Page 47 of 90 FirstFirst ... 3743444546474849505157 ... LastLast
Results 1,151 to 1,175 of 2228
  1. #1151
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,834
    What if the Spurs PASS on Scoot altogether? Should be (provided he's available when the Spurs pick) if Scoot is drafted and kept, or else.
    Dejounte?

  2. #1152
    Veteran heyheymymy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    8,453
    Reminds me of all the thoughts about Dyson Daniels and Shadeon Sharpe when it came down to it both were gone by #9 and the question was moot.

  3. #1153
    Veteran heyheymymy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    8,453
    Really warming up on a Thompson, prefer Ausar actually. Been thinking about this but you can teach shooting. Especially in a positive development environment like SA. You can't teach freak athleticism, that 6'7 frame. Ausar is a lump of clay and Spurs dev is the sculptor.

    Look at Sochan, NOT known as an offensively diverse guy coming into the league and people said it would take work. But like 55 games in he is showcasing layers of offensive tools. The talent and the athleticism are the lump of clay and that's what players use to their advantage once they learn the offensive skillsets to abuse their advantage in athleticism. Hats off to Jeremy to learn and do the work, but that's the dev culture of San Antonio at work too, imo.

    I see someone like say Nick Smith Jr as really just one dimensional scoring and some playmaking but a sieve on defense and just empty calories scoring. Which might be golden for another team with more meat on the bones roster-wise where NSJ could just come in as scoring punch and put the team over the top. Spurs need more than that right now and NSJ could seem like just a drop in the bucket in SA. But Ausar could be essentially at least in the same ballpark playmaking-wise as NSJ, with at least plausibly more respectable defense, especially perimeter, plus better glue stuff like steals, blocks, and rebounds than NSJ, plus Ausar has the athleticism to eventually become a better scorer with time once he learns, in the positive development environment of a club like SA, with tons of mins to throw at him.

    How much of the inability to shoot, the poor finishing at the rim, how much of that is really just that ty league the Thomsons twins are in? The ty league, the ty compe ion, the ty coaches, staff and system? You can't improve in that. NCAA is better pressure and better coaching, gets kids into better positions to hone their craft and learn from more various adversities they face. But take a raw but gifted frame and freakish athleticism like Ausar and put it in the proper moulding cir stances, can you press out a diamond? Would be interesting too as Keldon possibly taps out in value, pick up Ausar who can shift up SG/SF, sell high on Keldon Johnson with mostly more late late draft capital, say 26 or 27 and on, and reload the wing. Was watching an interview with the twins and the personality read came back very clean and encouraging. They seem over themselves and ready to be carved into excellence imo.

  4. #1154
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    18,255
    What if the Spurs PASS on Scoot altogether? Should be (provided he's available when the Spurs pick) if Scoot is drafted and kept, or else.
    Not to interject inappropriately, but it would appear the terms of the trade would be:

    If the Spurs pick #2 or lower AND Scoot is on the board, Dejounte wins if Scoot is picked by the Spurs and starts the season with him. All other scenarios (Spurs draft someone else, or they draft and trade him, or they trade out of the pick), then Ex wins.

  5. #1155
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    18,255
    My early lottery mock based on a tankathon sim run:

    1. Detroit Pistons - Victor Wembanyama

    2. Houston Rockets - Scoot Henderson

    3. Chicago Bulls - Amen Thompson

    4. Charlotte Hornets - Brandon Miller

    5. San Antonio Spurs - Ausar Thompson

    6. Orlando Magic - Nick Smith Jr.

    7. Indiana Pacers - Jarace Walker

    8. Portland Trailblazers - Keyonte George

    9. Washington Wizards - Cam Whitmore

    10. OKC Thunder- Gradey

    11. Toronto Raptors - Anthony Black

    12. NOLA Pelicans - Brice Sensabough

    13. Utah Jazz - Cason Wallace

    14. LA Lakers - Dariq Whitehead
    This is a nightmare scenario, IMO, but at least Ausar is a home run swing after the tank fails to yield glory.

    I still like Cam Whitmore at 5, but that's probably a reach.

  6. #1156
    OH YOU LIKE IT!!! slick'81's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Post Count
    18,469
    We got a$100 wager boys

  7. #1157
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    28,160
    Reminds me of all the thoughts about Dyson Daniels and Shadeon Sharpe when it came down to it both were gone by #9 and the question was moot.
    Yeah, both teams should have taken Sochan instead.

  8. #1158
    Believe. Vince Carter's ankle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    Post Count
    528
    I still like Cam Whitmore at 5, but that's probably a reach.
    Do you really like Miles Bridges that much?

  9. #1159
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,208
    Yeah, both teams should have taken Sochan instead.
    It's way to early to draw that conclusion....

  10. #1160
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,834
    It's way to early to draw that conclusion....
    I think you can safely say it about Portland. Sharpe is nauseatingly bad, like bottom few on RAPTOR in the league.

  11. #1161
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    28,160
    It's way to early to draw that conclusion....
    Probably not. I like Daniels and we'll see. Sharpe, definitely. Either way, Pels and Blazers would be far better right now had they picked Sochan. He'd add something both teams are sorely lacking.

  12. #1162
    Veteran mo7888's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Post Count
    6,208
    Probably not. I like Daniels and we'll see. Sharpe, definitely. Either way, Pels and Blazers would be far better right now had they picked Sochan. He'd add something both teams are sorely lacking.
    I'm not disputing that Sochan is better or that those teams would be better now, but the draft isn't about year one, and we don't have enough data to draw those conclusions yet. We really don't know if any of the 3 turn into anything special over the course of their careers. While I also agree with you and ex that Sharpe isn't likely to be a plus player (putting it mildly) over time, it only matters in the context of this proposition if Sochan does well. So, like you guys, I'd bet on Sochan at this point as being the better choice, I just can't conclude it yet..

  13. #1163
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    3,928
    Do you really like Miles Bridges that much?
    As a player Miles Bridges sounds like a good ceiling for anyone in this draft outside the top 3 (Wemby, Scoot & Miller).
    If we pick outside of top 3, I think Cam Whitmore and Anthony Black are probably our best bets as high floor (productive NBA player) and relatively high ceiling (high end starter, occasional all star) type players.
    As for the rest, the Thomson twins range from superstars (low probability) to busts (more likely). Keyonte George is an undersized chucker, Nic Smith isn't a PG and seems injury prone (history + body type), and every time I watch Jarace Walker I come away unimpressed.
    Wemby is the only player I'd keep no matter what, Miller is on that level on talent but his cir stances make him an extremely unlikely keeper by PATFO, and Scoot's progress has been underwhelming this year so I'd be willing to move him for the right offer.
    Other than that, I'd rather trade down (say for Orlando's 2 picks, NOLA's pick + Dyson Daniels, a lower lottery pick + future unrestricted pick or promising youngster, etc) or even out. I'm not enamored with this class at all.

  14. #1164
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    3,928
    It's way to early to draw that conclusion....
    It's still way too early, but if I'm given the choice today, I'd take Sochan over either of them 100 times out of 100.

  15. #1165
    El rojo y los Spurs!!! Ariel's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Post Count
    3,928
    Reminds me of all the thoughts about Dyson Daniels and Shadeon Sharpe when it came down to it both were gone by #9 and the question was moot.
    It was pretty evident at the time that only one of Mathurin, Daniels and Sochan would be available at 9. Also Sharpe was likely (though not surely) gone. No major surprises.

  16. #1166
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    28,160
    I'm not disputing that Sochan is better or that those teams would be better now, but the draft isn't about year one, and we don't have enough data to draw those conclusions yet. We really don't know if any of the 3 turn into anything special over the course of their careers. While I also agree with you and ex that Sharpe isn't likely to be a plus player (putting it mildly) over time, it only matters in the context of this proposition if Sochan does well. So, like you guys, I'd bet on Sochan at this point as being the better choice, I just can't conclude it yet..
    Oh, definitely. Four years, things could be very different. Sochan could plateau. Sharpe could turn it around, and I feel he will to some degree. Dyson Daniels has G-League disease right now but can definitely develop.

  17. #1167
    Veteran K...'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    8,189
    What would you say about trading out and trying the compete next season? We would still have additional picks coming and can get more picks by trading our talents if we want to return to bottom barrel tanking

  18. #1168
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,834
    What would you say about trading out and trying the compete next season? We would still have additional picks coming and can get more picks by trading our talents if we want to return to bottom barrel tanking
    Next draft looks meh. I would trade down a bit this year, but not out. I mean, by this time last year, Wemby was already a buzz, and there is no one for 2024 generating any at all, other than the Bronny hype machine, and he won't go lottery unless someone has a stroke. The next buzz player I see is Cam Boozer in 2026, absolutely crushing the same compe ion that the 20 YO Thompsons are just drifting through, at FIFTEEN, and we have an unprotected swap from the DJ trade, plus other possible picks depending on what conveys and when between now and then.

  19. #1169
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    28,160
    Next draft looks meh. I would trade down a bit this year, but not out. I mean, by this time last year, Wemby was already a buzz, and there is no one for 2024 generating any at all, other than the Bronny hype machine, and he won't go lottery unless someone has a stroke. The next buzz player I see is Cam Boozer in 2026, absolutely crushing the same compe ion that the 20 YO Thompsons are just drifting through, at FIFTEEN, and we have an unprotected swap from the DJ trade, plus other possible picks depending on what conveys and when between now and then.
    Is next draft as ty as this one?

  20. #1170
    Forum Official Personal Life Coach BacktoBasics's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    11,226
    Anyone feel Emoni Bates has played himself back into the late 1st or early 2nd?

  21. #1171
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,834
    Anyone feel Emoni Bates has played himself back into the late 1st or early 2nd?
    Possibly, but he sucks. He's heliocentric, inefficient, and a terrible defender. Counting stats, especially raw ppg, define very little. The worst mistake you can make in player eval is holding onto HS rankings.

  22. #1172
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,834
    Nick Smith is gonna be a good player imo.
    He's not a good college player, so I'm not sure where you're drawing this conclusion.

  23. #1173
    Veteran K...'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    8,189
    Isnt? Everyone on earth heliocentric whether you believe it or not? Is this a funny way of saying ball dominant chucker? Or is the true center of the universe actually the primordial void that the universe bubbled uup from and will pop back into?

  24. #1174
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    43,834
    Isnt? Everyone on earth heliocentric whether you believe it or not? Is this a funny way of saying ball dominant chucker? Or is the true center of the universe actually the primordial void that the universe bubbled uup from and will pop back into?
    Ball dominant, and virtually a non factor without it in their hands. Also known as high friction. Should not be paired with another heliocentric. You MUST build around such a player, and if they don't pop as a superstar, you're team is ed.

  25. #1175
    Veteran BG_Spurs_Fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    5,588
    He's not a good college player, so I'm not sure where you're drawing this conclusion.
    I like Nick Smith too, despite of his poor year from a statistical standpoint.

    He hasn't been fully healthy all year long, never got into a rhythm but despite all that he has shown a mature and modern type of game - great movement without the ball, good handles, a good floater, great looking shot - everything you need in a modern combo guard. This is why I'm willing to burn the tape from his poor games and believe in his upside. Drafting him anywhere past the first two picks is fine by me. I see him as a Maxey type with the additional upside of being the primary ballhandler, not just a typical combo.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •