Reply With Quote
that doesn't suffice as we are talking about what happened during the election.
Darrin. TSA. Chris. Cully. those traitors. They will be shamed
that doesn't suffice as we are talking about what happened during the election.
“The questions are obvious.
The answers are wanting.
We the American people deserve to know what in God’s name is happening.
Our legal system demands a presumption of innocence until the evidence proves otherwise.
And the evidence is piling up.
I have been around a long time.
I like to think I have seen a lot.
But the revelations of the emails that set up the meeting between Donald Trump. Jr. – and let us not forget both Paul Manafort and Jarod Kushner – with an agent of the Russian government is unlike anything I could even have imagined.
There is still a lot that we do not know.
But only a hypocrite, a cynic or a fool could argue that this development can be innocuously explained.
It is like a carnival mirror is being held up to American democracy, distorting everything we thought we knew into grotesque new shapes.
We need a reality check.
This is decision time, especially for our elected officials.
Which side of history will you be on?”
http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/07...ussia-scandal/
My guess is Trash will let DJTJr be the scapegoat
How many indictments that you've predicted have come to fruition?
shame
How fast you think US justice system work?How many indictments that you've predicted have come to fruition?
hater not answer.
Even more fascinating to watch you pretend only one campaign tried to get opposition research.
And claimed it was his attempt at being transparent.
Then, Jr got called on this BS so they changed the story indicating the NY Times would leave out important context of the email. The guy is an easy liar. And a very sloppy one. If people went to different stages of jail for the more lies they tell, the Trumps would be on death row.
Hillary dindu nuffin'
Trump Gave A Su ious Speech Days After His Son Sent Incriminating Russian Emails
President Trump denies that he knew about the offer, but
just four days after it was made – on June 7th – he gave a campaign speech in which he explicitly promised his supporters that he would provide them with new salacious Clinton intel in a “major speech,” in the coming days, possibly on June 13th, the following Monday.
Trump Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort then met with the Russian lawyer on Thursday, June 9th.
It seems that Trump thought his minions would get valuable Clinton information on Thursday,
and he could then announce it on Monday.
http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/07...ussian-emails/
Trump president, not Clinton.
its perfectly sufficient to talk more about the one who won president. you dont want to do that at all, which we all expect but still makes you a ing hypocrite and a useful idiot.
i dont care about clinton because shes a nobody. i already said lock them both up for all i care. i havent looked into the thing with ukraine because it doesnt matter. she lost.
if you believe theyre both guilty of something it makes no sense to care more about what the non-president did than what the president did. but again, we expect this from you because youre a puny little alt-reich follower who just apes whatever bill mitc or mike cernovich or that dilbert got has to say about the matter. sad
Maybe TSA miss first two times.
No that doesn't sound fascinating at all. I haven't really said anything about Clinton, for one thing, and I certainly haven't spent months denying claims that she did anything wrong, only to now change my position to something like "The other guy did it too" or "What's the big deal anyway?"
you rightwingnuts and Trash fellators forget how Pootin bailed out Trash's failing businesses
“Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets … We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia.”
That was Donald Trump, Jr. in 2008 discussing his family’s business ties to Russia.
I already said to charge them both if they did anything wrong. And it doesn't matter who won or lost the election if we are talking about campaign finance laws, which is what this is all about.
You should read up a bit on the DNC and the Ukrainian government before crying about Trump Jr and a Russian lady
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...ackfire-233446
Great.
Now you can explain how exactly the same.
why would i read up on that before talking about something that has to do with the MAN CURRENTLY OCCUPYING THE WHITE HOUSE???
get over it, not everyone is as hillary obsessed as you. if we lock her up, there is no impact to our lives. if we lock trump up, we get a criminal out of the white house.
how is this even a conversation?
Was it wrong for the DNC to work with the Ukrainian government and pay a British national for opposition research?
You are holding both campaigns to different standards.
"if we lock trump up"
Maybe TSA miss first three times.
yep, id always be more concerned with the current president regardless who won. why wouldnt you?
it was your hypothetical, re ."if we lock trump up"
Nope. Chalupa Fusion must hang!
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/0...ackfire-233446
... all very damning for Trash, his team, Manafort being Pootin stooges.
Of course, the Ukranians were grateful to Clinton/NATO for overthrowing Pootin's stooge.
How many top Clinton aids talk to Ukrainians? How many 1000s of cyber-warriors did Ukraine attacks Trash with? etc, etc.
Totally false equivalence.
Trash and his team were and are Pootin stooges,
Clinton and her team were not Ukrainian stooges.
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions