Reply With Quote
You didn't even read one page of it.
Not a one I saidd.
Ruined I saidd, after all these years chump might have to go back and read the report again (for his research)
You didn't even read one page of it.
Not a one I saidd.
Good riddance.
No one in the truth movement has the balls to say what he actually believes happened on 9/11, simply because even they don't believe their own bull anymore and they are embarrassed they ever bought into such idiocy.
Not even Cosmored is stupid enough to post an actual conspiracy theory that encompasses all the events of 9/11 because deep down he knows it will be destroyed almost immediately and he'll look like an even bigger fool than before.
Actually that is exactly what the NIST model tries to do. You can actually make predictions on each and every beam.
Chumps point is key in that while the NIST model may be flawed it is certainly better than anything else the ninnies have put out there.
You are obviously not familiar with this model:
All the 9/11 Commission report -roaches are coming out of the wood work because the credibility of the whole report on which their case is built has been proven bull ......
....it would be funny if it weren't so sad.....
You never read it either.
All the 9/11 Commission report -roaches are coming out of the wood work because the credibility of the whole report on which their case is built has been proven bull ......
....it would be funny if it weren't so sad.....
And you'll never post an alternative theory because you know it would be full of . You don't even believe yourself.
It is funny because it is so sad.
So you admit that NIST could have formed its conclusion around a hypothesis rather than forming its hypothesis around a conclusion...
What's your hypothesis, dan?
Pathetic. I'm the one who has been saying from the start that the report has serious flaws...been labeled a too-fer, and that's cool because I'm completely enjoying watching the 9/11 commission report crumble into its own lies...
What do you think really happened on 9/11?
Let's do another investigation..... ...what better thing to throw a billion dollars at?
So you have no hypothesis.
We know.
I know you can't make cell phone calls from planes going 500+ mph...
This is where dan tries to change the subject.
Because he's a coward.
Right. So in other words, you have nothing significant to add...
Add something significant, dan -- tell us what you think really happened on 9/11.
I think the nation suffered the worst terror attack ever perpetuated on its citizens in the history of the country.....I think the commission that was put together by the very people who were being investigated was severely compromised...I think the report which came out of this commission was so severly flawed it was laughable, yet sad...I think Tenet lied his ass off and one of the Co-chairman of the commission agrees with me...
I think the sooner we begin a new investigation the better..
what you got?
You didn't answer the question.
Coward.
blah, blah, blah...said the desperate man...
A couple of months late, but hey I've been busy..
One of the best 9/11 videos to come on in some time (originally aired on the History channel in 09 i believe). It doesn't attempt to be a conspiracy video or make any pretentious innuendo either way, just a compilation of very well put together amateur video...but it really puts back into perspective why finding out what really happened is sooooo important
....its a 2-hour video, so not for the Chumpy-minded...
Viewer discretion is advised
You're the coward dodging questions.
lol desperate
After a full decade, you don't even have an alternative theory.
You don't know your facts....if NIST is so certain of their conclusions why won't they release the research they did into WTC7 so that it can be peer reviewed? What is NIST hiding? Why did they break their own code of conduct during their investigation?
seriously....what if others in the engineering/scientific community put out findings on such an important issue as WTC7 and refused to publish the data they used for their research? That is where we are right now.....Why won't NIST release their data to scrutiny?
Have you written the NIST to ask them why, dan?
Yes or no.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Posting Permissions
