cope harder, please
cope harder, please
I got McIlroy at +2000 and Homa at +5000.
See. He said be peaceful
You know that's Junior right?
President Trump never asked Pence to “overturn the election.” he asked him to return it to the state legislatures.
Also, where in the relevant law does is say that the Vice President’s role is merely ceremonial, and he doesn’t have the authority to do what Trump was asking him to do?
If you're actually looking for answers there was a Congressional hearing about this yesterday.
Piss-on-them.
In your own words site the law they trump was breaking
*cite
Don't have to use my own words.
All the answers you seek are in the hearings.
You know, the topic of this thread.
Right! Dumpster always demands a black & white answer but never gives one himself. How ironic...
But you don't care what I say....
I'm fine with waiting for the hearings to play out before making such pronouncements, but it doesn't seem like conspiracy charges would be out of realm of possibility.
You idiots don't even think the Pence scheme was illegal.
Dumpster you're as worthless as BlaKKKe and you mean as much to me as that puto does which is zilch. Eat and die bro.
^
Dumpster, you and BlaKKKe are a dynamic couple.
https://www.justsecurity.org/81597/p...-for-optimism/18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) makes it a crime punishable by up to 20 years in prison for anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes an official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” This discussion will assume that the joint session of Congress to count the electoral votes presided over by Vice President Mike Pence on Jan. 6 was an “official proceeding,” and that section 1512(c)(2) applies broadly to efforts to obstruct such a proceeding.
Obstruction of justice:
It is possible that the DOJ could elect to charge Trump with obstruction based solely on his own (and Eastman’s) efforts to pressure Pence to ignore his legal duties. A lead DOJ prosecutor verified the viability of that theory during a pretrial hearing for one of the Jan. 6 defendants. And DC courts have held that inducing another person to violate a legal duty in relation to an official proceeding meets the definition of acting with an unlawful purpose.
One of the worst charlatans ever, tbh
no worries
kamala can obey biden in 2024 and hand over the election to biden or to herself!
im cool with that- are you?
I suspect the committee has a lot more information and they're still investigating so current data if given to doj might put doj on the wrong path
They're investigating how to manipulate the American people. Your beloved DOJ is on the take.
With what doj has learned from the public presentations they certainly can outline what they want to do
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)