Page 71 of 83 FirstFirst ... 216167686970717273747581 ... LastLast
Results 1,751 to 1,775 of 2054
  1. #1751
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,214
    If we're talking basketball fit, he would've been a solid option a couple of years ago, he's on a decline and Bucks tried to get rid of him.



    I'm not sure CP3 would've approved of Portis.

    Giddey? Why would we add another questionable defender with no jumpshot?
    Giddey is actually shooting 37.6% on 4 attempts. I think the Spurs would steer clear of a predator after the Primo disaster. What he did with that 16YO was a crime in the state of California, and he’s lucky she only wanted a payout.

  2. #1752
    Veteran KobesAchilles's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Post Count
    3,802
    If we're talking basketball fit, he would've been a solid option a couple of years ago, he's on a decline and Bucks tried to get rid of him.



    I'm not sure CP3 would've approved of Portis.

    Giddey? Why would we add another questionable defender with no jumpshot?
    I want IQ for bench players and Giddy isn’t that bad a shooter anymore. He is making almost 38% of his threes and has already made 90 threes this year which would put him second for the Spurs behind Vassell. Also he moves the ball so fluidly and knows how to make plays with the ball for others as well as move without the ball in his hands. Unlike Sochan, Giddy can run an offense and he can actually dribble as well. So meh defender yes, but high IQ, playmaker, good shooter, and knows how to play the game. Perfect Spur

  3. #1753
    Don't Try. quentin_compson's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    2,714
    Giddy is suddenly supposed to be a "good shooter"?! I guess he must have turned a corner then ...
    This guy was basically unplayable by the second round of last year's playoffs, and unloading him was clearly addition by subtraction for the Thunder. He needs the ball in his hands but simply isn't a good enough offensive player right now to justify this. Could he get better? Sure, he is young enough, but the Spurs already have more than enough of those kinds of players on their roster, in my opinion.

  4. #1754
    Drive for Five! ambchang's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    17,982
    I will probably be destroyed for this but anyone think wiggins would be a viable option? He makes about $26m this year, $28 next year and $30 in 26-27. Is say that’s much better value than Vassell at $27m each for the next two years.

    Wiggins is a few years older but a much better offensive and defensive player. He is still quite athletic and a decent shooter. I’m not sure what would help land him but a Vassell plus protected first, a bunch of seconds may be able to make it work?

  5. #1755
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    603
    I wouldn't mind Wiggins at all. Good two way player with size.

    Wemby
    Barnes
    Wiggins
    Castle
    Fox

    That lineup has size, defense, can switch all day, attack the hoop and shoot fairly well.

  6. #1756
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    5,600
    The first question you have to ask yourself when thinking about any hypothetical trade is if the other team would see Devin as a positive asset.
    The only way we're getting rid of him as a positive asset is by trading him to one of the incompetent teams. Heat would have no interest in him.

  7. #1757
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Post Count
    603
    The first question you have to ask yourself when thinking about any hypothetical trade is if the other team would see Devin as a positive asset.
    The only way we're getting rid of him as a positive asset is by trading him to one of the incompetent teams. Heat would have no interest in him.
    Dev's value is probably neutral if we're being honest. I don't see any surplus value with his contract right now.

  8. #1758
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    5,600
    Dev's value is probably neutral if we're being honest. I don't see any surplus value with his contract right now.
    He's a shooting guard who doesn't do much else and he's been underperforming this season.
    Which team would say he's the player they need? Especially with current cap situation and everyone realizing role players shouldn't be overpaid.

  9. #1759
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,015
    I wouldn't mind Wiggins at all. Good two way player with size.

    Wemby
    Barnes
    Wiggins
    Castle
    Fox

    That lineup has size, defense, can switch all day, attack the hoop and shoot fairly well.
    Barnes is not the answer against jumbo bigs like Zubac, Jokic, Sengun, Embiid. Either through draft or trade, they need a big body next to Wemby against jumbo bigs, depending on the lineup. Naz Reid, Myles Turner as FA, or from this draft class Queen, Malauch, Sorber, Wolf.

  10. #1760
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    5,600
    Barnes is not the answer against jumbo bigs like Zubac, Jokic, Sengun, Embiid. Either through draft or trade, they need a big body next to Wemby against jumbo bigs, depending on the lineup. Naz Reid, Myles Turner as FA, or from this draft class Queen, Malauch, Sorber, Wolf.
    That would just enable those bigs to have an easy matchup on the other end instead of Wemby torching them.
    We need a big wing for PF position, not an actual big.

  11. #1761
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    9,622
    I will probably be destroyed for this but anyone think wiggins would be a viable option? He makes about $26m this year, $28 next year and $30 in 26-27. Is say that’s much better value than Vassell at $27m each for the next two years.

    Wiggins is a few years older but a much better offensive and defensive player. He is still quite athletic and a decent shooter. I’m not sure what would help land him but a Vassell plus protected first, a bunch of seconds may be able to make it work?
    I think you’re trolling, but if not it’s a hard pass.

    Miami is one of those teams desperate to clear space for the 2026 class of FAs which includes Giannis and Luka (though maybe the Laker heist changes that?). Other teams know that, so I suspect they’ll have to attach assets just to get off Wiggins.

  12. #1762
    Believe. onechance87's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    2,586
    That would just enable those bigs to have an easy matchup on the other end instead of Wemby torching them.
    We need a big wing for PF position, not an actual big.
    no we need an a real big after wemby.

  13. #1763
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    5,600
    no we need an a real big after wemby.
    We need a big after Wemby, not next to Wemby.

  14. #1764
    Remember Cherokee Parks The Truth #6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    6,759
    He's a shooting guard who doesn't do much else and he's been underperforming this season.
    Which team would say he's the player they need? Especially with current cap situation and everyone realizing role players shouldn't be overpaid.
    Does Phoenix know this?

  15. #1765
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    18,781
    I'd want to swap Vassell for Wiggins simply for fit purposes. Vassell is a SG masquerading as a SF, whereas Wiggins is a legit SF with 2+ inches on Devin. Much closer to the 3&D wing we need (though Wiggins can do a little more than just 3&D).

    If not for the idea of MIA trying to clear cap space, I don't think we'd have to give up anything additional in this swap. In fact, might even be able to net a few SRPs attached coming back to us. I'd be down for this, but I'm not sure MIA would.

  16. #1766
    Believe. onechance87's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Post Count
    2,586
    of course hawks get to face warriors without curry who just got injured.Everything going atl way lately

  17. #1767
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    9,622
    I'd want to swap Vassell for Wiggins simply for fit purposes. Vassell is a SG masquerading as a SF, whereas Wiggins is a legit SF with 2+ inches on Devin. Much closer to the 3&D wing we need (though Wiggins can do a little more than just 3&D).

    If not for the idea of MIA trying to clear cap space, I don't think we'd have to give up anything additional in this swap. In fact, might even be able to net a few SRPs attached coming back to us. I'd be down for this, but I'm not sure MIA would.
    Don’t disagree with swapping Dev, but I see the need differently. If you assume Fox and Steph are the backcourt of the future we desperately need more consistent shooting out of the other wing positions. It is why I’m not completely out on a KD for Dev plus parts swap.

  18. #1768
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    1,476
    If they don't improve over summer thats not gonna be good shooting backcourt. They're two slashers

  19. #1769
    Veteran spursistan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    14,642
    Really wondering how high can the Spurs jump up in the draft with a combo of, say, 8th (own) and 16th (ATL) picks? And who would be the trade partner? Realistically, at best, a couple of spots with Brooklyn and Toronto as the most likely team with which they arrange a draft night trade if they specifically like someone. Maybe if the Hawks pick drop to the 10-12 pick range, they get can get a spot higher, but it is really difficult to see any team trading a Top 5 pick this draft.

  20. #1770
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,015
    With AD back, Mavs are winning and should compete against Hawks in the Win column. Atlanta in 15th place. I can’t believe myself but, Go Mavs!

  21. #1771
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    9,720
    Bulls and Heat can still catch Hawks too and make them have to win two playin games. Unlikely but possible.

  22. #1772
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    9,048
    I think Heat don't have their first pick so definitely reason not to tank

  23. #1773
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    5,600
    I think Heat don't have their first pick so definitely reason not to tank
    It's lottery protected.

  24. #1774
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,214
    It's lottery protected.
    Next year, it’s unprotected, so maybe get out of the lottery and convey a 15+ pick in case of some disastrous injury luck next year.

    Oh, and OKC would be the recipient.

  25. #1775
    Believe. LeBowen's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Post Count
    5,600
    I wouldn't be so sure about Cavs coasting in a series against the Hawks, tbh.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •