Dirk.
Two of the best players of this generation.
Which one is better?
Who will have the better legacy at the end of their career?
Last edited by picc84; 09-15-2009 at 08:32 PM.
Dirk will get the edge by many because he made it to the finals, but regarding making a difference to teams, Nash by far.
Dirk.
Nash probably had a better best but Dirk was better much longer.
You're right. Nash leaving the Mavs did have a big difference
Damn, you're right, I forgot about that le.
I went into "edit" but I didnt see the option.
Should be "who is better Dirk or D'antoni?"
Both never deserved to win MVP
It's no wonder the Mavs started beating the Spurs after Nash left. Or became a formidable defensive team.
please...
They did. Look at the Mavs' D rankings before and after. Nash is easily the worst defender at his position of all time.
son I think that Nash deserved one of his, but definitely not both ... Dirk didn't deserve his at all. His skin tone helped him get that award.
sons do not be mad that jiggaboo Chris Paul isn't sniffing an mvp any time soon.
son that is false. CP3 already has an MVP award from 2008 .... just like the Mavericks won the championship in 2006.
son and only shameless, blind homers like yourself would make a comment like that ...
god bless sons
David West is a tough guy. He tapped Dirk on the cheek and then shut his ass down for the rest of the series.
It takes a special kind of waffle to choose Nash over Dirk. The only reason you picked Nash is because you're trying to get a rise out of Mavs fans. You're utterly transparent.
son it was pretty funny watching Dirk being cuckolded like that lol ... I even think that West was banging one of Dirk's crackhead, felon girlfriends too.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)