Reply With Quote
there's no going back to the status quo ante
it's happening right now
there's no going back to the status quo ante
[[[We called that first]]] after ya's tried to run him off at the point of bombs, guns and saws + impeachments in '16. You just wouldn't STFU and let him be for 4 years. Nope. He'd done Hillary dirt, but you forget that Obama had done her dirt first. You couldn't allow an outsider into the closed circuit. He rubbed your noses in your makings and you couldn't take it...only dish it.
The problem was and remains you ed with the wrong guy, the wrong White man from town. Now, he's blood drunk.
Let's pray the party keeps on with the hair on fire Hitler routine
Although Gavin knows what's up and is running to the right in preparation for '28. I don't think he can win the primary but can't underestimate that sneaky bas .
Trump is a crook, he earned every bit.
Actions have consequences.
Why are you emphasizing the fact that Trump is white?
Isn't he everyone's president?
...yep, I've seen the piss-pot out there on the coast. He ain't no fool. This is his chance, the door is wide open for him.
Naturally, it's a troll tool. tee, hee.
Though I shouldn't pull that on you, Winester. You're a fine youngster. Sorry, old horse.
don't be coy, you're a wily old horse
No, I'm serious. I've grown to genuine like and appreciate you, Winester. You're a worthy opponent and a grand conversationalist about these common subjects here on this venue. You're plain spoken and easily understood and I can put your words into a picture so it's enjoyable to discuss these times with you.
I don't take somebody like you for granted.
well, thanks
in return I'll mention that you have a rare quality in this forum: you seldom leave a direct post unanswered. as correspondents go, you're a faithful one.
totally full of , but faithful
I will also point out that I'm talking to you among other reason because most of your faithful fellow travelers seem to have swallowed their tongues. Barely a peep from anybody lately.
Will not say a thing.
Are they bashful about something, do you suppose?
It is a weird time for (us)...we're almost waiting for the dam to burst, an accurate shot to ring out, it's almost too good to be true and we're fat on time...still almost 4 years left and the burner is already on like 90 degrees. I can't see past '26 with any sense confidence we'll still be there in that WH.
It's fun stuff and harmless in the grand scheme of things like life, death and old age.
Well that sounds honest.
I think Trump will persist until 2028 at least
I just can't "see" it.
"Drink up, dreamers/you're running dry"
She gets it
Ohhh. So which governments did we destabilize thanks to USAID?
You like destabilizing governments tho.
Yet when Russia does it>>>it's the end of the in' world.
Not quite as many as Russia has destabilize I'll betcha, Blake, huh?
Cuck found out
Sad what the Democrat party has become
Sad what the Democrat party has become
TELL THE DRIVER YOUR DESTINATION
Elon Musk puts on a suit when he hangs with Xi
https://www.propublica.org/article/e...slands-secrecyElon Musk’s aerospace giant SpaceX allows investors from China to buy stakes in the company as long as the funds are routed through the Cayman Islands or other offshore secrecy hubs, according to previously unreported court records.
The rare picture of SpaceX’s approach recently emerged in an under-the-radar corporate dispute in Delaware. Both SpaceX’s chief financial officer and Iqbaljit Kahlon, a major investor, were forced to testify in the case.
In December, Kahlon testified that SpaceX prefers to avoid investors from China because it is a defense contractor. There is a major exception though, he said: SpaceX finds it “acceptable” for Chinese investors to buy into the company through offshore vehicles.
“The primary mechanism is that those investors would come through intermediate en ies that they would create or others would create,” Kahlon said. “Typically they would set up BVI structures or Cayman structures or Hong Kong structures and various other ones,” he added, using the acronym for the British Virgin Islands. Offshore vehicles are often used to keep investors anonymous.
Experts called SpaceX’s approach unusual, saying they were troubled by the possibility that a defense contractor would take active steps to conceal foreign ownership interests.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (1 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
