Reply With Quote
Fixed it for you.
Yep. like when harry Reid went nuclear to get judges appointed. That came back to bite y'all in the ass big time.
Precedents eventually swing both ways as power shifts.
now you resort to spreading propaganda
no one fooled the fbi about anything
the dossier was 1% of the 100% evidence they had and they treated it as such
the russian trolls brainwashed the entire right wing and idiots like you into giving credence to garbage like what you just posted
be better
Fixed it for you.
Yep. like when harry Reid went nuclear to get judges appointed. That came back to bite y'all in the ass big time.
Precedents eventually swing both ways as power shifts.
"russian trolls"
be better
So presidents are above the law but they should hang him?
C'mon Base. I'm no fan of Trump and I'm not defending him.
I was specifically referring to the Precedent of raiding an Ex-Presidents house.
But the precedent of hanging an ex-president is ok? Especially when they can't raid his house to get evidence of his crimes?
Yes, you are a ing hypocrite.
Your example is a failure.
Dude stonewalled and hid this for 2.5 years and you want to coddle him some more.
That's bull .
An ex President that tried to overthrow the cons utional transfer of power on Jan 6? Yeah I hope they throw the book at him for that one. They don't need to raid his house to prove that one.
What are you ASSuming he hid?
If the FBI has a search warrant it means they have probable cause. Especially if they're in with former politicians. I don't give a if they raid Biden or Obama or whoever the if they have probable cause and a warrant. No politicians should be above the law
What do you think they're raiding his house for here? Why are you being lazy and stupid here?
Presidential records at the very least.
That's already been proved this past January.
Classified or even highly classified do ents at worst. That's assumed given the actual procedure that had to be followed to get to this point and of which you seem to be blissfully ignorant.
Blske, just shut the up and let the adults have a discussion.
But don't raid his house if they're worried about him selling or giving access to classified do ents he stole because he was once president? Doesn't make much sense.
Rofl you've been dying to use that so badly here that you didn't care that nobody is contradicting themselves here.
Except you
You are making a pretty big leap of (totally undo ented) faith on this "selling classified info".
that certainly isn't why DOJ says they raided the house.
Why did they raid his "house"?
The adults are ting on you yet again, slappy.
He had a Chinese spy found out at his home. I don't think it's much of a leap to worry about him selling or giving access to classified information he stole. Even unknowingly giving access. It's still his fault for stealing classified do ents if they get found by said spy.
They specifically said it was about returning records to the Presidential archives. You don't read?
Who is "they"?
Is there some new statement from DOJ?
We are simply having a discussion. The only one that got on is you by Sancho.
Are you seriously that uninformed?
NARA and DOJ
the right-wing heel turn on law enforcement has been a sight to see. ya'll sound like the woke libs y'all hate so much.
Is there an actual statement from them today?
I'll admit I haven't followed the news for six hours.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
