Reply With Quote
Not supporting your own claims in a public forum is either you being lazy, or covering up PFA bs.
If you want to be a lazy bull ter, that's fine.
And if you want to get huffy about other posters pointing it out, like you just did, that's fine too.
He got that tact from that other asshole (Dumps).
Not supporting your own claims in a public forum is either you being lazy, or covering up PFA bs.
If you want to be a lazy bull ter, that's fine.
And if you want to get huffy about other posters pointing it out, like you just did, that's fine too.
Again, you are a lazy . If you want more information on a subject that's on you. Your "rules" that we are supposed to look up for you just because you "demand" it are total bull you lazy, drunk .Not supporting your own claims in a public forum is either you being lazy, or covering up PFA bs.
If you want to be a lazy bull ter, that's fine.
And if you want to get huffy about other posters pointing it out, like you just did, that's fine too.
CC is ashamed of his sources. This has been proved several times.
Using the Ignore Feature is just as bad if not worse, Winestein.Not supporting your own claims in a public forum is either you being lazy, or covering up PFA bs.
If you want to be a lazy bull ter, that's fine.
And if you want to get huffy about other posters pointing it out, like you just did, that's fine too.
You've nary room, son. Nary.
GD rights, CC.
Almost every time
You GD ass-smootchin' SOB, you.
Hour Ago
Thread
notthewordsofonewhokneels
This message is hidden because Thread is on your ignore list.
View Post
Remove user from ignore list
Aww. I bet it was another gem. Sorry I missed.
Says another lazy . "My rules are you should look up stuff I want more information on"
Lazy s
And this one is just a stupid echo of chump.
Well yeah because they like doing the same thing by instead just leading with you having to answer some loaded question they think will 'win' them the argument.
If you made an assertion and do not want to back it up then don't but do not expect anyone to be compelled.
I usually post the source so asking for it isn't necessary.
It's pretty easy tbh.
Few here are interested in credibility, so I understand the reluctance.
Though like I assured you a thousand times:::I ignore no one. Ever. It's my religion.
& you're the flag bearer, son.
Tell it, CC.
Testify!!!
Oh, no!!! Lumps & Dumps headin' for the tree. O-M-G!!!
Lol still whining. You're such a huge pussy.
Please! That's all you've done is whine since I came on board more than a decade ago.
Remember CCs cow intestines source? Good times.
& don't forget your diego outing you, Effy...as a MAGAt.
why you guys attack me every time
Gee..ankle bite again of the beta cuck. What a surprise. Rent free.
Gee..ankle bite again of the beta cuck. What a surprise. Rent free.
Here's your usual method of posting:
1. Make sketchy claim
2. Someone asks for the source
3. You get whiny and defensive like a female chihuahua
4. We all laugh at you.
What a surprise. Beta Cuck lashing out again and hopes a forum alpha will come bail him out. How's Alpha Sancho and the ex? Still laughing at you?
Here's your usual method of posting:
1. Make sketchy claim
2. Someone asks for the source
3. You get whiny and defensive like a female chihuahua
4. We all laugh at you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions