I think he sucks, just to clarify, and see no reason for him to be on the team since he will be given minutes that someone else needs.
Yeah, I’m aware of your view and concur, wholeheartedly! I sometimes enjoy beating a dead horse when I yell McDermott is a negative asset. He’ll be on the final roster only because it will cost to move him and 25 mins a night if McD is good for the downside (which is actually the upside).
Westbrick would be a great addition just for the lawls.
Nah she should stay in L.A
Russ+Pat Bev will be entertaining AF
Beverly tearing Westbrook's ACL again (in practice) would be perfect for the Lakers. Then they could dump him without having to tacitly admit that he's a net negative on the court.
Maybe that's actually Pelinka's plan
They already have the ideal C setup with Davis' insistence on starting as the nominal PF, which is a fringe starter (Bryant) who can stretch the floor and a fringe rotation player (Jones) who can provide vertical spacing.
They're good enough to be "inning eaters" during the regular season, but not good/big enough names for the team to concern themselves with how they'll react when they have their roles reduced in certain matchups and if/when they get to the play-in/offs.
Westbrook probably ends up traded to the Pacers or Jazz before the season starts, gets bought out and is without a team to start the season.
After tonights game we need to get him ASAP!!!
Why, what happened in the game?
He was 0-11 and only had 2 points...
I'd offer Jak, McD, Rich for WB and 2 firsts and a swap and leave it on the table...LA will come around to that if they can't find something better especially as Bron keeps complaining...
nah let it marinate
100%
A Poeltl trade by itself to a different team, even for 2 firsts, probably won't be unprotected. And 2 firsts is a big stretch. Just put him in LA. Davis is sick of playing center.
Probably should ask to take Damion Jones back, need another body for minutes at center
Oh man...that would be an awesome do entary. And possibly even a funny sitcom.
Turner And Hield better deal
Agree with this framework.
My sense is Poeltl is worth a lottery protected 1st and a flyer on a fading prospect.
Lakers don't make sense since even in a Davis primarily masquerading as a PF scenario, the C has to be able to space the floor.
The best the Lakers can probably do, is something like Westbrook and Nunn for Rozier III and Hayward.
Both sides probably argue they deserve a pick: Hornets for giving them value, namely in Rozier III; Lakers for taking on a lot of long-term money, some of which is for an injury prone, fading player in Hayward.
Lakers can get turner and Hield. Spurs would need to lower it to 1 pick to have a shot.
Lakers may soon join the tank fiesta tbh.. They're one Lebron big injury away...
Hield is fading fast. His last 3 seasons 3G%: .366 .368 .362. That’s sounds OK, but with Buddy, if he’s not around 40-42%, he’s a net negative, because he literally does nothing else. He made his bones with seasons of 42,43,42%, and Sacto was smart to dump him before he completely cratered. He creeping up on 30.
Turner is more or less a traditional big who can stretch some, but not really switch on D.
If they can do then they should get it done before Indiana has second thoughts.
LMAO if that happens since the Pelicans have the right to swap picks
Poeltl ain't worth no 1st c'mon man
Stop....even when tanking I don't want Westbrick anywhere near this team. Not because of his play but I would hate for his toxicity to wear down on our young guys.
He'd obviously be bought out
You can resist all you want but someone is taking both them firsts from you guys if you have any attention whatsoever of upgrading your roster while Lebron's abilities are still in his championship windowPoeltl ain't worth no 1st c'mon man
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote