Reply With Quote
Smallball is far superior to anything the Jazz can even hope to throw out there. Good luck hoping your team can even begin to hang with the 3 dominant west teams, just won't happen anytime soon.
Yep. What? You afraid one of the girls will break a nail?
Or is it the reality that no team would fight 1 on 1?
If it isnt 3 on 1, NBA players have no interest in fighting.
Smallball is far superior to anything the Jazz can even hope to throw out there. Good luck hoping your team can even begin to hang with the 3 dominant west teams, just won't happen anytime soon.
My bad, I glanced quickly and thought it said 89.0. Either way, I typed 89 and 83, and you said, "Hey, it's not 6, it's SEVEN!" Confirming your pea-brain.
Stockton didn't have experience? Malone was the only one?
We lose to MJ, you lost to Dirk!
It won't happen anytime soon, you mean like the way it just barely happened?
Smallball is superior to the Jazz?
Hmm....Who are the two best small-ball teams.....Suns...and Warriors...
The Jazz were 7-2 against those two teams this year. They eliminated one of them and advanced further than the other in the playoffs.
Superior?
I proved you wrong, just accept it instead of attempting to bash me again. And the Suns lost to Dirk minus Amare all year, let's not compare. Yes, they lost to Jordan, and that's better, but can't even start comparing when the Suns were never full strength.
Nash got called for a foul. Parker had the ball. Nash reached in. It's called initiating the contact. Not my fault you don't know the rules.
Again, Bowen got called for a foul, and it was a bad call at that. What more do you want? Oh yeah, your team politicked the league to have Bowen suspended. Can't win with the guys you've got on the floor. I forgot.
The world didn't see it. Amare had to tell the world about it by crying about how dirty the Spurs are. That whole "can't win without help" thing again.
So of all the you are ing about, you want a clear foul on Nash to be a call on Parker instead, and you want Amare to get an and-1 on the foul by Bowen. Does that one point and change of possession change the outcome of the series? No.
You're asking the league to step in and do something about incidental headbutts and minor ankle contact, along with suspensions for offensive fouls, while at the same time expecting them to make exceptions on a 10-year old rule about leaving the bench just because your team didn't commit the foul that led to the incident.
You're begging the NBA to change, you pussy.
The Spurs didn't play very well against Phoenix and still won easily. The Spurs gave away one game and Horry's foul sealed the other. The Suns were lucky not to get swept.
Proved me wrong on what? How? What have you proved?
You've only proved Suns fans are just re ed and will about this now and forever.
All of the big 3 for the Spurs had better than regular season numbers and their best series of the 3 so far, so yes, the Spurs played quite well. You are an idiot beyond belief.
The Spurs small lineup had their way with the Suns. Just so you know...
Even if a little point, I showed you the differential in free throw percentage, in which you tried to laugh at me like a fool.
Maybe that's because they were playing the Phoenix SunsAll of the big 3 for the Spurs had better than regular season numbers and their best series of the 3 so far, so yes, the Spurs played quite well. You are an idiot beyond belief.
You saw 89 and 83. I said the difference was six. You said it was seven.
I laughed.
Haha. I believe it.
Because smallball teams suck ass.
I thought you had me on ignore. Hm. I knew you were full of .
The Spurs had their best series against Utah. The only time the Spurs played fairly well against Phoenix was in game 6, which was a blowout. The reason the Spurs players had better numbers is just because Phoenix can't play defense. (Doesn't exactly make your case for you)
And I was right. I never said the difference between 89 and 83 was 7, I said the real difference was seven. You laughed and were proved wrong.
Geez, Finley and Bowen's numbers were also the best that series. They could not have played any better, and still lost 2, and nearly a 3rd.
SING IT, SUNS FAN!Again, you being a complete idiot. The Suns get 2 games, the Jazz 1, and the Suns should have gotten 3 had they not missed a couple key shots in game 5.
Weeeee
are the champions,
of what if,
but we've gotten screwed
in the end
we are the champions
WE ARE THE CHAMPIONS
we're never losers
cause we got the shaft in
every loss
Go and read quotes, and what analysts say, they all say their best play was round 2
I know. But I laughed because it looked like, before you saved face, you were trying to correct me for saying it was a six percent difference.
The fact you have to take THIS as your 'victory' shows you have no confidence in even your own arguments.
Kidd > Nash.
Jeffrey Jordan > Nash.
You think their numbers were up because your Suns can't play D?
If you were to watch all the games, you'd see the Spurs played absolutely possessed for the majority of the Jazz series.
Shut the up.
For Christ's sake, shut the up, man!
You are coming across as the whinniest in the entire forum (and that is saying something given the amount of Mavs, Nuggets and other Suns fans posting here).
"but then all the that the Spurs pull during that series"
What , asshole? The Spurs did not suspend Amare the moron and Boris the idiot. They were to stupid to follow a simple rule. And the one who started the incident, got a two games suspension.
Your ty team, in game 5, was up by 12 in the 4th and choked.
And what about game 6? Your precious Suns had acomplete roster. And they folded their tents.
I bet you most knowledgeable basketball fans would predict the Spurs beating the Suns even without the suspension.
Bottom line is you guys lost. Just like in '05, the Spurs were simply too good.
Gone fishin'!
Yeah no joke..... we are going to call you D'antoni's
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions