Reply With Quote
looks like both feet down, control and 1 step taken
honestly the nfl. if that's not a catch then what is?
looks like both feet down, control and 1 step taken
Both feet down, control but 3rd step clearly NOT taken.
got BradyRef would have made that auto INT were it Pattycakes or Bucs.
As a Cowboys fan, who are you rooting for here?
Nah. Still can realize he's the much more talented player, tbh.You did until about 30 minutes ago
No sound where you are at.
Gene Tracatorre clearly explained rule.
That’s a weird call imho
Chiefs getting robbed there. Brady would never.
Another incompletion given to the Eagles.
Should be incomplete
My god eagles getting some egregious calls this drive
How much money do the refs have on the Eagles? Watch them mantian the call.
Yeah no, the miles sanders play was a clear catch fumble. It’s not like he got blown up in the instant he caught the ball or his feet hit the floor. He hopped a little and then got nailed in midair. The hop is your football move
NFL really thinks no one is gonna notice them changing the definition of a completion multiple times on the same drive
Told you.
You don’t need a third step. You need a “football move” when is subjective but basically any independent movement from the catch himself. Sanders left his feet following possession and that should have been sufficient
eaglerefs
Goedert play was a lot closer. Sanders catch fumble was plain as day
I really didn’t care but I’ve got a teaser on the Chiefs and the under.
Ah ok, gotcha.
10 pts swing thanks to the refs.
I think I’m f’d. My under was 57.5.
Binky commercial
Crown Royal commercial
Canada trying to hijack our Super Bowl!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
