unverfiied.
OP
But his feelings were that he had 100%.
Is that not good enough for your feelings?
This is your feelings-based justice system. I'm just trying to understand it.
Chumpy I'm going to a football game.
Since you want to discuss your feelings i will not be available.
OP
tell us what you find major reacher
You will still be afraid to talk about your feelings-based justice system when you get back.
Investigation still ongoing.
Step daughter and alleged sex traffic victim Ashleye Kross' information absolutely needs to be brought out. Ashleye Kross now purportedly in California.
If she fabricated this story that Sorenson (the now deceased) kidnapped and sold her she should be looking at inciting and aiding a murder charge.
Both the FBI and Washington State Patrol said there is no sex trafficking investigation into the victim.”
In an email to NBC News, Chris Loftis, a spokesman for the Washington State Patrol, confirmed that the agency “is not involved with any investigation involving Mr. Sorensen.”
Man who allegedly killed daughter’s boyfriend is no ‘hero,’ grieving family says (yahoo.com)
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions