Don't think that's what he said at all.
I dont think you're grasping reality here.The season was nine episodes in when the show was canceled; and it came back to 27 million plus viewership. It was the #1 show on TV. What point did you think you were making here?
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood...r-one-show-abc
Today's re ed tranny
That's not the point. I'm not a fan as I said. It's about rejecting the left's wide-spread macarthyism.
You've petered out. You obviously know you ed up.
Where did I ever say that?
ESL getting in teh way of understand my posts here?
Post #15 and #20 speak cleanly and clearly about what I meant.
Meh, she should know in 2018 that making a racial joke is a career ender.
Dumbass.Chump lite not here, so I guess it's upon you to ask the-way-of-the-world questions?
It was revived for money, obviously; it was the top-rated show IIRC.
That doesn't mean there aren't factions with agendas; the controversy gave those factions leverage.
If I were her adviser, I'd give that advice, sure (but yea, she should've known better than to make fun of a white person, amirite?). But nobody should be advocating for destroying someone without due process. This is modern mccarthyism.
As an the Nielsing Ratings dont get posted till after up to 4-5 days after any particular episode had aired.
They have to have a sample size before they can measure how any given show does. That's how ratings work.
It's all done after the fact. You are so dumb.
derp strikes again.
What due process? She didn't commit any crimes.
Being a stupid racist isn't infringing on any laws.
So, you're just noting that you don't even know what was being argued.
My point was simple. ABC had a clearly established top-rated show.
Moron.
Due process isn't merely a legal term, moron.
What due process? She didn't commit any crimes.
Being a stupid racist isn't infringing on any laws.
You applied it as such.
You thought she was the victim when in fact she was the instigator. Not that it matters because you still thought someone ruined her career without due process.
Couldn't be more wrong.
This is about what Rosanne claims to believe. I don't think she's mentally sound. Having her show cancelled didn't help.
And they had already advertised season 2.
They wanted the show back until she ed up.
She's mentally or emotionally hindered is how I'd put it; I wouldn't necessarily make it a case of sound vs. unsound because I think she can critically think better than a lot of people frankly. I also think she's a selfish diva, and in a karma sense she deserved what she got; but I argue from the p.o.v. of noting that the playing field is not all even and that the media punishes persons who don't swallow the kool aid.
Well, thanks for that addendum. It only pretty well supplements any argument I was making.
She can think critically but she cannot behave based on it. That's what I consider mentally unsound.
More DMC diagnostics.
I ain't going to the mat on Roseanne having a sound mind, cos be crazy. But I do think she and sound-minded fans were blindsided by the network canceling a top-rated show over something so trivial.
You mean like you are? You made the thread.
I wasn't talking about you this time.More DMC diagnostics.
It's all based on financials.
John Nash was a good example of someone who can think critically but was mentally unsound.
How?
They wanted her back until she ed it all up.
I specifically explained this very point. Go reread or tell me if your #SpecialNeeds are acting up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote