I give a link the source anytime I post something here. You are free to go through my posting history if you are so curious about what sources I read and link here.
Seriously...what are you talking about?
Ok. Still don't understand why he keeps calling it famous, unless he is referring to the 24/7 media coverage using that letter to declare the Hunter laptop a Russian disinformation campaign and dismiss it's contents.
The letter wasn't brought up by him, it was brought up by Darrin.
exactly. all you want to talk about is the media, and not the contents of the letter itself. even though darrin specifically referred to BOTH the media and the experts (referring to the letter). but now he refuses to discuss what those experts actually said
Last edited by spurraider21; 12-01-2022 at 02:43 PM.
In your own words, what is on Hunter's laptop that you think would've achieved your wet dream of a second Trump term, Darrin?
The letter was published for the media to use to dismiss the story as the story as Russian disinformation. And@ "experts".
but what did the letter actually say? that they had confirmed it to be russian disinfo?The letter was published for the media to use to dismiss the story as the story as Russian disinformation. And
There is only one paragraph where they say they don't know if the emails are genuine, the rest of it they STRONGLY insinuated it was Russian disinformation. At the end they flat out say it..."Our view that the Russians are involved in the Hunter Biden email issue"
They didn't need to confirm it was Russian disinformation for the media to make the claim it was all Russian disinformation. That was the entire point of the letter...to let the media make the claim it was Russian disinformation, call it fake news, and bury the story to try and protect Biden. You can't see the forest for the trees.
Can we just get back to laughing at Reck? That was much more entertaining.
It's much more fun laughing at you and Darrin when you're still whining about muh laptop.
What would've hurt Biden?
It all got out before the election.
first 3 paragraphs make no claims at all
4th paragraph makes no claims other than this having the "earmarks" of russian disinfo
5th unequivocally states ("we want to emphasize that") they do not know if the laptop contents are genuine or not, and "that we do not have evidence of russian involvement - just that our experience makes us deeply su ious that the russian government played a siginificant role"
then they go into the handful of factors that makes them think its a russian op. pretty big disclaimer before they get into any of it. if you could direct me to an msm source that hoisted the letter, and says "this proves it is russian disinfo and therefore we can disregard this story" i'd love to see it
nobody ever whines about crossfire hurricane being kept completely under wraps and not made public until after the election
tbh it’s one of the biggest premature ejac threads in this history of this forum, only trailing all my 19-0 Patriots proclamations. Proclaiming victory for an octogenarian invalid, and demanding apologies 2 years before an election is wild. At least my irrational confidence came from playing against Eli Manning.Can we just get back to laughing at Reck? That was much more entertaining.
Politico headline
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
The letter from the "experts" was written specifically to be used by the media to discredit the story, protect Biden, and sway voters. End of story.
Not only does he prematurely ejac he also does a victory lap and s on himself with his own quote saying they'll take the house
I mean TSA was posting links to Chinese sites with videos claimed to be Hunterporn before the election.
Whom did you want to sway with that, TSA?
rightPolitico headline
Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say
The letter from the "experts" was written specifically to be used by the media to discredit the story, protect Biden, and sway voters. End of story.
"dozens of former intel officials say"
and go read the actual article
again. reading the actual letter, reading the actual article, and not twitter headlines purporting to tell you what is actually in them, is usually a good step.
Are you seriously claiming the MSM didn't use the letter to discredit, disregard, and bury the story to protect Biden before the election?right
"dozens of former intel officials say"
and go read the actual article
again. reading the actual letter, reading the actual article, and not twitter headlines purporting to tell you what is actually in them, is usually a good step.
It's not as easy to find written articles anymore because they all retracted or revised the headlines and articles
Is honesty important to you, TSA?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
