Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 97 of 97
  1. #76
    Enemy of the System Millennial_Messiah's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    24,616
    Didn't look like that play was ejection worthy, tbh.

    But getting Herbert outta there and check out was def the right call.
    yeah, Greenlaw led with the shoulder and not the head, the helmet to helmet was incidental contact and plus Herbert was a runner not a roughing the passer situation, so awful call.

    Just another example of the jewish led NFL (@mark celibate can testify) being hypocrites in front of your very nose; on one side they paint "End Racism" by the goal post at every stadium, but on the same side of the coin they penalize and eject predominately-Black defensive players at disproportionate rates, to support their largely white elite quarterback consortium.

    How anyone with a brain can't see this is lunacy, but it's also why the midterms did what they did... the USA is a largely bluepilled population that needs a nice big kick in the ass, by civil war or by nuke or by severe depression and a more competent nation like Russia taking our place for world dominance for at least some years.

  2. #77
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    38,471
    Gould never misses PATs. What a weird game.

  3. #78
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    38,471
    trying to even argue that's a touchback

  4. #79
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    17,632
    Das ist

    Classic 49ers game

  5. #80
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    38,471
    Niners could legitimately run the table tbh. They won't due due to Crappolo but their toughest opponents left they play at home.

    Imo,

    @Cards (Mexico): W
    Saints: W
    Dolphins: Prolly L
    Bucs: W (unless Brady isn't done)
    @Seacucks: W (classic Niners lose here)
    Commanders: W
    At Raiders (shoutout to Raid): W
    Cards: W
    Last edited by Robz4000; 11-14-2022 at 02:19 AM.

  6. #81
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    17,632
    Niners could legitimately run the table tbh. They won't due due to Crappolo but their toughest opponents left they play at home.

    Imo,

    @Cards (Mexico): W
    Saints: W
    Dolphins: Prolly L
    Bucs: W (unless Brady isn't done)
    @Seacucks: W (classic Niners lose here)
    Commanders: W
    Raiders: W
    Cards: W
    Hey now

    I like we but

    split the Bucs/Hawks 2 games in 5 days

    Cards twice and team we've struggled with probably drop 1

    3-0 in division. Just need to keep our edge. League wise I'm not scared we are Road Warriors with Jimmy.

  7. #82
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    17,632
    Juszczyk
    Elijah
    CMC
    Deebo
    Kittle
    Ayiuk


    Dream Team

  8. #83
    faggy opinion + certainty Mark Celibate's Avatar
    My Team
    San Diego Chargers
    Post Count
    4,378
    As much sh!t as I’ve given Cuckott that one was on the defense and McBot tbh

  9. #84
    Vikings-Bills catch controversy: NFL admits Gabe Davis' fourth-quarter grab would have been ruled incomplete
    NFL Week 10 grades: Tom Brady's Buccaneers earn an 'A-' for win in Germany; Raiders get an 'F' for ugly loss (cbssports.com)


  10. #85
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    21,158
    Vikings-Bills catch controversy: NFL admits Gabe Davis' fourth-quarter grab would have been ruled incomplete
    NFL Week 10 grades: Tom Brady's Buccaneers earn an 'A-' for win in Germany; Raiders get an 'F' for ugly loss (cbssports.com)

    I'm shocked they didn't review it. Even live from the normal camera angle, I was pretty unsure if he caught it. Doesn't matter I guess, Bills lost anyway.

  11. #86
    I cannot grok its fullnes leemajors's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    24,166
    As much sh!t as I’ve given Cuckott that one was on the defense and McBot tbh
    Still no reason to throw 46 times when your rbs are averaging over 5ypc

    Edit - and up 14 to start the 4th

  12. #87
    I'm shocked they didn't review it. Even live from the normal camera angle, I was pretty unsure if he caught it. Doesn't matter I guess, Bills lost anyway.
    Are the Bills the new Bradys as far as pampering and ref riggin?

    Now a true BradyRef would have sealed the deal and called the Vikings fumble recovery of Fingers Allen to be Bills ball thus end of game....

    But still, BillsRef has come up with some doozeys this year.

    Did you also notice how many times Bills dbs were able to do the full on pull on jersey and keep holding on for 5-6 seconds? Couple times the jersey came untucked and you could clearly see Bills defender coatailing. No calls.

    Rewarded for the new stadium scam?

  13. #88
    faggy opinion + certainty Mark Celibate's Avatar
    My Team
    San Diego Chargers
    Post Count
    4,378
    Still no reason to throw 46 times when your rbs are averaging over 5ypc

    Edit - and up 14 to start the 4th
    rofl yeah I’m not sure what this organization’s fetish is with abandoning the run when they have big leads against the Packers. They did the same thing in 2013 blowing that huge lead when The Bot went full Air Raid mode after Murray ran all
    over them the 1st half

  14. #89
    I'm shocked they didn't review it. Even live from the normal camera angle, I was pretty unsure if he caught it. Doesn't matter I guess, Bills lost anyway.
    Here's yet another one.
    Maybe we can get DeadlyDynasty to explain:

    Bills had 12 men on field for crucial OT play vs. Vikings (espn.com)

  15. #90
    coffee's for closers FrostKing's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    17,632
    Vikings-Bills catch controversy: NFL admits Gabe Davis' fourth-quarter grab would have been ruled incomplete
    NFL Week 10 grades: Tom Brady's Buccaneers earn an 'A-' for win in Germany; Raiders get an 'F' for ugly loss (cbssports.com)

    You're very Pro Vikings brother. I noticed during the game. What's the story?

  16. #91
    You're very Pro Vikings brother. I noticed during the game. What's the story?
    I'm always all about fairness.
    Been noticing the Bills getting pref treatment for a while now.

    Real generally speaking, the owners club likes to reward owners who really scam their local residents for a new funded stadium. Beyond that are they looking ahead to a replacement for Tampon Tom and have fallen on Josh Allen?

  17. #92
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    21,158
    10832116[/URL]]Here's yet another one.
    Maybe we can get DeadlyDynasty to explain:

    Bills had 12 men on field for crucial OT play vs. Vikings (espn.com)
    Why are you so ing weird. You never seem to want to have a normal discussion. It’s odd as .

  18. #93
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    Kansas City Chiefs
    Post Count
    44,886
    Can they review facemasks? If not, why?

  19. #94
    ಥ﹏ಥ DAF86's Avatar
    My Team
    Kansas City Chiefs
    Post Count
    44,886
    C'mon, that can't be roughing the passer.

  20. #95
    Why are you so ing weird. You never seem to want to have a normal discussion. It’s odd as .
    Bills had 12 men on the field for the crucial stop on 4th and goal for the Vikings. It undoubtedly helped seal the line because you know, 12 is more then 11.

    What the are you asking?

  21. #96
    The Golden Goddess TheCultOfPersonality's Avatar
    My Team
    Green Bay Packers
    Post Count
    6,442
    So the most shocking that happened in Week 10 was the Packers scoring 31 points in a game. I don't think anyone saw that one coming.

  22. #97
    C'mon, that can't be roughing the passer.
    Eagles had a legit shot to perform a game winning drive too.

    NFL corruption is sickening.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •