No, people Google to get more information after hearing about a story on social media or from other people.
Are you telling me that when you hear about a big story, let's say Travis Scott, your next move to get more information is to look for a Travis Scott article on a news website's home page?
DMC reduced to rubber/glue bads
"hear about"
How exactly would I hear about this? I don't do social media, don't "follow" anyone. If I want information on something I already know about, Google is fine. Otherwise you'd have to know about it first, and if that wasn't through the news outlet in question then there's likely a reason for that.
The fact remains that the news outlet who avoids or downplays the stories about their own issues is approximately blacking out the story for their own viewers.
Spin that how you like.
You might get news alerts on your phone. You might watch TV. You might talk to other humans.
Or you might check a news website's home page. Like other old people who are out of touch with technology. It's fine!
FoxNews.com doesn't have it on their home page either. So either they're hiding it too, or it's just not front page news because, while this guy may work for CNN, no one knows who the he is.The fact remains that the news outlet who avoids or downplays the stories about their own issues is approximately blacking out the story for their own viewers.
Spin that how you like.
Once upon a time in merry old Europe, it was customary to execute soldiers who too stubbornly defended an indefensible position.
In this case there's no need, since DMC is approximately putting his own opinion to the sword with his outlandishly stilted take.
DMC believes in the same kinds of conspiracy theories all the other Trump s believe in. He's just more flowery in his language describing them.
I don't get news alerts on my phone. They'd have to come from somewhere.
I don't watch TV news. Even if I did the outlet with the issue would have to be reporting it otherwise the concept is the same.
People I associate with don't talk about Travis Scott. How in' old are you?
I promise you, I'd run circles around you where technology is concerned. I just don't consider TMZ level buzz and social media "technology".
Or you might check a news website's home page. Like other old people who are out of touch with technology. It's fine!
I don't watch Fox and don't visit their site and I indicted them just the same as CNN. They ignored the Cuomo thing for a while, until they couldn't. Fox did the same with O'Reilly.FoxNews.com doesn't have it on their home page either. So either they're hiding it too, or it's just not front page news because, while this guy may work for CNN, no one knows who the he is.
Newspapers and Television have been neutral arbiters of information approximately never, DMC is just pissed that the legacy media by and large doesn't flatter his biases.
"flatters my biases" = impartial
"flatters your biases" = BIASED!
This DMC meltdown is quite entertaining
Look we've already established how YOU don't get your news, you don't have to convince me. I'm just telling you what most other people do. (And implying the Astroworld incident was some fringe topic of conversation among Zoomers doesn't exactly help your case that you're not out of touch.)
We haven't even mentioned the likely fact that you actually get a lot of your information from Spurstalk.com given how much time you spend here.
The crux of your issue here is you want the criminal activity of a "senior producer" who works at CNN to be bigger news, even though you've never heard of this person before and you probably don't know what a senior producer does. You just don't like CNN. Hey, I don't either!
"100% of the time" -WH23
I find CNN annoying and bad, approximately always. 100% do not watch.
Occasionally they do primary reporting.
going with misleading pull quotes, like an honest broker does
100% of the time. Approx is assumed.
Yup, he is getting beat down for being an idiot.
He’s already going for The Derp Gambit of mass posting until everyone else gets tired and leaves, then declaring victory.
And will call “echo chamber” for being curb stomped.
almost 100% =/= 100%
you also ignored, for once in your life, the semantic difference. I guess conflation is your thing today instead of hairsplitting.
Last edited by Winehole23; 12-12-2021 at 03:07 PM.
I think I've said this to you before at some point
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)