Reply With Quote
I put you in a zugzwang. You know it.
DOD thinks their 140K imperial warriors deployed in 140 countries is just perfect, so no need to reduce
I put you in a zugzwang. You know it.
Not really an answer to my question.So were you too stupid to realize the problems with your cherry picked data, or too lazy to fact check, or knew about the problems and are just not honest enough to admit it?
There is some reasoned criticism of your ed, lazy statistics, and your rejoinder, that it "is a legit measure" is just repeating an unsupported assertion.
You follow it up with claiming that I don't accept it because "it goes against your narrative". I agree with the snopes critiques, because they are better reasoned.
Soooo you have here:
1) simply repeated original assertion
2) an ad hominem "you reject my statistics because because it goes against your beliefs"
3) a strawman logical fallacy distorting my reasons which are, in fact, that the selection of the data was problematic from a statistical standpoint, to "you only believe it because you want to"
None of which really answer my question.
Stupid, lazy, or dishonest?
Not mutually exclusive.
You are like the schroedingers cat of sophism. All three at the same time.
Death toll up to 4.
They killed cubby before he shoplifted in another store. Does anyone know if wheelchair is available? Asking for a Poster B.
Tucson police officer fired after fatally shooting man in a wheelchair, officials say.
A Tucson police officer was fired Tuesday after fatally shooting a man in a motorized wheelchair who was accused of shoplifting and pulling a knife when confronted outside a Walmart, officials said.
Video released by the Tucson Police Department showed Officer Ryan Remington several steps behind the man in the wheelchair, identified by police as 61-year-old Richard Lee Richards. The officer asked Richards to stop before firing nine rounds -- striking him in the back and side -- as the man headed into another store, according to police.
Cops killed cubby
RIP young man
Ezekiel 23:30
There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.
Did the cops take him to Burger King for a whooper meal?
Damn ya. Ya's lucked out. I figured after the Xmas parade murders I was a roll.
Nope.
Just sharing the news, tbh, I though we discussed this particular lower court ruling back in the day, but I couldn't find the original thread.What’s next: The plaintiffs plan to appeal the ruling, attorney C.D. Michel said in an email, citing dissenting opinions suggesting a challenge would be "appropriate." That could put the case before the U.S. Supreme Court, where conservative justices wield a 6-3 majority.
https://www.politico.com/states/cali...azines-9427914
Supreme Court seems poised to expand Second Amendment rights and strike down NY handgun law
https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/03/politics/supreme-court-second-amendment-new-york-bruen/index.html
Will be so nice to soon have shall issue instead of may issue in California
Frankly, I don't think it's as clear-cut as it sounds or similar to the NY handgun law (which deals with concealed carry).
My wife has been taught how to pack bullet wounds as part of her ongoing professional training.
Bend Over, I'll show you how to pack a bullet wound
Michigan high school reports sudden decrease in bullying
Not really an answer to my question.
There is some reasoned criticism of your ed, lazy statistics, and your rejoinder, that it "is a legit measure" is just repeating an unsupported assertion.
You follow it up with claiming that I don't accept it because "it goes against your narrative". I agree with the snopes critiques, because they are better reasoned.
Soooo you have here:
1) simply repeated original assertion
2) an ad hominem "you reject my statistics because because it goes against your beliefs"
3) a strawman logical fallacy distorting my reasons which are, in fact, that the selection of the data was problematic from a statistical standpoint, to "you only believe it because you want to"
None of which really answer my question.
Stupid, lazy, or dishonest?
Not mutually exclusive.
You are like the schroedingers cat of sophism. All three at the same time.
It's "Schrödinger". Stick to speed limit signs.
And uptick in gun safe purchases.
Ezekiel 25:17
The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides
By the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men
Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will
Shepherds the weak through the valley of darkness
For he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children
And I will strike down upon thee
With great vengeance and furious anger
Those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers
And you will know my name is the Lord
When I lay my vengeance upon thee
If libs get their way kids will have to use their dad's revolver to shoot their classmates
but does he look like a ?
Trump comedy festival in here.
No, I drove to her far western podunk state to try to get back with her. Twice. Twice this year alone, once in spring and once in late summer. That . Even though she had a baby that wasn't mine and made me pay for over a thousand bucks worth of Similac and other misc crap for her, including panties that another man will inevitably be taking off of her at some point. .
Nice one, cuck.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
