It doesn't prove anything. You avoiding my point blank question, again, just continues to confirm my guess as to who you'll vote for now though. Your red ass is just hilarious.
You are just proving again how ing stupid you are, Beta Cuck. How does posting a CNN article about poll results somehow equate to voting for Trump? You really think accusing people of voting for Trump somehow "proves" anything? You are ing pathetic, Beta Cuck.
It doesn't prove anything. You avoiding my point blank question, again, just continues to confirm my guess as to who you'll vote for now though. Your red ass is just hilarious.
Watch this:
CosmicCowboy, who will you vote for in this election?
If it is Biden/Trump the answer for about the 10th time is neither one, Beta Cuck. If you weren't so ing stupid you would have seen my answer before, Beta Cuck.
Great I put a link right there for you to click on, point out in that thread where you said "none" after any of the 5 times I asked you point blank.
And lol "none". In Texas that's letting Trump take it. This you know.
Why is it important to you that I acknowledge your stupid questions, beta cuck? It was a question I had already answered many times for others. If your pea brain doesn't remember those maybe chump, whinehole, etc. Can jog your memory. I have been very consistent in my position. They both suck.
Everyone in the US should be embarrassed by our 2024 choices for President.
Three characteristics required:
1. Help him win the EC
2. Will not in any way show Trump up or be the least bit more popular with Trumpers (eg. after an election win the VP would say he/she had nothing at all to do with the win)
3. Must show total devotion to Trump to the point of being nauseous to any rational human being who understands democracy.
The above can directly conflict with each other so this is a tough one.
I dont know the possible people the red team has suggested.
Old white patriarchal male complex.
But you cant say this as a member of the red team or, its racist.
You guys are too-easily forgetting that she's the head-and-shoulders frontrunner (and Trump endorsee) for the GOP nomination for Kyrsten Sinema's senate seat which is up this year. She's going to win the nomination easily this time and lose to Gallego by 0.2% and cope and seethe.
1 is most important first and foremost and pretty much throws out people like Kristi Noem and Vivek Ramaswamy. Any outsider without prior political office experience in general falls into this category. Noem has experience as South Dakota governor but South Dakota is tiny and won't do jack for Trump in the general in the swing states. At least Doug Burgum the governor of North Dakota is realistic and is essentially running to be Trump's energy czar and not VP. Ben Carson and Lee Zeldin are the best picks for the EC imo and you could make a case for Nancy Mace in the sun belt with suburban white women and military families in GA/NC/AZ/even VA, even though SC isn't a swing state.
It's been floated around by the millennial right wing podcast crew and community organizers like Charlie Kirk, but it's realistically about as likely to happen as an inch of snow in Phoenix city limits the rest of this winter. He's someone to keep an eye on long term definitely for sure, especially if Trump wins this year and a Democrat wins POTUS against an establishment conservative GOP nominee in 2028.
Last edited by Millennial_Messiah; 02-09-2024 at 04:59 PM.
He should pick the most unpopular politician in America, who also accused him of being a racist.
Oh, that was Joe!
Maybe Ben Carson who could vouch for Trump's medical advice.
That would be one of the strongest tickets, maybe ever so slightly lesser than Zeldin. The only issue with a Trump-Carson ticket is they're both in their 70s, so it'd be an older ticket, but neither are sick nor close to senile at this point. And, (a big "and"); Carson surely won't be the GOP frontrunner or probably even a primary candidate in 2028. (Neither would Zeldin, most likely.) And he's fiercely loyal to Trump and a minority without being a Herschel Walker or Dan Cameron affirmative action pick.
It would be a strong choice, and also Carson is from Detroit and will definitely help Trump eat into the Wayne County Michigan margin big time (he will, anyway) and give Trump an either greater leg up in that state which is zooming right at the federal (not state) level.
It's not important that you do. As I've told you many times, it's hilarious that you don't.
And 2016 and 2020
I dunno, but if he doesn't pick that NY in the House that's been knobslobbing him for months, it's going to be hilarious.
Elise Stefanik, no chance in . She's the GOP's Geraldine Ferraro 2.0 if she gets picked. Terrible choice, adds nothing to the ticket. Knobslobbing isn't an asset.
I see it going like something like this--
2024: Trump over Biden
2028: Whitmer over DeSantis
2032: Whitmer over Donalds
2036: Carlson over Newsom
2040: Carlson over Ocasio-Cortez
etc
stefanik
Or 2020, or 2016 tbqh
I want this dude from Florida
https://donalds.house.gov/
Lake would be a good press secretary
Do you realize just how stupid you sound? "Please pay attention to me!!!!!"
Donalds is a solid candidate, but Trump's VP pick is very unlikely to be anyone from Florida as Trump would either forced to relocate back to the Mordor known as NY, or he would be forced by law to surrender Florida's 30 electoral votes to Biden, which would be electoral suicide.
So, discard anyone from Florida from your VP list.
You never realize how red assed you sound. It's hilarious.
Or Rush Limbaugh could vouch for Yam s’ affirmative action support credentials.
It would be great if Rush and Trump could meet.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)