No, the mayor of Uvalde called him that.
So it was a stupid comparison, got it.
No, the mayor of Uvalde called him that.
it's totally irrelevant what the laws are MEANT for when they don't always deter crime. The fact that there is crime is self evident that laws are not always a deterrent.
Sickening.
It was made in the context that the war on drugs has historically penalized minorities disproportionately and the war on guns would result in the exact same thing, so yeah it was absolutely appropriate
nobody said "always"
i didnt say that passing laws prevents things from happening 100% of the time. my question was, if we made murder legal, should we expect to see an increase in homicides? the answer is obviously yes.
prohibition, for all the problems associated with it, did decrease alcohol consumption levels. note that i am not claiming that prohibition completely eliminated alcohol consumption.
So the report is out he was angry he did not graduate according to his neighbor
by your logic i guess we should just abolish child rape laws because people will do it anyway right? you see how incredibly stupid you sound?
I just read a report too: You still have for brains.
again, no one is advocating doing away with laws. That's your straw man.
You've got, 5-6 people gutting your posts. You may want to check who's stupid again here.
If laws don't stop criminals then what's the point? Lay out the point of laws then in your opinion.
I'm not advocating doing away with laws, dumbass.
Pathetic incels like you that think Beto calling out these s bags is what is "sickening." You and all your ilk are disgusting abhorrent sickos the love dead children. Pro-life my ass
Yeah but Cruz was about to leap at Beto while he stood still holding his hands
No, you're not really advocating doing anything at all you moron. You're just another idiot that thinks the obvious solution wouldnt work cus pEoPlE wIlL bReAK LaWs AnYwAy. Dumbass
The fact that 5 or 6 people are too stupid to use basic logic is not my problem. I am not advocating doing away with laws.
What law are you proposing?
https://www.spurstalk.com/forums/sho...3#post10743163
I agreed with what Splits outlined earlier in this thread. The same thing pretty much everyone that isnt a gun fellating moron is saying
Also just to point out how idiotic and disingenuous you right wingers are
-he didnt "storm the stage." he didnt even get on the stage
-parents werent screaming at him, it was the idiot on stage
-he wasn't "dragged out" at all
-Ted Cruz didnt do a damn thing
stfu incel
The barbarians pushing for abortion for 9 months don't get to lecture others about caring for human life.
Great way to absolve yourself of being a piece of S***. you have no moral high ground to stand on
the pro-death penalty, pro-gun, pro-mass shootings party pretending to care about the lives of unborn babies
I know, so what do you believe is the purpose of law then?
Second time.
If you read between the lines, CC did agree with one of my proposals: outlaw the military body armor. Guess why? Because it doesn't affect him personally (100-1 he doesn't own an armored vest). Every other thing I suggest would affect him directly, so he lines up the discriminatory law against minorities defense to deflect from the fact it would have an impact on him.
Selfish prick. Can't debate honestly.
There is zero chance that Splits suggestions get implemented and I explained why, and you and Splits wish list is the functional equivalent of "thoughts and prayers".
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)