View Poll Results: Who do you prefer more between Nadal and Federer

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll

  • Federer

    20 74.07%

  • Nadal

    7 25.93%
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. 08-15-2006 #1
    mavsfan1000
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,096
    So, okay. I'm just dying to know how many people have taken up sides on this thing. Do you like Federer better or Nadal? Why?

    For myself, I choose Rafa any day of the week. I love watching him play. Sure Federer has the artistry. But Nadal is by FAR the more interesting personality - plus he's just such an amazing athelete. I get the feeling that Nadal would have been a star no matter what sport he chose.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote mavsfan1000 is offline
  2. 08-15-2006 #2
    themvp
    themvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    2,254
    I prefer Roger. I donīt know why... Probably because he is better.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote themvp is offline
  3. 08-15-2006 #3
    TDMVPDPOY
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,339
    rojer ramjet
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote TDMVPDPOY is offline
  4. 08-15-2006 #4
    Duncan21
    Black Magic Duncan21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    1,321
    Federer is better but i like Nadel better, i don't know why
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Duncan21 is offline
  5. 08-17-2006 #5
    mavsfan1000
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Duncan21
    Federer is better but i like Nadel better, i don't know why
    Maybe because he actually has a personality. Federer is as dull as you get. I also like Nadal's game with the high looping shots. Very interesting to watch.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote mavsfan1000 is offline
  6. 08-17-2006 #6
    PAWW
    Gil-From zero to a hero PAWW's Avatar
    My Team
    Washington Wizards
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    205
    Rafa Roger For me it's the personality. I can't argue about Roger's game, it's superb but he is boring to watch. Rafa has the fist pumps and the spirit. It's kind of like Borg-McEnroe and Sampras-Agassi. I'm going to pick the most entertaining everytime.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote PAWW is offline
  7. 08-17-2006 #7
    1Parker1
    PhillyGirl 1Parker1's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    16,374
    Federer all the way!!
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote 1Parker1 is offline
  8. 08-17-2006 #8
    Bruno
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    18,663
    Federer : way more talented.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Bruno is offline
  9. 08-18-2006 #9
    mavsfan1000
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruno
    Federer : way more talented.
    Nadal 20 Federer 25. Nadal still has a lot of upside.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote mavsfan1000 is offline
  10. 08-18-2006 #10
    themvp
    themvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    2,254
    Quote Originally Posted by mavsfan1000
    Nadal still has a lot of upside.
    So has Federer.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote themvp is offline
  11. 08-18-2006 #11
    Bruno
    Bruce Almighty Bruno's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    18,663
    Quote Originally Posted by mavsfan1000
    Nadal 20 Federer 25. Nadal still has a lot of upside.
    Being talented isn't the same thing than being good, talent isn't only linked with results or efficiency.
    Federer can do way more things with a tennisball than Nadal.

    If you want a BB analogy : Marion is a better player than Ginobili but Ginobili is way more talented.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote Bruno is offline
  12. 08-20-2006 #12
    mavsfan1000
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,096
    Quote Originally Posted by Bruno
    Being talented isn't the same thing than being good, talent isn't only linked with results or efficiency.
    Federer can do way more things with a tennisball than Nadal.

    If you want a BB analogy : Marion is a better player than Ginobili but Ginobili is way more talented.
    Good point but Nadal is more athletic. I like his game better though Federer will probably be the best player of all time.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote mavsfan1000 is offline
  13. 08-20-2006 #13
    LaMarcus Bryant
    TRU 'cross mah stomach LaMarcus Bryant's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    5,724
    Federer will never be better than Pete Sampras; Sampras is still the most prolific grasscourts owner in history.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote LaMarcus Bryant is offline
  14. 08-24-2006 #14
    mavsfan1000
    redirkulous mavsfan1000's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,096
    Quote Originally Posted by LaMarcus Bryant
    Federer will never be better than Pete Sampras; Sampras is still the most prolific grasscourts owner in history.
    Federer has won 4 Wimbledons in a row and unless some other dominant player comes out Federer should own Sampras's record of 14 slams.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote mavsfan1000 is offline
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules