Reply With Quote
no, the extreme right wing assholes at cons ution.org.
"we hate govt, we don't want ANY gun regulations by govt, THEREFORE, the 2nd Amendment proves NO GUN REGULATION as the original intent of the Cons ution writers."
Ah yes, those notable "rightwingnut gun fellators" at the Oxford English Dictionary.
no, the extreme right wing assholes at cons ution.org.
"we hate govt, we don't want ANY gun regulations by govt, THEREFORE, the 2nd Amendment proves NO GUN REGULATION as the original intent of the Cons ution writers."
No they just used the accepted definitions at the time, see CN's post. A well regulated militia in those days meant a well armed populace.
They were quoting directly from the dictionary at the time of the Cons ution's writing. Stay salty, Bou s.
Yeah, the accepted definition like the one for the militia Washington commanded.
See history.
If they just meant random dirtbags with guns they would have said random dirtbags with guns. They said well regulated militia.
for you rightwingnut gun fellators and the gun-profit-pushing assholes who dictate your bull , "well regulated militia" means "govt absolutely cannot regulate guns"
you mother ing gun fellators are clinically mentally ill, and live with blood on your hands, 90 guns deaths per day.
"Upon learning of the President’s intended visit to express something lacking in Americans, compassion, a gun-loving group decided to issue a warning to the President of the United States that not only was he not welcomed in their community, if he did show up, they were showing up armed and dangerous to protest his compassionate visit with the families grieving the loss of their loved ones.
Throughout the week, gun freaks warned the President not to comfort the aggrieved and not to dare set foot in Roseburg because they love guns and could not care less about the victims of another gun massacre.
The local gun maniacs followed through on their threat.
It was reported around the world that seriously sick gun-nuts hadgathered with hundreds of other armed protesters to rail against the President of the United States’ for having the temerity to meet with, and comfort, the grieving families.
The gun fanatics are very, very angry and claim the President rushed to “politicize” the tragedy by seeking a political remedy that may prevent the next group of parents from suffering the actions of yet another gun zealot’s murderous rampage.
Apparently, even talking about what is needed to stop the mass shooting epidemic ravaging America is sufficient to elicit hate from compassionless gun lovers."
http://www.politicususa.com/2015/10/...iticus+USA+%29
Mf'er fellator blah blah was there a coherent thought in all that mess
and the ignorant low-wage, low-education dumb s who watch only Fox swallow this as Bible truth. Blaming the victims is so much more fun when the victims are incinerated JEWS
Ted Cruz's Favorite Gun Lobbyist Says If Jews "Had That Determination To Fight" The Holocaust "Might Have Been An Entirely Different Story"
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2015/10...jews-ha/206110
Keep calling patriots terrorists
The NRA is finally put on notice: Gun shop held liable for illegal gun sale
“Where you have gun shops knowingly giving guns to criminals or aiding and abetting that, of course we should take action,” Sanders said, conceding to a change in opinion on gun shop owners’ liability in gun crimes.
Well, hours before Sanders made his comments on the Las Vegas debate stage, a Wisconsin jury did just that, finding a Milwaukee area gun shop negligent in the sale of a gun used to shoot two Milwaukee police officers back in 2009.
Badger Guns, then known as Badger Outdoors, was once the top seller of guns later used in crimes in the whole country — selling 537 guns that were recovered from crime scenes in 2005 alone, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/14/the_...egal_gun_sale/
the gun used to kill 2 cops sitting in a car in NYC? sold by GA backwoods dealers known to BATFE as source for guns used in crimes.
A new study finds 110 US children die in accidental shootings each year
A new study suggests something like this happens quite often in the US: 110 American children ages 0 to 14 die in accidental shootings each year. What's worse, the researchers found this estimate was 80 percent higher than federal data from the National Vital Statistics System previously suggested. So not only do these tragedies happen quite often, but oftentimes the federal data doesn't even pick up on the accidents.
RelatedAmerica's gun problem, explained
Using data from the National Violent Death Reporting System on unintentional firearm deaths for children ages 0 to 14, researchers David Hemenway and Sara Solnick looked at 16 states from 2005 to 2012 and extrapolated their findings to the entire US. (This, researchers note, is the study's biggest weakness: The system doesn't have data for all 50 states, but the 16 analyzed states varied in demographics and appeared to be fairly representative of the US as a whole.)
The study found the victims of gun accidents were boys 81 percent of the time. In about two-thirds of cases, the victim was shot by someone else. In those cases, 97 percent of the time the shooter was male. And more than 90 percent of the time, the shooter was family or a friend. About 19 percent of victims were shot in the homes of friends, and 11 percent of deaths involved hunting. It was very rare for an adult who's not a family member to be accidentally shot by or accidentally shoot a child.
Time and time again, the shootings followed a similar pattern: A child found a parent's stray gun, played with it, and accidentally fired it, killing himself or a bystander. It's an absolute tragedy, one that could be easily prevented if firearms were stored more safely.
http://www.vox.com/2015/10/15/953926...ntal-shootings
gun rights trumps kids' right to live
I would be happy to repeal it, given the chance.repeal?
repeal 2nd amendment? confiscate guns? take my precious guns?
all bull strawmen!
who are "those" repealers?
holy ing , you gun fellators are bull frauds
What I think is funny though, is that the author seems to think that the federal government can't regulate guns already. The 2nd amendment is no more absolute than the first, and there are plenty of restrictions on even that right.
That said, it is not a winner of an idea, and not worth attempting. Too many people worship guns in such a bizarre way. Guns have morphed from tools to totems, waved around at ill-defined enemies.
(edit)
At this point guns are some peoples binkies. They act like children needing them, and whine, pout, and throw tantrums when it is even suggested that maybe, just maybe, you might want to limit it.
People are getting shot by toddlers on a weekly basis this year
Shootings by toddlers have happened in 24 states so far this year.
Missouri has seen the most, with five separate incidents.
Florida has had four.
Texas, three.
Due to the low number of total cases and the isolated nature of these incidents I'd caution against drawing broad conclusions from the map above. But it is worth noting that the shootings don't necessarily follow broader population trends. California, the most populous state in the nation, hasn't had any. Nobody has been shot by a toddler in New England or the Upper Midwest.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/10/14/people-are-getting-shot-by-toddlers-on-a-weekly-basis-this-year/?utm_source=nextdraft&utm_medium=email&ncid=newslt ushpmg00000003
People are getting shot by toddlers on a weekly basis this year
Shootings by toddlers have happened in 24 states so far this year.
Missouri has seen the most, with five separate incidents.
Florida has had four.
Texas, three.
Due to the low number of total cases and the isolated nature of these incidents I'd caution against drawing broad conclusions from the map above. But it is worth noting that the shootings don't necessarily follow broader population trends. California, the most populous state in the nation, hasn't had any. Nobody has been shot by a toddler in New England or the Upper Midwest.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/10/14/people-are-getting-shot-by-toddlers-on-a-weekly-basis-this-year/?utm_source=nextdraft&utm_medium=email&ncid=newslt ushpmg00000003
What will you be doing personally to stop this?
Not owning a gun
Voting for people who want to take away your guns
What are you going to do?
I don't need to do anything. I'm content with owning lots of guns and not letting children shoot themselves in my home.
People are getting shot by toddlers on a weekly basis this year
Shootings by toddlers have happened in 24 states so far this year.
Missouri has seen the most, with five separate incidents.
Florida has had four.
Texas, three.
Due to the low number of total cases and the isolated nature of these incidents I'd caution against drawing broad conclusions from the map above. But it is worth noting that the shootings don't necessarily follow broader population trends. California, the most populous state in the nation, hasn't had any. Nobody has been shot by a toddler in New England or the Upper Midwest.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonkblog/wp/2015/10/14/people-are-getting-shot-by-toddlers-on-a-weekly-basis-this-year/?utm_source=nextdraft&utm_medium=email&ncid=newslt ushpmg00000003
repealing the 2nd amendment or banning guns would probably create too many problems
the real answer is social pressure
the fact is, people are coming to realize that being a gun-worshiping nut job who:
talks about his guns endlessly,
shows off his guns to all of his friends when they come over,
sleeps with a gun beside his bed in case he has to go g.i.joe on a burglar,
puts COME TAKE MY GUNS bumper stickers on the back of his truck,
mounts dead animals on his wall after paying good money to have them preserved so they can hang on the wall
is not something to be proud of. in fact, it makes you pathetic
someday carrying a gun will be like being a smoker. we'll probably never get rid of all of them, just like there will always be smokers, but at least they'll keep their ing mouths shut about it and have some sense of shame. this will drive down the demand of guns so it's hopefully not such a lucrative industry helped out by a bunch of senseless zombie sheep buying what they're told to buy because they're scared of what they're told to be scared of. sure, you'll still have your rural trailer trash and urban thug-wannabes who find a way to get their hands on guns, but eventually costs will be prohibitive and the s bags who profit from guns will move on to selling something else to stupid people.
so gun deaths, injuries are insignificant compared with other causes, so don't make new gun regs, don't enforce current gun regs, continue, even increase, the gun slaughter??
I've been all for enforcing current gun regs you know that I've said it numerous times. Just pointing out how far down the list these accidents are compared to more common ones.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47429844/73880162.0.jpg)
