Not only that but the 3 pt line is the same as it is in the NBA.
here’s something I read recently:
”I think people are also forgetting that Scoot is shooting 32% from the NBA 3P line, while all these college and international prospects are shooting from 2 feet closer. If you don't think it makes a big difference - go look at the difference in 3P% for all these "can he shoot?" Prospects between college and NBA. Cade shot 40% from 3 in college and was at 31% his rookie year. Suggs shot 33.5% in college, and 21% in the NBA.
It matters less for the elite 3P shooters, but it makes a big difference for guys on the fringe.”
a lot of guys on here are letting stats tell the whole story. Basketball is much more than stats.
ex, I will be looking at the terms of the deal soon.
not sure why folks here have convinced themselves so hard to downplay a prospect because they don’t approve of their path to the NBA.
in some cases, guys aren’t even being truthful about his performance. Somehow he’s “doing poor” statistically but he compares very well to past all star point guards before they were drafted.
a lot of guys are overthinking this. In fact, the same dude that was down on Giddey has the same exact reasons for being down on Scoot. Letting stats or size tell the story (they said Giddey has T Rex arms) and convinced themselves so hard that he would be no good.
don’t know why guys have to be so stubborn… and loud. Scoot’s feel for the game is next level but let’s settle for more mediocre looking guys like Black because the stats look somewhat efficient. Makes no sense.
and I’m fine with drafting Black if Scoot wasn’t available… but if he was? What a joke to even think about.