Keldon&9 for 4? Interesting but i dont know enough about who they want if its worth it
https://www.spurstalk.com/spurs-trad...022-nba-draft/
Lightly protected 2028 first round picks would be underwhelming tomorrow but could pay big dividends down the road.
Keldon&9 for 4? Interesting but i dont know enough about who they want if its worth it
Excellent work!
Yo ST, can we talk about this:
Does ST say yes to this deal?4) One source told me that the Oklahoma City Thunder gauged San Antonio’s interest on a deal that consisted of Keldon Johnson, Devin Vassell, the ninth pick and a future first rounder from the Spurs for the second overall pick. That call, he says, was short-lived.
i mean spurs clearly weren't interested
Thanks for the exclusive. I am not trading Keldon and the 9 for SAC 4. But I would consider the OKC 2 for Keldon, Vassell, 9 and future pick to get Chet. That I’m willing to take. I think I can still jettison 20 and 25 with Poeltl to get to Duren.
I lose Vassell/Keldon but gained Chet/Duren? yeah!
Murray, Primo, McD, Chet, Duren
Jones, Lonnie, J-Rich, Zollins, Londale
Not my question, tbh
Spurs might have a hard time moving poodle at that price
obviously,tbh
Spurs asking for a king’s ransom for Jak
I ninja-edited another aspect of that deal: the future first they wanted would have been unprotected.
dont think you're getting duren in that scenario
which is why sa said no,obviously
Eh...
I do think Keldon's the one you trade if you're getting an offensive player, but I also think this trade is rumor that's been around for weeks and not really something being talked about. I'm not sold on Murray not being better than Johnson. He's a better fit.
If you like Banchero or Chet, you obviously make that trade. Murray and enough cap space to max another player checks a lot of boxes. Vassell and Johnson are nice, but they aren't going to stand in the way of a franchise player.
Two firsts seem like a lot for Poeltl. Unless they are trying to tell teams to back off, I do think they'll end up coming down. Two firsts for 20 makes sense if they "fake firsts" like OKC got for 16 last year. I 100-percent don't see them dumping the pick for a single selection in a future year. You can't love the depth of the draft but not like someone at 20. That's absurd. 25 is a different story.
I've been pretty vocal about my belief that SA can and probably should go into next season with four rookies and that it's not remotely uncommon for the team to do so. I think if clubs are just hoping that happens, then they're in for a rude awakening. The Spurs shouldn't make a trade to avoid making a pick. That's bad juju, as Boston has found out. There's nothing wrong with trading from strength, but they'll have ample opportunity to acquire future firsts over the years. They don't need to worry about "wasting" a couple right now.
Anything for Chet. yeah.
Love that idea of packaging 25 and 38 for a future FRP especially for a 23 FRP. If Spurs get 2 really interesting players with 9 and 20 I say punt the rest if given the opportunity and focus on the 2.
The real dirty is that none of the top picks are franchise players. None of them.
God Bless, Spurs are totally over playing their hand lmao were gonna have 4 rookies after all
Theyd hve to be for spurs to make that deal. Okc looking to fleece somebody
Sounds like the Spurs are gonna draft Dieng. Thanks I hate it.
obviously not a fan
We haven't seen neither Keldon's nor Vassell's ceiling yet. Can't make that deal in my opinion. We have four picks. Make good picks and our depth and warchest of trade assets could be nasty good. tbh
Depends on the board. I’m drafting Jovic if he’s still there and stash Procida.
I will trade J-Rich and others for future picks to create space. Guys are not contending next year. Better to cash in and roll the dice on drafting, and could turn into gold.
Now you're just trolling lol
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)