Reply With Quote
addressing absent posters like I said.
It's not totalitarianism, but the tweeter isn't far off otherwise.
y'all are crazy about picking on s, for some reason. it's definitely a right wing seasonal flavor.
You spam tweets all night and day for years and you have the gall to say someone else is orating to absent posters
addressing absent posters like I said.
It's not totalitarianism, but the tweeter isn't far off otherwise.
y'all are crazy about picking on s, for some reason. it's definitely a right wing seasonal flavor.
Boiled down, not totalitarianism, like I said. Why you're stressing over something you basically agreed with is a mystery.
I'm picking on you, .
Just call em gots, classic DMC
(minimizes and dismisses DeSantis using state power to strong-arm people and businesses who merely criticize his policies, because of course he does.)
Here's the right wing's paragon of anti-wokism going full Goebbels, demonizing non Europeans, railing at "the internationalist left" and tickling postmodern blood purity mania:
The second challenge is migration, which you could call population replacement or inundation. There is an outstanding 1973 book on this issue which was written in French, and recently published in Hungary. It is called “The Camp of the Saints” [Le Camp des Saints], and I recommend it to anyone who wants to understand the spiritual developments underlying the West’s inability to defend itself.https://abouthungary.hu/speeches-and...d-student-campIn such a multi-ethnic context, there is an ideological feint here that is worth talking about and focusing on. The internationalist left employs a feint, an ideological ruse: the claim – their claim – that Europe by its very nature is populated by peoples of mixed race. This is a historical and semantic sleight of hand, because it conflates two different things. There is a world in which European peoples are mixed together with those arriving from outside Europe. Now that is a mixed-race world. And there is our world, where people from within Europe mix with one another, move around, work, and relocate. So, for example, in the Carpathian Basin we are not mixed-race: we are simply a mixture of peoples living in our own European homeland. And, given a favourable alignment of stars and a following wind, these peoples merge together in a kind of Hungaro-Pannonian sauce, creating their own new European culture. This is why we have always fought: we are willing to mix with one another, but we do not want to become peoples of mixed-race. This is why we fought at Nándorfehérvár/Belgrade, this is why we stopped the Turks at Vienna, and – if I am not mistaken – this is why, in still older times – the French stopped the Arabs at Poitiers. Today the situation is that Islamic civilisation, which is constantly moving towards Europe, has realised – precisely because of the traditions of Belgrade/Nándorfehérvár – that the route through Hungary is an unsuitable one along which to send its people up into Europe. This is why Poitiers has been replayed; now the incursion’s origins are not in the East, but in the South, from where they are occupying and flooding the West. This might not yet be a very important task for us, but it will be for our children, who will need to defend themselves not only from the South, but also from the West. The time will come when we have to somehow accept Christians coming to us from there and integrate them into our lives. This has happened before; and those whom we do not want to let in will have to be stopped at our western borders – Schengen or no Schengen. But this is not the task of the moment, and not a task for our lifetime. Our task is solely to prepare our children to be able to do this. As [House Speaker] László Kövér has said in an interview, we must make sure that good times do not create weak men, and that those weak men do not bring hard times upon our people.
Last edited by Winehole23; 07-31-2022 at 10:47 AM.
(Viktor Orban will be a featured speaker at this year's CPAC in Dallas, what better way to muster the racist, anti-liberal right wing for a post-democratic future.)
broadly speaking, anti-wokism is a revolt against political and social equality for women and nonwhites. freedom for all is experienced as deprivation and denounced as political oppression, just as it was in the reconstruction by the defeated confederacy.
with newly installed revanchist, right wing SC justices, turning the political clock back to the 19th century is a live possibility, they've already turned it back 50 years for women, and the recent EPA ruling portends a return to the pre-1937 Lochner Era.
"Your child may not read it because I wouldn't want my child to read it" is a good illustration of the will to power involved.
"My religious beliefs trump the free availability of information to your child (for whom it may be appropriate) at the library."
Also expressed: an unrealistic wish to control children and limit what they see. We're not talking about porn here.
Have you ever seen a liberal agenda you won't stump for?
pearl clutching at the mere existence of exotic outré materials at the school library.
that's one of the good things, silly
nothing but emojis, debate captain.
Interesting how you'll take the liberal stance on every issue and vehemently support it by gas lighting the forum in hopes of convincing someone your social awareness XP is maxxed out.pearl clutching at the mere existence of exotic outré materials at the school library.
that's one of the good things, silly
Am I supposed to debate an absent poster?
No topical take, pure towel snapping.
Think I'll stick with my uber-liberal take that libraries are good.
cool with me if you've got nothing to say, nuh-uh is super persuasive.
Just using your line of reasoning. When you hide from jumping to conclusions because you're too melty to read, a tweet is an absent poster yet you spent your adult life here posting tweets with little to no commentary of your own.
Suck it
you're barely making any sense, gramps
it's called risk management. take up with the BIS.
https://www.bis.org/publ/othp54.pdfSociety faces the challenge of managing climate change risks. To play their part, central banks across theglobe created the Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS)with the aim of contributing to effective climate-related risk management and the transition to a sustainable economy. While many central banks do not have a formal mandate to incorporate sustainability issues into their mission, some have noted that doing so is consistent with existing mandates. These central banks may decide to incorporate climate-related risks into their risk frameworks and, thus, improve their decision-making processes given the impact of climate risks on their mission and/or objectives. Central banks may have a more direct role to play through their international foreign reserves, where they hold portfolios of sovereign and other assets that may be exposed to both physical and transition risks associated with climate change. This report focuses on the methodological and data challenges faced by central banks as they consider climate-related risks as part of their reserve management frameworks. A significant methodological challenge is the difficulty in modelling climate factors and their connection to portfolio risk and return characteristics. The lack of comprehensive, timely and accurate climate risk data is another key challenge for reserve managers. Additionally, incorporating environmental social, and governance (ESG) considerations into international reserve management frameworks would need to be aligned with the pillars of safety, liquidity and profitability and also be consistent with central banks’ legal mandates. Despite these challenges, some reserve managers are gradually adding climate-related risk metrics into their risk management frameworks and are improving the disclosure.
DMC has more attention from STers than actual discussion.
He/we broke y'all.
^^^yet another conservative whiner who can't find the topic at all, only petty grievance at getting dunked on
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
