Reply With Quote
you're special aren't you?
Like what?
And how?
And why?
you're special aren't you?
You aren't going to answer any questions, are you?
Why can't I just ask questions?
You did for 20 years.
submit it for peer review. love to see it.
Peer review? The Professor has testified at every hearing since the 911 commission.
submit it for peer review. love to see it.
He peer reviewed the 911 commission report at gave it a F. If one of his grad students submitted the lousy work NIST put out, he would have failed them
Who has peer reviewed him?
Everyone
Great. Show the list that peer reviewed his WTC7 paper.
so, no his work hasn't been peer reviewed. I lack the expertise to judge either way.
No peer review, it gets tossed in the pile of meh.
There are legal drinking adults that weren't alive for 9/11. It's a fading event. I remember being in High School.
IMO, Bushie was used as toy piece for the attacks & subsequent retaliation. I won't go as far as to say prominent Americans planned it but they turned the other cheek and they underestimated the plan/damage.
9/11 remains my lifetime mind . Nothing else comes close. There are so many questions.
Hated the Saudis ever since.
Imagine the West coming together to Crusade those arrogant boys today. Our ancestors sold their belongs and boarded boats to foreign lands for less
Last edited by FrostKing; 08-16-2023 at 06:10 AM.
You've been wrong for twenty something years....just like I told you you were. you'll never admit it though cause you are still hard headed
https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/5/2/16
Anyone interested in real 911 research and Dr. Henley's work can read the reddit forum
https://www.reddit.com/r/engineering...11_megathread/
Why are RG and NIST lying?
for some it was conspiracies around Pearl Harbor, then JFK, then 911, then Jan 6th. These are all great conspiracies but 911 is provable there is just no political will to bring up the past
What do you say really happened on 9/11?
Post your narrative. You've had twenty years.
Or fold like you have every time you've been asked the last twenty years.
The shifting about of insurance riders/carriers in the days///hours before the attack is apparent. But you're never going to get the truth as we can't in the JFK assassination...and a score of other (events).What do you say really happened on 9/11?
Post your narrative. You've had twenty years.
Or fold like you have every time you've been asked the last twenty years.
(We) act like we're so much better than Russia is...it's a GD laugh...we ain't .
I have simple yet to see sufficient evidence for any controlled demolition. It is a dumb idea, that would require a massive conspiracy to carry off, the kind that humans suck at keeping secret.
The best you have come up with is "the exact mechanism of the collapse of this one building appears to be different than the NIST came up with" Even if I grant that, it doesn't prove your theory.
You have a poor standard of evidence, and are driven by confirmation bias.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
