Reply With Quote
"MSM calls for regime change in Moscow"
"The same MSM cries when Kremlin does not want them to interview Putin"
Today's re s
https://meduza.io/en/news/2024/02/07...lo-saxon-mediaKremlin says Putin agreed to interview with Tucker Carlson because he differs from ‘traditional Anglo-Saxon media’
...
Peskov was also asked to comment on Carlson’s claim that “not a single Western journalist has bothered” to interview Putin since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The press secretary said that, on the contrary, the Kremlin has received numerous interview requests, but that they were all from Western media outlets “that take a one-sided stance”:
Mr. Carlson is not correct. In fact, there’s no way he could know this. We receive numerous requests for interviews with the president, but mostly, as far as countries in the collective West are concerned, these are from major network media: traditional TV channels and large newspapers that don’t even attempt to appear impartial in their coverage. Of course there’s no desire to communicate with this kind of media.
...
"MSM calls for regime change in Moscow"
"The same MSM cries when Kremlin does not want them to interview Putin"
Today's re s
Mark the date and time niglets
This is going to be epic
Imagine being as excited as hater is about this. What a sad and uneventful life you must lead.
the tears here are awesome
What an idiot lol
"You making fun of me means you're the one who's mad" is a basic 1st grade retort, do you really expect that to land with adults?
How many ass kickings did you take as a kid?
No tears.
But i will think of you when i take a .
Welp….
thanks for the warning cucker!
https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/g...porting-facts/
According to Judge Vyskocil, “Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism about the statements he makes." She doesn't stop there, writing that “[w]hether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as exaggeration, non-literal commentary, or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same—the statements are not actionable."
How sad is your life?
Findlaw.com tells me Tucker is a meanie
No, the legal settlement found that Tucker cost his company $800 million.
No, the legal settlement found that Tucker cost his company $800 million.
lol
and cuckers DEFENSE was basically:
”only re ed people think i am stating facts”
in a court of law/under oath
The settlement and firing prove he is not a good journalist.
Exhibit A
hater the troll.
And?The settlement and firing prove he is not a good journalist
Cry some more
Turns out you're wrong about Tucker too.
World champion lying liar #1 - Putin
World champion lying (*)liar #2 - Trump (*trained by lying liar #1)
World champion lying liar #3 - Cucker Tarlson
World champion most gullible - world class swallower of lying lies by #1,2 & 3 above - Hater
you are wrong
Tucker is a terrible journalist
The legal settlement says so.
Why do you have to lie about what we are saying, hater?
see post above about lying liars -
hater (and thread) became the biggest lying liars on the internet when putin unleashed trump...
He said while following Russell Brand political tweets
How sad is your life?
It goes either further than that even.
FOX lawyers used the argument that Tuckle could not be taken seriously as a news source.
AND this known quan y about Tuckle was common knowledge. This was their DEFENSE of Heater's Top Journalist prize winner.
IN a court of law. Unbelievably stupid.
the tears
holeee sheet
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
