I hope Hill enjoys being a regular season champ and too bad the Spurs will give the Suns a good old ass crushing in the PO's next year.......Again, like they always do.
1) Steve NashTony Parker was the MVP of the finals. He's now very consistent with his jump shots. And Tony has 3 rings...what do the other top 5 pgs have? And Tony is considered to be in the top 5, by the way...
So I like Tony's chances...
2) Jason Kidd
3) Chancey Billups
4) Gilbert Arenas
5) Chris Paul
6) Baron Davis
Now...you live in Podunk, Texas, so you don't know any better.
But Im pretty sure any GM would take any of those point guards over Tony Parker right now. I might even put Deron Williams and Allen Iverson up there.
Parker cant be trusted with the ball in his hands in close games. The Spurs, themselves, never go to him in the clutch because hes a turnover machine.
btw - What do the other top 5 pgs have?
Answer: No Tim Duncan.
I hope Hill enjoys being a regular season champ and too bad the Spurs will give the Suns a good old ass crushing in the PO's next year.......Again, like they always do.
Oh plz. I just made Aggie Hoops fan my (isn't cute how he tried to steal my 'game over' line over and over again) and I monoadsfkljdsaf resorted to stupid name calling cuz he ran out of illogical arguments.
LMAO @ That list HAHAHHAHAHAH You are ing stupid. I would put Parker behind Billups or maybe infront of Billups. Arenas? Paul? Davis? You're a ing joke.All you're doing is making an ass out of yourself.
I actually think this will help the Suns. Hill is easily better than James Jones and a much better playmaker (think a MUCH older poor man's Joe Johnson). They exchanged Jones's salary for Hill's. It doesn't make them worse certainly since Jones didn't play d either. I was surprised by how little interest he had in the Spurs. I looks like there aren't going to be any I'll take vet min for the ring type guy this offseason. Although they usually don't work out all that well half the time anyway.
Yeah...if you think Tony Parker is better than Chris Paul, Baron Davis or Gilbert Arenas, then youre not even worth talking to.LMAO @ That list HAHAHHAHAHAH You are ing stupid. I would put Parker behind Billups or maybe infront of Billups. Arenas? Paul? Davis? You're a ing joke.
This is what happens when you live in a one-sport town in the middle of Texas.
You just got no ing clue. You live and breathe Spurs because you don't know any better.
Poor guy.
^ Davis could actually be number one if he stayed healthy/motivated. He can play good on both sides of the ball while Nash is a liability and Kidd is a little on the decline.
You're the one crying because he called you a head.
In the days following our sweep of the cavs, all the experts annointed Tony one of the top 5, 3 and even 2 in the league. You don't know this because you are bitter suns fan who stayed away from sports news during that rough time for you. So who do we trust, the experts or your dumb ignorant ass on Tony. Im taking the experts sucker.
No I said, he should read posts before calling people head and having me destroy him for everyone to see.
You basically play one note, don't you?
head, Im still right.
LMAO at how bad Da_Sun_ Fan_ is getting pwnd!!! I've never seen some one as clueless as he is.
I live in California, ASS-HAT.
Tony Parker is better than all those PG's on that list not named Nash, Kidd, and maybe Billups. I would love to post stats and analysis on those stats, but it's too hot and there is no point, because your opnion will never change, but you are in the super duper minority and are wrong. So, you and go take a .
No...I turned away cuz the Spurs are boring (see ratings).
I'LL DO IT FOR YOU!!!
Looks at the stats -bag:
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/player...?playerId=2779
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/player...e?statsId=3527
And Chris Paul is YOUNGER too.
Better than Baron Davis????
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/player...e?statsId=3326
Give me a ing break!
Gilbert Arenas?
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/player...e?statsId=3540
Too easy.
What else you got?
Weak, just like all of your "comebacks"
You missed a stat...3 rings !
So why don't you go back and make a comeback to what I said? I see you made a new post and yet you ignore mine because you don't have anymore weakass comebacks.
Wow...Ive never seen someone give THEMSELVES the thumbs up!
You must be one person logging in on multiple names and you got confused, huh?
LMAO!So why don't you go back and make a comeback to what I said? I see you made a new post and yet you ignore mine because you don't have anymore weakass comebacks.
What did you say? EVERYONE PAY ATTENTION....Elliot fan has something to say:
I guess you failed to read the other two words in that sentence: The analysis and in-depth coverage behind those stats, which would take too long to explain and would prove that Parker is the superior PG. You're those type of people who are easily swayed by big numbers, you probably would have Nash average 20 APG, rather than win a ring. You're the type that would be content if Nash and Amare had 10 alley-oops, but lost the game. You're a moron. I mean maybe you can't accept the fact that you are a dumb mother er. Now go suck on a frozen turd, it's probably 2000 degrees in the Valley of the .(Phoenix)
You turned away because you couldn't stand the fact that your rival team beat you and went all the way.
putting a laughing emoticon at the end of your posts doesn't make them funny.
just letting you know.
For the record, I think that it's:
1. Nash, 2. Kidd, 3. Billups, 4. Davis, 5. Parker with Parker and Davis being very close.
http://spurstalk.com/forums/showpost...&postcount=128 Now go back to the Grant Hill thread so you can post a weak comeback.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
