Reply With Quote
The league didn't say that
Like the LA Fakes Derek Fisher's .04 second shot that has been proven to be impossible the way the play played out. Nothing like lucking out with a slow clock operator. But, no need for you Fakes fans to worry because you'll be getting your gift from Missy Stern....your very own *ASSterisk* for all eternity. Enjoy!
**************
The league didn't say that
Like he did the NBA a favor by coming back
I recently made a very short film called, "The NBA."
It consists solely of one guy driving in for a dunk, 2 other guys standing completely still under the basket, never moving, and one guy with a whistle in his mouth in the background.
Once the ball is convincingly slammed through the hoop, the guy with the whistle gives his whistle a short sudden blow, and the guys under the basket raise their hands and look at the whistle blower guy in disgust.
The end.
Perhaps the Spurs could have been just a little more ruthless and protested the call. Not that it would have mattered, but we do seem to have toughness "gap" sometimes.
You think PJ would have just rolled over if the situation was reversed? Or Pat Riley? Red Auerbach?
I'm almost as pissed by the Spurs reaction to this travesty as I am to the blown call itself. F that "we didn't deserve to win" BS.
The Spurs got outplayed for most of the game but we still played well enough to put themselves in a position to win. But the refs (by virtue of the blown call) did not even allow us to get a decent shot off.
END OF STORY, IF THE LEAUGE WANTS TO POINT OUT ONE BAD FOUL IN THE GAME THEN POINT OUT EVERY BAD CALL IN THE GAME.
NOthing said about Tim Duncans amazing glide from the 3 point line to the rim
The refs were the only reason the Spurs were IN that game.
Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.
you're not the league, the governing body acknowledges one and only one missed call all the rest in its opinion were fine
END OF STORY, IF THE LEAUGE WANTS TO POINT OUT ONE BAD FOUL IN THE GAME THEN POINT OUT EVERY BAD CALL IN THE GAME.
NOthing said about Tim Duncans amazing glide from the 3 point line to the rim
Fact of the matter is Lakers got the "W" without the bad officiating Spurs wouldn't have even had a chance to tie. So hey it helped the Spurs in a way then came back to bite them in the ass
I'm tired of people saying the Lakers deserved to win bc they played so much better than the spurs. Well they only won by 2 so they didn't play that much better. As the score would indicate. So thats just a cop out argument.
Also tired of people saying you never want a ref to decide a game. Well a no-call decideds a game as much as a call, so that also is a stupid argument.
love how no one reads the second paragraph.
They said, Barry can shoot the FTs on the first game next season. Get over it already, if the Spurs lose then take it like a man but if they win... yeah, we will be ting on Lakerfans for choking a 3-1 series lead.
i love when people go
" The Spurs got all the calls" "so its ok that they didnt call the last one"
WTF? thats idiotic.
A foul is a foul in any part of 48 minutes
I also don't buy the 'Spurs didn't deserve it' BS. Yes, they played like and gave up too many offensive rebounds. They also looked gassed there in the end but what do you know? They were only down 2 with seconds to go. They were right in the ball game so they deserved it alright.
I understand that refs are hesitant to call fouls on those kinds of play unless it's definitive. But that was way more than definitive. Even if it wasn't a continuation, Brent would've had a chance to tie the game. Then of course the NBA turns around and admits the mistake but won't do anything about it.
Who said nobody read it, that bag made it all big and its what you laker fans have been riding now that you're "he travelled" bull has been denounced. That being said, it's mark stein writing it, not official comments from the league.
The article mentions the shot clock fiasco. Since that's pretty much the only source to hear of the league's acknowlegement, the majority of Americans (most of whom you hate, you sound like an Obama-supporting Francophile) will side with the Lakers. WE win the PR war. You small market sissies lose again!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
<---- No el tuyo
I think you can tell the difference between the Lakers and the Spurs here. The Lakers demanded the league review a flop by Sasha sdfklsjfd on Bowen and yet the Spurs are too decent to ask for an obvious blown call.
Fixed it for ya
You clearly don't know your Spurs organization that well.
If there is any team that demands the league review plays it's the Spurs. Stu Jackson has Pop on speed dial.
The article mentions the shot clock fiasco. Since that's pretty much the only source to hear of the league's acknowlegement, the majority of Americans (most of whom you hate, you sound like an Obama-supporting Francophile) will side with the Lakers. WE win the PR war. You small market sissies lose again!!!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
"With the benefit of instant replay, it appears a foul call should have been made," league spokesman Tim Frank said Wednesday.
Tim Frank acknowledges the call, Mark Stein gives his opinion. And as i've said before the only teams that out win a pr war against the Lakers wear orange or green.
Link? Or are you just talking outta yer ass.
and yet they did
Horry said you forgot to take this out of his back:
There's not much to say about it. It was amazing! That boy has skill!
Is anybody else tired of talking about it?
Can we start the next game already?
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)
Posting Permissions
